Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social inequality and crime
The relationship between crime and poverty
Gang violence in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social inequality and crime
In the documentary, Crips and Bloods: Made In America, it gives us a detailed history and insightful interviews from first generation club members. It is quite astonishing to think that gangs like the Crips and Bloods started because of young men of color wanted to be a part of organizations like, the Boys Scouts, Cub Scouts, and other clubs like them. In turn, these young men of color created their own clubs to have organization amongst themselves and to do something positive. Every single human gathering take after unmistakable standards, which are constantly upheld by authorizations of some kind, shifting from casual objection to physical discipline. (page 136). Although young people of color tried to do something positive, start their own clubs, and organized car meets, police deemed these clubs to be gangs. I feel as though the police and some politicians seen young people of color forming their own clubs as signs of deviance. Deviance is described as Modes of action that do not conform to the norms or values held …show more content…
by most members of a group or society. Growing up in South Central Los Angeles, I’ve witnessed firsthand, the destruction that sanctions have caused to the urban community throughout the decades and lived amongst what is known to be a deviant subculture. A lot of behaviors and crime being committed within the urban communities and the fact that violent street gangs flourish in sectors of Los Angeles seems like a rather unavoidable result of many long-simmering factors. The anger over police intimidation and invisible social barriers still sounds indignant and thoroughly justified after all these decades. Throughout my years as an adolescent living in South Central Los Angeles, I have been harassed by the police numerous times. One incident, my friend and I were hanging out on our front porch, when a police car pulled up, the officers exited the car, and said to us “pistol check”, then proceeded to illegally search us for no reason at. We weren’t gang members, but this is the type of treatment we received. At the time, I seen this as normal, and so did everybody else growing up in my neighborhood. Watching this video brought back a lot of memories, as I too can relate to one of the guys being interviewed and he recalled how the police would question his existence by asking where he is going or what are doing here? Community policing runs rampant in urban communities especially South Central Los Angeles. Indeed, there is an invisible barrier surrounding South Central. One day my fiancé and I decided to spend the day at the beach in Malibu. On our return trip home we decided to drive down Sunset Boulevard in Beverly Hills. I noticed things like, no billboards or advertisements or no liquor stores. The only thing I seen being advertised was banners hanging from the light poles for art expos at the Getty museum. The further east we drove, the grimmer it got. More cop cars, ambulance sirens blaring, and police helicopters. It is argued that the pathologies as often as possible credited to individual pack individuals tangles of misery, dread, and agnosticism are delivered in and by the more extensive culture, trying to cordon off the apparent danger, basically leaving the criminals to police and destroy themselves.
The film takes a gander at a dangerous blend of components, including the chronicled relocation of blacks to urban focuses, trailed by movements in the economy, both unexpected and steady, on top of the continuous and pulverizing impacts of destitution, absence of training, medications, bigotry and misogyny. As Bloods and Crips contends, these different powers roused a level of self-loathing in people of color that drove them to isolate their own neighborhoods and take up arms against each other, a contention sponsored by numerous present and previous pack individuals, who express distress, outrage, dissatisfaction and renunciation over the continuous
battle. There are numerous moments of sociological note throughout the film, but one sure to attract attention is the subtle attribution of responsibility for gangs placed upon female-headed households and the lack of youth supervision. This comes off a bit as victim blaming and seems to suggest that if only African American males were in such households that youth would not stray into the orbit of gangs. Surely mothers who shoulder the burden of raising children regardless of racial group or neighborhood residence transmit certain values to their children. But, the film veers away from such a conservative and moralizing argument by hinting at a variety of reasons why these mothers were so busy and were not as able to show love for their children, such as their long work hours in lowly paid jobs. Bloods and Crips also adopts part of the prison abolitionist perspective on gangs, by asserting that criminalization and hyper-incarceration has itself destabilized neighborhoods and disrupted potentially-functional families that could include male parents. References Bloodz &Crips - Made in America. (2017). YouTube. Retrieved 10 April 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdv08c0aiTE Giddens, A. (2014). Introduction to sociology. New York: Norton.
