Critical Analysis Of Bertrand Russell's The Philosophy Of Philosophy

986 Words2 Pages

Bertrand Russell is a very influential writer within the realm of philosophy. His specific work titled, The Problems of Philosophy discusses the many things that he believes is wrong with the way people think, act towards, treat, and study philosophy as a whole. The one specific essay focused on was titled The Value of Philosophy in chapter xv. This essay focused on why he believes that philosophy was worth studying and why he believes that those who don’t see his vision are wrong and at a disadvantage. More specifically he addresses the “practical man”, which he defines specifically as “one who recognizes only material needs, who realizes that men must have food for the body, but is oblivious of the necessity of providing food for the mind” …show more content…

Russell states that this is an important reason to understand as one studies philosophy and learns how to think on their own. This important reason lies much deeper than philosophy itself. Russell states that “the value of philosophy is, in fact, to be sought largely in its very uncertainty” (Russel 156). This seems contradictive at its surface as Russell explains that philosophy itself is very important to study but, with deeper analysis, it make much more sense. He emphasizes throughout the essay that philosophy develops one’s mind and changes the way they think. Rather than accepting popular opinion, he stresses that thinking deeply about everything in life can only benefit each person. The beauty of philosophy is that it contains no sure answer, which challenges one to think more intellectually and deeper about everything in …show more content…

Russell provides a few good arguments that would make people consider looking into philosophy, who would otherwise not think about it. He explains that thinking like the “practical man” could lead to one becoming dogmatic rather than thinking deeply and coming to one’s own conclusions. He also addresses the importance of studying philosophy as one would study natural sciences. Russell’s reasons for studying philosophy involve the importance of philosophy itself, as well as reasons for studying which will benefit one much deeper than just philosophy. His evidence is too compelling to argue in my eyes, which is why I agree with his reasons for studying

Show More
Related

  • Chapter Summary Of 'Problems From Philosophy' By James Rachels

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    In chapter ten of the book “Problems from Philosophy”, by James Rachels, the author, the author discusses the possibilities of human beings living in an actually reality, or if we are just living in an illusion. Rachels guides us through concepts that try to determine wiether we are living in a world were our perception of reality is being challenged, or questioned. Rachels guides us through the topic of “Our Knowledge of the World around Us”, through the Vats and Demons, idealism, Descartes Theological Response, and direct vs. indirect realism.

    Read More

  • Finding Hope in James Muyskens' The Sufficiency of Hope

    6773 Words  | 14 Pages

    8. Paul Arthur Schilpp, as noted in Steven J. Bartlett's ``Philosophy as Ideology'', Metaphilosophy, Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan. 1986, pp. 1ff. This article is a penetrating critique of the closed-mindedness of philosophers.

    Read More

  • Baron d'Holbach and William James on Free Will and Determinism

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Now that we have a clear picture of the issues being discussed we need to talk about the philosophers. The first philosopher is William James born in New York City during the year of 1842. He was an American philosopher and psychologist, who developed the philosophy of pragmatism. He attended priv...

    Read More

  • Is There a God?, by Bertrand Russell

    1134 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bertrand Arthur William Russell was a British Philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian and social critic. Russell was a prominent anti-war activist, he championed anti-imperialism and went to prison for his pacifism during World War I. Later, he campaigned against Adolf Hitler, then criticized Stalinist totalitarianism, and he also attacked the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War. Bertrand Russell was the recipient of countless awards for excellence during his long lifetime (1872-1970), including the Nobel Prize for literature, which he won in 1950. The range of his critical inquiry is without parallel in contemporary Western culture. Russell described himself as an agnostic, "speaking to a purely philosophical audience", but as an atheist "speaking popularly", on the basis that he could not disprove the Christian God similar to the way that he could not disprove the Olympic Gods either. For most of his adult life Russell maintained that religion is little more than superstition and, despite any positive effects that religion might have, it is largely harmful to people. . In the article the author explains to the reader and stresses upon the opinion as to why the existence of god is a false concept and thus concludes that there is no point in believing in a supreme ruler. The author expressively portrays his argument to the reader through the usage of strong progression of ideas supported with examples, a criticizing yet neutral tone with emotional appeal and rhetorical questions posed at the author with good development of language.

