Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of music in film
The importance of music in film
The importance of music in film
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of music in film
Rachel Sugg
English 3750
Professor Monaghan
21 October 2016
Alfonso Cuarón’s Contrast between Background and Foreground in Children of Men
Part of Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men includes what is popularly known as the “Art Scene” or the “Ark of the Arts”. After being recruited by Julien to help Kee find transport out of the country, Theo visits his cousin Nigel to obtain the transit papers. Nigel is a government minister who orchestrates a state funded collection of priceless works of art. When Theo arrives, it is clear that Nigel lives very differently than the rest of the world. Protected behind heavy security and shielded away from the disintegrating world below, Nigel invites Theo to join him for a luxurious dinner. Throughout this scene
…show more content…
So much attention is payed to the foreground or the lead story that the background usually goes by without much notice. This is a symbolic technique that Cuarón uses throughout the film utilizing the engaging nature of background to draw the audience to realize aspects they may have not noticed. This is used in the Art Scene on multiple levels. Firstly, as Theo arrives at Nigel’s, the non-diegetic soundtrack of Greg Lake’s “In The Court Of The Crimson King”. When Theo steps out of his car and is met by several guards, a Banksy piece can be seen tucked away in the background. Followed by a shot with Theo walking into Nigel’s suite, with two tall grey walls on either side of him that create a vanishing point element as the audience is presented with the striking visual of Michelangelo’s David at the end of the hall. Theo’s figure is backlit, therefore creating a silhouette, nearly blacking him out completely in the foreground, bringing more attention to the background. The statue is without the left ankle, leaving the audience to assume that the damage was caused before the salvage by some unknown result of the crippling society. This visual of the renaissance sculpture paired with progressive rock …show more content…
In the scene where Theo is escaping with Kee in a wheelchair through the ruined streets, the camera focuses on the main story, following Theo and Kee running for safety, but is preoccupied and caught by a woman in the background cradling her dead son on the ground. This image can also be referenced as a citation to a piece of art previously mentioned in the “Ark of the Arts” scene as Michelangelo’s La Pietà. The image of the mother holding her son is attributing to the statue with Mary holding the recently crucified Jesus Christ, drawing on the similar question regarding the cruelty of men. This image also invokes Picasso’s Guernica, also previously seen in the “Arts Scene”, which depicts a woman crying out as she holds her dead child in the lower left hand corner, which is sectioned off and highlighted in one of the shots from the scene. While the “Ark of the Arts” scene shows the extracted art placed in a symbolic ivory tower, Cuarón puts art back on the ground where it belongs and brings it alive through ancient and current contexts as well as a background for the main
The text also describes that West worked more deliberately on the faces than the things around the girls; people believed that it was a sort of portrait painting. Also in the text it says that, “ Smith (1883) has suggested that Fidelia may be a portrait of a Miss Hall, whom he identifies as the model for West’s Una” (American Paintings, 209). Fidelia is wearing a long white heavy drapery with a blue undergarment. She is holding a large brown book with gold clasp that is known to be the New Testament and she is also holding the gold chalice with a skinny green snake sneaking up but shows no fear to the snake and we know this because of her facial expression, she is just staring away. The text from the Timken Museum also informs us that the New Testament and chalice she was holding are ideas from Christian values, the chalice is supposed to be holding wine and water. However, for this painting the chalice is holding the snake to resemble poison that was meant to kill St. John. Apart from Fidelia, Speranza is wearing purplish long and heavy drapery with a greenish mantle wrapped around her legs and to the back of her, she is standing a bit behind her sister as well as holding onto Fidelias’ arm with a worried face while holding her hand up on her chest on her heart. Speranza is also holding a brown anchor on her left arm that is bent. Fidelia and Speranza are
When that room is entered all voices are hushed, and all merriment silenced. The place is as holy as a church. In the centre of the canvas is the Virgin Mother with a young, almost girlish face or surpassing loveliness. In her eyes affection and wonder are blended, and the features and the figure are the most spiritual and beautiful in the world's art.
I found the photography piece “From the Road to Tepeyac,” by Alinka Echeverria intriguing. This photography piece was a man kneeling down with a sculpture tied to his back. The woman in the statue had a green flag with multiple stars draped around her. This woman appeared to be the Virgin Mary. Underneath the Virgin Mary was an angel with green, white and red wings. The colors on the flag around the Virgin Mary and the angel’s wings represent Mexico. Also, the stars on the flag present the repetition constructed in this photography piece. There is no physical line for the foreground; however, this piece directs the eye from one point to another by implication. When I first saw this photography piece, I questioned why the statue of the Virgin Mary and an angel were on the man’s back. I realized the Virgin Mary and ...
At the top of the artwork the upper part of the cross extends beyond the altarpiece. The edge of John the Evangelist’s red robe on the left of the altarpiece and the edge of Mary Magdalene’s pale blue skirt on the right are cut off when the panel ends, giving the viewer the feeling that, rather than looking in on the scene, the viewer is actually taking part in the scene. This, added to the empathy invoked through the delicate, heart-wrenching rendering of the figures in the artwork, let the observer directly interact with the painting and places him/her within the narrative.