There is a deep seated hatred between rival gangs, which makes it difficult for the gang’s members to let go. Gangs became a source of income for some people, which made it difficult for many young African Americans to escape the gangs. Significance: This film shows how the police saw activist groups such as the Black Panthers and the U.S. Organization as a threat, which led to repression despite the Civil Rights Movement. This repression leads to anger and hatred and the need for a sense of belonging amongst the African American community.
In this film, Davis refers to Crips and Bloods gangs as the bastard children of the black panther part. However, during the year 1961 to 1963 black gangs was fighting against white gangs; Crips and Bloods created the gangs on a platform to self-defense themselves and their community from violence racist Los Angeles police department, and white gangs. On the same note, black panther protected black women from being abused by their husbands. For example, women didn’t call police for their husbands, rather they threated to report their husbands to the black panther if the men try to hit them. After 1961 to 1963 that black gangs fought against white gangs, they started fighting and killing each other. The recommendations offered to end delinquency and gang violence in this film is for black to see each other’s as brothers not
The documentary, “Crips and Bloods: Made in America” talks about many social concerns. In the documentary, both discrimination and economics are the main factors for the problems in Southern California. The gangs started because of discrimination. By denying people because of their skin color to join social activities such as the boy/girl scouts is what led to the formation of groups that later turned into gangs. Apart from that, hatred and threats escalated the situations that then turned the gangs into what they are today. According to the documentary, because of the gang rivalry there exists an invisible line that separates the territories of both the Crips and the Bloods. Not only is that the only factor, but also
The documentary Crips and Bloods: Made in America, can be analyzed through three works: “Modern Theories of Criminality” by C.B. de Quirόs, “Broken Windows” by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling and “Social Structure and Anomie” by Robert K. Merton.
This can be connected to the Crips and the Bloods by the similar treatment the African Americans receive compared to the roughnecks. This recognition as being a roughneck makes it much more difficult to get a job, and escape the society they are currently in.... ... middle of paper ... ... Anderson discusses the code of the streets and how this set of rules and norms dictates how people behave in South Las Angeles and gives rise to organized gang violence.
Differential Association Theory is defined as a theoretical perspective that examines how people learn to be deviant or a conformist based on the community they are a part of. For example, because students are sitting in class room they have learned to conform to gain rewards and now are able to achieve in society. Edwin Sutherland coined the term differential association to indicate this: from the different groups we associate with, we learn to deviate from or conform to society’s norm. (Handlin 2015, Smith 2017).
The essay of Debra Dickerson’s “Who Shot Johnny?” she explains how Americans only see the gangster, uneducated, homeless, careless black community and doesn’t
The way Staples structures this essay emphasizes his awareness of the problem he faces. The essay’s framework consists mostly of Staples informing the reader of a scenario in which he was discriminated against and then following it with a discussion or elaboration on the situation. This follow-up information is often an expression stating comprehension of his problem and than subtitle, logical criticisms toward it. For example, Staples describes women “fearing the worst of him” on the streets of Brooklyn. He then proceeds to declare that he understands that “women are particularly vulnerable to street violence, and young black males are drastically overrepresented among the perpetrators of that violence.” Staples supports this statement with information about how he had witnessed gang violence in Chester, Pennsylvania and saw countless black youths locked away, however, Staples pronounces that this is no excuse for holding every young black man accountable, because he was an example of a black man who “grew up one of the good boys” coming “to doubt the virtues of intimidation early on.” This narrative structure highlights that Staples is not a hypocrite because he is not show ignorance toward the problem he is addressing unlik...
