Critical Race Theory: Race As A Factor In Inequity

4780 Words10 Pages

Race as a factor in inequity. Ladson-Billings and Tate (1995) posit that race continues to be a significant factor in determining inequity in the United States. Race matters in society. If we look at high school drop out, suspension, and incarceration rates of men of color in America we see a disproportionate amount of men of color marginalized and profiled by society. This is further compounded by the perception that male faculty of color cannot be educators or at least are not often conceptually visualized in that capacity (Bryan and Browder, 2013).
Woodson (2010) presents a cogent argument for considering race as the central construct of understanding inequality in America. Woodson’s most notable publication, “The Mis-Education of the Negro,” identifies the school’s role in structuring inequality …show more content…

It is a systematic attempt to uncover the meaning of lived experiences and to describe and interpret them with richness and depth. It is the search for what it means to be human. While simultaneously, Critical Race Theory (CRT) seeks to also determine the human experience but, explores deeper to determine if there are any differences in lived experience based on race. Phenomenology considers the sociocultural and historical traditions that have shaped our ways of being in the world. It takes into account what it means to live in the world as a man or woman (Van Manen, 1990). CRT compliments Phenomenology in that it also explores the worldview of men and women, but, also, goes into the distinct experiences of people of color whose professional and social lives based on skin color and/or race may differ. Phenomenology interfused with CRT is the proposed methodology because, it will allow me to look at what it means to be a man of color within the professoriate while considering sociocultural and historical traditions of predominately White

Open Document