Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Durkheim and his impact on sociology
Durkheim and his impact on sociology
Durkheim and his impact on sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Durkheim and his impact on sociology
Introduction The word anomie has been used widely over the past few centuries, to describe social conditions. It has been defined and applied in many different ways throughout history; it has also been used in historical discussions of the consequences of the quick social change and how the cultures interact and also the social structure (Baumer, 2014). The anomie theory was mostly promoted by the research done by Emile Durkheim and Robert Merton. It is also used as a central explanation of modern substantial observing rates of serious crimes (Baumer, 2014). Merton’s anomie theory and Messner and Rosenfeld’s institutional-anomie theory (IAT) are criminological theories and they have played a huge role in research over the past decades, helping to identify social and cultural conditions that encourage the levels of crime (Baumer, 2014). This essay will be comparing and contrasting the concept of anomie looking at it from two different views Durkheim and Merton. And it also look at which view is more relevant in South Africa in understanding crime. There are many theories used to look at the causes of crime, but both Durkheim and Merton believe or blame society for the levels of crime. Durkheim’s Concept of Anomie ‘European society was attempting to come to terms with modernity. Industrialization and urbanization had profoundly altered the nature of European societies. Rapid and sometimes abrupt social upheavals had occurred, especially in his own country, France. (Tierney, 1996: 82)’ (Portsmouth, 2007). Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist that first familiarized the concept of anomie in his book, which was published in 1893 (Criminology.fsu.edu, 2014). He used this concept to help understand the condition of deregulation t... ... middle of paper ... ...is increasing or decreasing. Durkheim’s concept of anomie states that due the transition from the mechanical cohesion to the organic cohesion, has caused the society rule to break down and causing a state normlessness. While Merton does not think that normlessness can cause individual to participate deviant behavior, he states that due to the cultural society goals, that emphasis on that fact you have to successful but then provides little or no mean of the community to achieve them. I believe that in order for us in South Africa to understand crime we need to use Merton’s concept of anomie because, is easy to understand and it’s also evident in the country already, I say this because in low class community in South Africa have more crime or the people there participate in deviant behavior. In all the two views are very important in understanding crime in general.
Anomie is characterized as a feeling of normlessness. This results from a breakdown of social norms and without these norms to guide an individual they are unable to find a place in society or adjust to the constant changes in life. The consequence becomes the individual feeling a sense of dissatisfaction, frustration, conflict and ultimately deviance. Robert Merton addresses the five ways in which individual adapts to strain by limiting the socially approved goals and means. These five modes of adaptation include conforming, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion. In Falling Down different characters can be linked to one or more of these five adaptations.
The social deviance anomie theory also known as strain theory is defined as means to an end. This means that if the goals that society holds for people are unreachable individuals may turn to illegitimate ways of getting there. Throughout this paper I will provide details as to why we should use anomie theory when defining deviance among brothel workers presented in Brothel Mustang Ranch and its Women written by Alexa Albert.
There are many views on crime and deviance and many theories to why they occur.
Both theories by Merton and Agnew are similar because their focus is that social situations and conflicts an individual’s comes in contact within his/her life, may produce crime by emphasizing the a goal of success, much more than the means to achieve it. With Merton’s theory he adopted Durkheim’s concept of anomie to explain deviance. Merton’s theory combined both structural and cultural factors. Merton insists that society promotes goals for their citizens and norms for other’s behavior in attempting to reach these goals. In Merton’s theory people do crime when they are unable to reach or accomplish goals. Merton’s theory also explains how an individual’s social structure prevents an individual from becoming economically fortunate. His theory of modern anomie and strain express that individuals respond to strain in 5 individual ways. Those five ways are conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion. On the other hand Agnew general strain theory, feels strain comes from sources other than economic failure. Agnew general strain theory focuses on a few other types of strain and stress. Like the presentation of a negative stimuli, and the loss of a positive stimuli. Agnew feels that this sort of strain leads to a negative state of mind. The emotions like angry, frustration and fear, lead to crime and criminal behavior. One
In the 1950’s, Cohen (1955) acquired Merton’s theory of crime further by concentrating on gang delinquency within the working class demographic. Cohen used the dominant knowledge of the anomie theory but narrowed its emphasis on this precise subculture and particularized it in order to clarify the features of gang delinquency. Comparable to Merton and Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin (1960) tried to clarify why certain individuals or groups are more likely to involve in criminal activities. They contended that people are strained when they fail to attain financial achievement through legitimate means. Cloward and Ohlin remained in...
Young, J. (1981). Thinking seriously about crime: Some models of criminology. In M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan, & J. Pawson (Eds.), Crime and society: Readings in history and society (pp. 248-309). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
The two theoretical approaches I have chosen to compare to the study of crime are Functionalism and Marxism. I have done so, as I believe both theories are important/ significant to the study of crime and differentiate from each other. I will do this by writing a critique the advantages and disadvantages of both of the theories and thus, resulting in my own personal opinion in the conclusion.
Robert Merton’s Theory of Anomie It is rightfully argued that crime, whether or not in a contemporary society, is an extremely complex and multi-faceted Phenomena that has puzzled academics for many years. Theories that aim to rationalise the causes of crime and understand the origin of criminal behaviour are often criticised for being too biased or deterministic in their research studies. Many have been of great influence and seen to explain (to an extent) the cause of crime but none has fully decoded the mystery of why people commit crime. Merton’s anomie theory aimed at explaining deviance from a sociological perspective as opposed to previous academic theories on crime and criminals.
Winslow, R. W., & Zhang, S. (2008). Contemporary Theories of Crime. Criminology: a global perspective (). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Post-Modern American society is predominantly anomic. Explain why Durkheim would either agree or disagree with this statement. Give specific examples to back up your points. Durkheim introduced the term anomic, which is a breakdown of standards and values or from a lack of purpose or ideas. When a social system is in a state of anomie, the social structure (common values and common meanings) (Coser) are no longer in understandings or accepting, and new values and meanings are not developing (Coser).
Crime exists everywhere. It is exists in our country, in the big cities, the small towns, schools, and even in homes. Crime is defined as “any action that is a violation of law”. These violations may be pending, but in order to at least lower the crime rate, an understanding of why the crimes are committed must first be sought. There are many theories that are able to explain crimes, but three very important ones are rational choice theory, social disorganization theory and strain theory.
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
First let’s define “anomie”, it means “lack of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group.” Based off this Durkheim considers anomie
Featherstone, R., & Deflem, M. (2003). Anomie and strain: Context and consequences of Merton’s two theories. Sociological Inquiry, 73(4), 471-489.
The majority of the South African people are unemployed or else the breadwinner of the family looses the job or dies. In that situation the family has nobody to provide them with the basic needs of life. The children have no money to go to school and that alone increases the rate of poverty as it is known to everybody that if u is uneducated, you have no good chances of getting a well paying job that will sustain you for the rest of your life. In those situations people turn to crime. They believe that it is the only way that will get food on their table, clothes on their back and roofs over their heads. They also believe that the poor must get their needs from the rich, in that way they target the rich people. The increase in the rate of poverty means the increase in the rate of crime.