The story, Gang Leader for a Day by Sudhir Venkatesh, is a ethnographic study of a Black King Gang in the Robert Taylor community. Venkatesh accidentally stumbles upon the gang lead by J.T. and decided to study them. Throughout his journey he learns from the violence and illegal activity he witnesses that “in the projects it’s more important that you take care of the problem first. Then you worry about how you took care of it”’ (Venkatesh. 2008:164). He witnesses beatings, selling of illegal drugs, and exploitation of residents; but he also gained a lot of knowledge about the community. He works with J.T. and Ms. Bailey, the community leader, closely through his study. J.T. has taken a sociology class and he allows Venkatesh to shadow the gang
The Bloods and the Crips are the two well-known gang families that started in the 1940’s in Los Angeles as a defense approach by the blacks against the whites (Dorais, Corriveau, 2009, p 8). Gangs are most often visible in specific areas such as restaurants, bars, metro stations, etc.: “The appearance of street gangs in Quebec and Canada dates from the 1980’s, when these groups started to become larger, more visible, and more disruptive to authorities and residents (Dorais, Corriveau, 2009, p 8-9). There are six definable features that can be used to identify the presents of a gang: “ a structured or degree of organization, an identifiab...
This paper will cover issues that young minorities encounter in the movies; Crips and Bloods: Made in America (2008), Gran Torino (2008), A Better Life (2011). Movies will be summarize, and compare and contrast youths experienced. Criminological theories shall be utilized to further elaborate issues. Finally steps and theories will be utilized towards solving issues, also possible methods to correct the issues will be addressed in the end.
The presence of gang violence has been a long lasting problem in Philadelphia. Since the American Revolution, gangs have been overpopulating the streets of Philadelphia (Johnson, Muhlhausen, 2005). Most gangs in history have been of lower class members of society, and they often are immigrants into the U.S (Teen Gangs, 1996). Gangs provided lower class teens to have an opportunity to bond with other lower class teens. However over time, the original motive of being in a gang has changed. In the past, gangs used to provide an escape for teens to express themselves, let out aggression, and to socialize with their peers. It was also an opportunity for teens to control their territory and fit in (Johnson, Muhlhausen, 2005). In the past, authorities would only focus on symptoms of gang violence and not the root. They would focus on arresting crime members instead of preventing gang violence. Gangs are beginning to expand from inner-city blo...
Many have attempted to explain gang involvement in today's society. However, there is an underlying activity of youth joining gangs that does not seem to have enough media coverage or thorough explanations. As the name suggests, youth gang membership is about the juvenile population creating and joining gangs. Research indicates that youth gang membership exists in contemporary north America (Bernburg et al. 2006; aLilly et al. 2011; Maclure and Sotelo 2004; Sims 1997; Wiley et al. 2013; Yoder et al. 2003). This paper will examine the factors associated with youth gang membership using Karl Marx's conflict theory and labeling theory in comparison. Although conflict theory helps explain why a troublesome economy and coming from a low-socioeconomic status contributes to gang involvement, the theory has its limitations. On the other hand, labeling theory is unable to fully explain youth gang involvement based on the aforementioned factors. That being said, it can give a better explanation based on the factor of government intervention in the lives of citizens such as the context of stop-and-frisk which lead to unwarranted searches.
The differences between a club and a gang, are quite distinct, but it is the connotational differences between these two words which distinguishes one from the other. The New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language defines a club as; "...an association of people with some common interest who meet periodically..." It defines a gang as "...a number of men or boys banding together, esp. lawlessly..." This definition is traditionally slanted toward applying to male youth, and stereotypical gangsters, from the Mafia to street criminals. Persons who often have a negative attitude toward youth see gangs. Often individuals form gangs out of fear and for the protection of their members whether they are the Bloods and Crips of Los Angeles or the Sharks and the Jets of "West Side Story." Gangs may not possess a set of formal written rules, but all of them have their own sets of customs or conditions. Gangs may or may not be facilitated in a branch of higher and lower members, mimicking a military model. Gangs often have a loosely defined set of goals, and are often involved in delinquent activities.
Gang violence is a major problem in our society today. If nothing is done soon, gang violence could take place in our neighborhoods. MW Klein, a gang researcher, says that gangs are an aggregation of youths who perceive themselves as distinct, and that are viewed as distinct by the community. Klein also states that the gangs call forth a consistently negative image of themselves through their actions (Klein). To those involved in gangs however, gang membership provided a youth means of attempting to consolidate their gender identities (Douglas). Most of the early American street gangs have historically been ethnically based. Early gangs were mainly Irish, Polish, or Italian (Klein).