Cultural Appropriation

746 Words2 Pages

To talk about cultural appropriation, we must first define what culture is, what it means to appropriate, and what it means to culturally appropriate. Now, culture is often defined as being the beliefs, knowledge, and symbolic themes of a group of people through language religion, music, social habits, general customs, etc. It is most often used as a noun, an object, something we have as opposed to something we do. Keeping this in mind, I think an appropriate, succinct definition would be that culture is the collective intellectual property of a group of people.

To appropriate is to take possession of something for your own use, usually without the permission of the owner.

Cultural appropriation is the act of a dominant culture taking aspects …show more content…

Culture, on the other hand, is adapting and dynamic. (We can label culture as static if you view it at a specific time period, but it's nature is transient). It changes over time as the environment changes, as one group meets another, and as things challenge the status quo. These changes can be massive or nuanced, can involve entire aspects of a culture being added or disappearing, and, when meeting with a different culture, can possibly be partially or entirely assimilated with each other. (This doesn't lead to an erasure of either culture, but an expansion of …show more content…

The current cultures of today have specific boundaries that separate them from others, and the groups that these cultures have persisted in should have ownership.

My first counter is that human history shows the different groups of people and culture have been interacting with eachother for quite some time. Cultures are influencing eachother, having an active affect on eachother. Do these groups, who have shaped aspects of the original culture, becoming an active participant in the group, be considered as also having collective ownership over it?

Another counter is that these boundaries are arbitrary. For example, How many ways can you split up American culture? How many sub sets can you make, and how many within those, and so? Where do you start with the sets, what line of difference do you choose? Theoretically, you could get to the point where there is the individual, the culture unto themselves, for each individual carries with them their own unique set of symbols and meanings that they apply to the world based on their experiences, which is what culture

Open Document