Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social effect on nature versus nurture in crime
Factor affecting criminal behavior
Four criminology theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social effect on nature versus nurture in crime
"Our primary aim is to discover how some social structures exert a definite pressure upon certain persons in the society to engage in nonconforming rather that conforming conduct. If we can locate groups peculiarly subject to such pressures, we should expect to find fairly high levels of deviant behaviour in these groups, not because the human beings comprising them are compounded of distinctive biological tendencies, but because they are responding to the social situation in which they find themselves"(Merton, 1957 p. 186).
American sociologist, Robert Merton has become one of the worlds most cited theorist in the study of deviance.
Born in 1910, in the slums of South Philadelphia, Merton received a scholarship attend Temple University, following his education at Temple, Merton won a graduate assistantship to Harvard, where he later went on to teach at the renowned University, (Lilly, 2002). In 1938, while teaching at Harvard, Merton published his book, "Social Structure and Anomie", at the age of twenty eight, (Lilly, 2002).
Working within the overall functionalist perspective- which puts a great deal of emphasis on the role of culture, Merton centred his research on the notion that deviance was a consequence of the cultural ideals imposed upon society, (www.home.comcast.net). He believed that deviance was, not by nature, inherent, but socially introduced, (Empey, 1978). Like the Chicago School of Thought, Merton located the roots of his research in the very fabric of American society, (Lilly, 2002).
By examining the foundations and ideas expressed in Merton's theory, we can discover whether is work holds any relevance to our understanding of crime today.
Robert Merton took Emile Durkhiem's theory of `Anomie', ...
... middle of paper ...
...gy and a restricted class structure, he stopped short of asking how this condition originated and persists unabated, (Lilly, 2002). Despite this, his work had enormous Post War influence, and was indirectly attributed to many of the social reforms implemented in post war societies. In New Zealand we now find greater assistance to those disadvantage and programmes that attempt to reduce other problems of society such as racial discrimination.
Merton's deemed Economic adversity should see crime rise, yet it increased when there was no unemployment in New Zealand the 50s and 60s. Ironically, Merton's work seems more appropriate at examining social disadvantage at present, than when he was writing in America in the 1930s.
.
As a result, Robert K. Merton's theory and book, "Social Structure and Anomie" has become an integral part of criminological theory today."
There are five different forms of this theory, with two being represented by Llewelyn Moss, conformity and innovation. Inferring from the setting of this movie, the socially acceptable goals of the time were more than likely for a man to settle down and provide for his family. Moss attempts this conformity for as long as he can, until a better opportunity, the money, comes along. He decides that his current life isn’t enough for him, and attempts to innovate to raise his status in life. Unfortunately for Moss, he gets randomly killed by a separate party for the money, coinciding with the basis of Merton’s theory, that crime serves as a way to enforce these
Merton to describe the relations of deviance and criminals. The deviances are the ones that just don’t believe in the customs at all and do as they please or what they must to survive. The criminals are the ones that accept the customs of the society, but still decide to break the rules. The Holocaust caused all groups different ways of achieving their goals due to the amount of resources they were equipped with. The cultural goals are always based on the atmosphere of the particularly situation at hand and what equip you have at
Adler, Patricia A., and Adler Peter. Constructions of Deviance: Social Power, Context, and Interaction. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomas/Wadsworth, 2009.
Winslow, R. W., & Zhang, S. (2008). Contemporary Theories of Crime. Criminology: a global perspective (). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory merged ideas from Merton’s Strain theory and the Robert Merton’s strain theory and the Chicago school on how criminal behavior is learned through cultural transmission (Lilly et al.2010). The Chicago school was based off Edwin Sutherland’s Differential Association theory and the research from the Chicago school played a immense role for these two theorists to understand criminal behavior and develop their own theory. Robert Merton’s Strain theory solely focuses on the American Dream and the failure to achieve economic success, in particular his research looked at the social structure barriers for the lower class (Bernburg 2002).
Meyer Schkolnick was an American Sociologist born July 4, 1910 in the slums of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He eventually changed his name to Robert Merton for the sake of having a more “Americanized” name (Nakamura, 2015). Merton is most regarded for his anomic strain theory, which is an adaptation of Durkheim’s anomie. According to Merton, “It is only when a system of cultural values extols, virtually above all else, certain common symbols of success for the population at large while its social structure rigorously restricts or completely eliminates access to approved modes of acquiring these symbols.that antisocial behavior ensues on a considerable scale” (Merton, 1938). In other words, Merton believed that crime was a result of society having these symbols of success or belief in the American Dream.
