Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Vroom's Model of expectancy theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Vroom's Model of expectancy theory
Critique of Two Journal Articles on Motivation
Expectancy theory is one of the most widely used motivation theory. It is first proposed by Victor Vroom Yale School of Management in 1964. This theory is well supported by many evidence, and believe that the degree how people would act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome, and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual.(Robbins et al. 2008) Two research-based articles which used expectancy theory to examine the factors impact target object in different circumstances are compared in this critique article.
These two articles are both scholarly and on the base of research in universities from U.S. And they also have similar aims toward different objects. The aim of Chen Y et al (2006) article is to examine key factors that motivate members of business faculty to increase productivity of research by applying expectancy theory. To reach this aim, authors investigated 10 business schools in U.S, test several propositions. The primary aim of Geiger M et al (1998) article is to use expectancy theory to assess motivation of accounting student in non-U.S. cultures. This article also tests expectancy theory if it is effective in multinational setting. This is because two studies which have similar aim had been conducted before this article in the United States. Both articles clearly expressed their content though their articles’ titles. In addition, this article tested whether Hofstede’s five culture indices related to expectancy theory or not. Hence, Geiger et al (1998) article clearly have broader horizon of subject. And by skimming the titles, reader could easily catch the main purposes within these...
... middle of paper ...
...ticle is Hofesded’s culture dimensions were tested to be considerably correlated with expectancy theory components that were examined. It proved that motivation of students is culturally affected. This finding provided a way that motivating students from different cultures to perform better by using various motivators.
Reference
Chen Y, Gupta A, Hoshower L. (2006) Factors That Motivate Business Faculty to Conduct Research: An Expectancy Theory Analysis. Journal of Education for Business. 81, 4, pp. 179-189
Geiger M, Cooper E, Hussain I, O'Connell B, et al. (1998) Cross-cultural comparisons: Using expectancy theory to assess student motivation: An international replication. Accounting Education. 13, 1, pp 139-157
Geiger, M. A., and E. A. Cooper. 1996. Using expectancy theory to assess student
motivation. Issues in Accounting Education (Spring): 113-129
expectancy effect. Journal of personality and social psychology. (Vol. 13(4), pp. 306-316). Ontario: US: American Psychological Association.
Most recent theories on motivation conclude that people will start certain behaviors under the belief that this behavior will accomplish desired goals or outcomes. With Lewin (1936) and Tolman (1932) leading the charge, the goal-oriented behavior led researchers to want to understand more on the psychological value people attribute to goals, people’s expectations on reaching these goals, and the structures which keep people striving to achieve these goals. After some recent findings on goal-oriented behavior, researchers were able to differentiate different types of goals, whereas before researchers assumed that goals that were valued the same, with the same expectations of achievement, would need the same amount
Expectancy Theory suggests that human actions are guided by the expected results of those actions (Expectancy Theory). It proposes that humans act in a certain way only if they believe that that the action is going to result in a certain desired outcome. Therefore, this theory acknowledges that humans exercise choice on their actions. This choice is exercised in three different ways, which are classified as expectancy, Instrumentality, and valence (Expectancy Theory). Expectancy refers to the knowledge and belief that one can effectively do a particular action; instrumentality refers to the belief that one will be rewarded upon effectively executing a particular action, and valence refers to the level of value a person places on the rewards being offered after properly executing a particular action (Expectancy
When compared, both theories achievement – power- affiliation theory and expectancy theory resemble each other. Both theories can be utilized as strategies for gaining employee buy-in for the upcoming change. Achievement-power-affiliation theory, persons have a specific goal in mind to work towards, and takes responsibility for their own actions. I feel this theory will be effective in promoting employee acceptance of the upcoming changes due to the fact that some employees like to stand out from others in departments, and others may be motivated to stand out with new changes. Expectancy Theory persons, also have goals in mind, but their way to achieve their goals are that is based on past experiences and self confidence. I also feel the expectancy theory will be effective in promoting employee acceptance of the upcoming changes because most employees will know in advance that they will be rewarded by pay increase, advancements in the departments. Expectancy Theory people are committed, and motivated so because organizations rely heavily on employees to produce quality of goods and services produced in organizations.
Theories of Motivation What is the motivation for this? According to the text, motivation is defined as a set of factors that activate, direct, and maintain behavior, usually toward a certain goal. Motivation is the energy that makes us do things; this is a result of our individual needs being satisfied so that we have inspiration to complete the mission. These needs vary from person to person as everybody has their individual needs to motivate themselves.
Lei, Simon A. "Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Evaluating Benefits and Drawbacks from College Instructors' Perspectives." Journal of Instructional Psychology 37.2 (2010): 153-160. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 7 Mar. 2011.