    Read More

  • What Is The Relationship Between Certainty And Certainty

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    William Lyon Phelps, an American educator, journalist, and professor, believed, “If you develop the absolute sense of certainty that powerful beliefs provide, then you can get yourself to accomplish virtually anything, including those things that other people are certain are impossible.” Phelps believed that certainty is the key to overcoming the impossible. He believed that absolute certainty and confidence in oneself will allow one to accomplish anything he or she put her mind to. It is common for underdogs in different competitions to side with Phelps because they are told that it is impossible for them to win. These competitors use the doubters claims as fuel to motivate themselves and become absolutely certain that they can and will overcome the impossible. On the other hand, Bertrand Russell stated, “I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt.” Russell, a British author, mathematician, and philosopher. believed that doubt will allow to people to adjust their opinions and envision what their decision may or may not lead to. He believed that nothing is ever truly certain; therefore, there would always be a period of doubt in the decision-making process. This view was extremely common in the minds of people in scientific or academic fields because they know that in the process of perfecting an idea includes multiple trials, errors, and periods of

    Read More

  • Is there a God?

    1628 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...arguments to be understood. He, again, displayed an illogical characteristic of theism by pointing out God’s special attention towards our planet. Also, Russell highlighted the fact that religious people believe blindly in their faith and ignore logical arguments that question their beliefs. Furthermore, he showed how theists ineffectively linked happiness with religion and then refuted their irrational ideology by providing logical reasoning. However, at some instances, Russell’s article showed signs of bias towards theism and ignorance of certain theistic beliefs which made some parts of his arguments somewhat ineffective. To conclude, Russell provided the reader with strong rational arguments that possibly made the reader doubtful about God’s existence or, at least, think about the degree of God’s credibility.

    Read More

  • Russell's Theory of Descriptions in On Denoting

    4035 Words  | 9 Pages

    I have tried not to simply re-write what Russell has said, but rather endeavoured to explain, in an original way, each part of Russell's theses, and in the order that they are found in the article.

    Read More

  • Criticism of the Verification Principle in A.J. Ayer's Book Language, Truth and Logic

    4592 Words  | 10 Pages

    The views which are put forward in this treatise derive from the doctrines of Bertrand Russell and Wittgenstein.

    Read More

  • Philosophy and Metaphysics

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    That is a good question and there are probably a lot of answers to this question but coming u...

    Read More

  • Review Of Rorty's Arguments 'By Calling Philosophy' Edifying

    395 Words  | 1 Pages

    What does Rorty mean by calling philosophy “edifying”? What are the main arguments that have been raised against this view? Do you think the arguments or Rorty are right? Why? Why not?

    Read More

  • Bertrand Russell on Analytical Philsophy

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...my views on perspective differ greatly from those of Russell, as you have seen. Russell believes that all things are open to be subjective to the experiences around them, much like the idea that we can never know the true reality of any object because as soon as you look or realize that the object exists, it changes because we have looked at it. I believe that certain things are as they will always be, and that the changes, if any, given by the subjectivity of certain items is so small as to not make any difference.

    Read More

  • What Is The American Teaching Style?

    712 Words  | 2 Pages

    There had been a huge change when I came to the United States. It was so important for me not only to change the circumstances, but also to convert me to the new way of thinking.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of The Russell And Strawson's Theory

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    Donnellen (1966) criticized the Russell and Strawson’s view. He claimed that there are attributive and referential uses of definite description. The former is about attributively using definite description in an assertion which stating something about “A is B”. The latter is about speaker using the description to let the audience to know what is “A is B” about. Donnellen claimed that Russell focus on former and Strawson focus on latter.

    Read More

  • The Value Of Philosophy By Bertrand Russell Summary

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bertrand Russell explains in his article that the value of philosophy is not in the definite answers, but in the questions and possibilities that it raises. He states that “The value of philosophy is, in fact, to be sought largely in its very uncertainty.” This can relate to the Milesians, the answers they came up with weren’t important, but the process used to get them. He says that the more we practice philosophy the more we begin to question everyday things in our life, and we come to find that the answers are only bigger questions. These questions lead to limitless possibilities, broadened horizons, and freedom from what we “know”. Russell hints that philosophy can help you see things in a different light, in a sense taking off the rose colored glasses and seeing the world for what it is.

    Read More

  • History Of Philosophy

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    immortality, death, and the difference between the psyche (soul) and the soma (body) are just a few of the

    Read More

More about Critical Analysis Of Bertrand Russell's The Philosophy Of Philosophy

Open Document