Drawing from tenets of Marxist theory, critical criminology believe that crime results from the mode of production by capitalist and the economic structures they have created. Social classes have been divided into two: those whose income is secured by property ownership; and those whose income is secured by their labor. The resultant class structure influences the opportunities of an individual to succeed in life and his propensity to engage in crime. Although it encompasses the macro-economic factors that are rarely included in micro-economic analysis of crime, it does not substitute those macro factors, like unemployment, to micro factors, like being jobless. However, it combines the macro and micro factors in analyzing how micro factors of crime are integrated into the macro structures.
Meyer Schkolnick was an American Sociologist born July 4th, 1910 in the slums of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He eventually changed his name to Robert Merton for the sake of having a more “Americanized” name. Merton is most regarded for his anomic strain theory, which is an adaptation of Durkheim’s anomie. According to Merton “ It is only when a system of cultural values extols, virtually above all else, certain common symbols of success for the population at large while its social structure rigorously restricts or completely eliminates access to approved modes of acquiring these symbols…that antisocial behavior ensues on a considerable scale ” (Merton, 1938). In other words, Merton believed that crime was a result of society having these symbols of success or belief in the American Dream. Merton came up with a concept called the 5 modes of adaptation, which described the topology of individuals as Conformist, Innovator, Ritualism, Retreatism, and Rebellion how they adapt to society goals and their ways of reaching goals. Merton was particularly concerned with Innovators, or those who believe in the American Dream but have limited access to institutionalized means of reaching those goals, and as a result
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
Robert Merton used the term of anomie, develop by the French sociologist Emile Durkheim in 1951 to explain organized crime. Anomie is refer to a state of normlessness which could be the result of dramatic change such as an economic depression. According to Robert’s theory organized crime is a normal response to the pressure that society put on an individual. As the French visitor Alexis de Tocqueville debates, Americans pursue prosperity but many debate whether or not they took the shortest route to the goal. And according to Merton, for Americans, the goal is emphasized not the mean that is why the doctrine that says the the-end-justifies-the-means is used by many people when they are about to do an illicit act because for many the goal is
This theory places the individual into a box where the individual internalises everything. The individual in their box has culturally defined goals, their personal means to obtain these goals, the strain placed upon them from the disjunction between the society’s goals and their means. The strain on the individual leads to their selection of one of five adaptions without taking into consideration the individuals reaction to the strain of other individuals and groups and their interaction with the individual (Cohen, 1965). This is prominent in individuals who are members of social groups, such as members of church or religious groups, as the individual’s reaction to their personal strain is heavily influenced by their social interaction with the group. Individuals who are members of religious groups are unlikely to lean towards deviance and crime due to the conflict with their belief system and their connection with the groups, although it is not uncommon but these crimes due to be crimes not associated with strain, while individuals without that strong relationship with a social group are more likely to associate with deviance and crime. Furthermore, the anomie theory fails to look at the relationship between individuals and groups when it comes to deviant and criminal behaviour. Individuals are more likely to engage in joyriding, vandalism or violent behaviour when placed in a group. With the influence of peer pressure on individuals and normalisation being an important central factor in an individual’s likelihood to be deviant, the anomie theory is not taking into account a critical piece of the puzzle. The neglecting of other individuals and groups experiences when looking at the anomie theory means the that it’s not considering these experiences, whether conforming or deviant, and how they could
Robert Merton’s theory of anomie explains organized crime in the sense that when there is a lack of moral obligation in society, individuals tend to turn to whatever means necessary to reach their goals. Organized crime provides the perfect outlet for individuals to work together for the purpose of collective success between the primary members involved. These situations are especially prevalent when certain groups feel that the current society has created a case where they are unlikely to succeed through traditional, ethical means. For example, as the text states, immigrants coming to the united states in the nineteenth century realized that success would be difficult for them to achieve; therefore, organized crime became increasingly prevalent
There are many theories used to look at the causes of crime, but both Durkheim and Merton believe or blame society for the levels of crime.
The majority of society conforms to the methods accepted by society; however there are some that choose to follow unconventional means to reach their goals. Structures, such as the education system, are created by society to contribute and keep the society functioning properly; however society does not provide the means to everyone to accomplish the goals it sets out for them. Merton referred to this as anomie. Socially accepted goals place pressure on individuals to conform, forcing them to either work within the structures society, or engage in a deviant subculture in an order to achieve those goals. This imbalance is the basis of Merton’s strain
Deutschmann, Linda B. (2002). Deviance and Social Control Third Edition. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Thomson Learning.