Motivation play an important role in today’s work environment as motivated employees are more productive employees. However, the ways how we motivate the employees have to be improved from time to time as employees are being more demanding and that they are more concern about their needs than before. Motivational strategies have probably affected the most by employee concerns and values (Greiner 1986, p. 82). ‘A motivational strategy is any effort to induce employees to initiate and sustain activities that can directly or indirectly improve service productivity’ (Greiner 1986, p. 82). Motivation can have an effect on the output of your business and concerns both quantity and quality. For example, if you are in a manufacturing company, your business actually relies heavily on your production staff to make sure that quality product are being produce and being delivered to your client at the right time. However, if your production employees are lack of motivation they will be not motivated to produce the amount of product demanded, thus will be very costly. In the essay below, we will be discussing on the strength and weaknesses of McClelland’s acquired needs theory and the expectancy theory.
In today’s organization, there is a need for ways in which to effectively motivate employees. Expectancy theory addresses the underlying issues that are associated with the belief that a performance or outcome is attainable. Developed initially by Edward Tolman and Kurt Levin, introduction of the theory into the workplace was not achieved until quite some time later by Victor Vroom (Bradt, 1996). It is his first utilization of the theory that enabled others to develop and recognize the potential the theory played in motivating individuals. This essay will address not only the fundamental mechanics behind expectancy theory, but also how it can be correlated with education, performance appraisals, and leadership roles in the workplace.
Described by DuBrin, (2013, p. 306), looking at leader’s roles at enhancing motivation more broadly, Jean Houston, an Atlanta based human recourse consultant, says that managers can engage their workers by seeing them, as whole people and courageous conversations that builds trust and sees what is really going on. Expectancy theory is a good starting point to learning how leaders can apply systematic explanations of motivation, for two main reasons. First, the theory is comprehensive: it incorporates and integrates features of other motivation theories, which include goal theory and behavior modification. Second, it offers the leader many guidelines for initiating and sustaining constructive effort from group members. DuBrin (2013, p. 308),
Once the concept is defined, a model case can be described to demonstrate the concepts attributes, antecedents, and consequence. A literary search and a grouping of characteristics will be used to process a constant comparative analysis and to refine the data into a clear and concise definition appropriate for our use. The term effectance is used to describe the motivational aspect of competence. The theory of motivation is not solely based on the basic animal instinct of drive. People are motivated to behave in certain ways because they perceive themselves as being able to effect a desired change.
The Expectancy Theory of Motivation states that motivation is a result of a rational calculation; people do what they want. Expectancy is the probability that work effort will be followed by performance accomplishment, instrumentality is the probability that performance will lead to various work outcomes, and valence is the value to the individual of various work outcomes. When any of these categories are diminished, then overall motivation will decrease. In this case, Mary may not feel self-confident that she has the skills and education to complete the job given by her manager. Although she was given a ten percent increase in pay, her salary was still lower than the average co-worker. Therefore, she is still lacking a difference in pay between herself and Sue after the raise. Therefore, since she is low, motivation will be significantly also lower. The Expectancy Theory Predication explains Vroom process which employees undergo when making personal choices. The theory suggests that motivation is the result of a rational calculation people will so what they want to do. Individuals may have different sets of goals, they can be motivated if they believe that there is a positive link between efforts and performance, favorable performance will result in a desirable reward, the reward will satisfy an important need or/and the desire to
Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) as one of the influential motivation theories has a long history in Education and Psychology. This theory claims that “individuals’ performance on different activities will be influenced by what an individual expects and how much the individual values the things that are expected” (Wigfield et al., 2011, p.10). This means that expectancies and values are supposed to be
Organizations everywhere use different methods to push members of their organization to complete various tasks on a daily basis. Whether these approaches are successful or not successful, displays how effective the organization’s motivating factors really are. Motivation is an essential element that must be incorporated into every organization to ensure that goals are accomplished and so that members of the organization always stick to their mission. James Porter and Lyman Porter define motivation as “the degree and type of effort that an individual exhibits in a behavioral situation…and has to do with the direction and quality of that effort” (Perry, 2005). People often wonder what factors cause an individual to perform their job in a certain
Yet, despite the criticism, Herzberg’s theory still holds merit in many managerial situations. Experts have built their theories on the foundations of the motivator-hygiene theory to better explain worker motivation. Among the most prominent is the expectancy theory or Victor
Steers, Richard M., Richard T. Mowday, and Debra L. Shapiro. "Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Future of Work Motivation Theory." The Academy of Management Review 29.3 (2004): 379. Print.