At first glance, the painting is very dark and shadowy convening the message of a sinful world. The chiaroscuro represents that we do not live in a perfect world, there is always evil lingering in the shadows. The main light source in the painting
... the visitor. Conspicuous consumption is exemplified through this painting and the museum because it was basically all created by overbuying and greed. It can be said that the single very reason anybody sees that painting hung on the wall of a misfit room in a disorganized museum is only because of one man’s extreme case of money flaunting in an age where everything needed to be big and flashy. Also this painting was created smack dab in the middle of the Gilded Age. The painting itself has no direct connection to this era but it makes an argument for why the piece is hung in the museum.
Male artists were the only people who were producing art at that time, with women being their preferred subject matter. Because of this, it was easy to identify that the portrayal of women in these works was actually how men perceived women to be in reality. The art produced reflects the dominant patriarchal values formed in Europe in this era. The binary opposition evident in the artwork was a reflection of the male
Dialogue and characterization are effectively employed by Ruta Sepetys to create a forced atmosphere where choices are limited. Told from the perspective of an adolescent girl, Lina, the excerpt portrays a character who combats between appearance and her own ‘reality’ through her artistic expression. Her drawings are “very realistic” because she draws them based on her view of the world (Sepetys). In the ‘real world’, however, they appear to be rather unflattering and therefore, although she “longs to draw” it as she sees, she is forced to conform (Sepetys). In Between Shades of Gray, Ruta Sepetys, through the utilization of dialogue, imagery and characterization, conveys the contrast between reality and appearance in the protagonists’ artistic interpretations in order to convey the contextual setting of the novel.
I found The Raising of Lazarus and Annunciation to be interesting pieces on their own as well as to be compared. At face value, these paintings do not appear to contain many contrasting features. However, by examining these paintings closely, one can conclude that paintings with similar themes, mediums, and time periods can still differ in countless ways. Light, medium, subject, color, space, and viewpoint are just a few of the characteristics that can be considered when analyzing Wtewael and Caliari’s works. It is imperative that observers of art take a deeper look into the different features of artwork in attempt to uncover the intentions of the artist.
The ability to create a picture of The Annunciation in one’s mind is a key factor in understanding the analysis of the work. Francisco de Zurbaran approaches the painting with a naturalistic style. The painting features a room in which a woman – like angel is seen at the left kneeling on the ground before the Virgin Mary. The figure of Mary is placed between a chair and a small wooden table draped with a green cloth. Mary disregards an open Bible on the table, as she appears solemn while staring at the floor. Floating above the two main figures in the upper left side of the painting are cherubs resting on a bed of clouds. They happily gaze down at Mary with eyes from Heaven.
Aristotle once claimed that, “The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance.” Artists, such as Louise-Elizabeth Vigée Le Brun and Mary Cassatt, captured not only the way things physically appeared on the outside, but also the emotions that were transpiring on the inside. A part no always visible to the viewer. While both artists, Le Brun and Cassatt, worked within the perimeters of their artistic cultures --the 18th century in which female artists were excluded and the 19th century, in which women were artistically limited-- they were able to capture the loving relationship between mother and child, but in works such as Marie Antoinette and Her Children and Mother Nursing her Child 1898,
Because Masaccio uses artistic license in his painting he escalates the Biblical story. This intensifies the outcome of Adam and Eve eating the fruit from the tree of life in the painting. Before Adam and Eve eat the fruit of knowledge, God advises them not to do so, or the consequence will be severe.The direct point after this is, when they are expelled form the Garden, is when Masaccio stops the story, takes a picture, and frames it. Through subtle colors and biblical references, Masaccio elevates the story of Adam and Eve, which kindles the viewer of The Expulsion of Eden with a feeling of tenderness and compassion. As Adam and Eve’s feet touch the floor, and as the shadows of their past leave them, their destiny, with a true understanding of judgment, await them.
Marcel Proust in the first volume of his ‘In Search of Lost Time’, ‘Swann’s Way’, (1913), and Donna Tartt in her 2013 novel ‘The Goldfinch’, reveal, through their central characters, the various impacts art can have on one's relationship with reality. Although Proust and Tartt’s retrospective novels explore similar coming of age themes, as their young protagonists’, Proust’s nameless Narrator, and Theo Decker, struggle between their inbuilt passion for art versus and the common values of their respective societies, both authors conclude on vastly different estimations on the consequences and costs of valuing art over
... the way that the artwork is resembled in the religious background of the gospel but reconstructed in to a celebrating impression. Throughout the fresco painting it depicts the myth of the Christ’s three fold temptations relating back to the article that “distinction between fresco and panel painting is sharp, and that painters are seen as competitors amongst themselves discriminating also, between the difference in genuine attempts in being better then the other.” Baxandall, “Conditions of Trade,” 26. in relation, the painting concerns the painter’s conscious response to picture trade, and the non-isolation in pictorial interests.
His father was a devout Catholic and denounced his son’s works. This painting is displayed as rising out of their troubled relationship together but it resists precise analysis. His revolt against his father is highlighted through, “But, dear Father, for what reason are you so opposed to dreams…? It would seem to me that dreams are a bastion against the regularity and familiarity of life and interrupt the perpetual earnestness of adults with a joyous children’s game.”