Cultural Turn Case Study

2312 Words5 Pages

Cultural Turn
According to McLennan he believed that the cultural turn had taken place during the 1980’s and it involved an increase in cultural studies, it was largely inspired by postmodern and post-structuralist ideas, as well the anticipated inspiration of culture, knowledge, consumption lifestyle and identity in a contemporary capitalist society itself (McLennan, 2014, pg. 10). Since some of the key features of the cultural turn are linked to postmodern, it can be assumed that it came about as a response to modernism (McLennan, 2014).
The Cultural turn in current times can be looked at in two main forms, ‘epistemological’ and ‘historical’. By epistemological it refers to the notion that culture is universally fundamental of social relations and identities; and it is based on theoretical facts (Nash, 2001). Anthony Giddens was one of the most significant sociologists who captured the idea that ‘culture is constitutive of social relations and identities’; through this his central theme was about the relationship between structure and agency. The notion that culture is constitutive is mainly linked to post-structuralism (Nash, 2001, pg.78).
Whereas, the historical case refers to a contemporary society in which culture plays an unparalleled role in social relations and identities, it is therefore based on observations of changes in social life (Nash, 2001). The outcome of a loss in faith in modern narratives of progress through reason and science and the overall collapse of predominant norms and values is due to a strong emphasis which is placed on fragmentation and individualism (Nash, 2001). Hence, for the longest period structuralist-f...

... middle of paper ...

...ultural turn mentioned earlier are the acceptance of agency and subjectivity (Nash, 2001). Therefore it is of utmost importance that the planner does not allow his/her own decisions to impact on work that they are a part of.
The works of advocacy planners are to help ease the planning processes of the weak and powerless against those whom have power. However, marginalized groups often feel overwhelmed and scared of those who hold power (Davidoff, 1965). Therefore, those who have power remain with power and the poor are eliminated. For instance in the “Dixon Case” mentioned earlier, the taskforces together with planners did not address the issue of social planning and community organization, rather their focus was on overcrowding which disfavoured the Somalis. And hence the poor who were supposed to be helped were in fact the ones who suffered from the outcome.

Open Document