Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges in conducting qualitative research
Characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research
Characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges in conducting qualitative research
Within a research process, trustworthiness is considered a vital component (Amankwaa, 2016). While quantitative researchers recognize reliability and validity as concepts to explain the usefulness of data obtained, qualitative researchers conceptualize these notions differently (Prion and Adamson, 2014). In an attempt to assess the quality of qualitative research, Lincoln and Guba (1985) have suggested the terms credibility, dependability, confirmability and transferability. According to Crossley (2007), these four key criteria that are drawn from the philosophical concepts of qualitative research are necessary to evaluate the quality of qualitative research particularly its significance, impact, and usefulness. In fact, such mechanisms should be embedded in every step of a research study to assure its trustworthiness and rigor (Creswell and Miller, 2002).
Credibility
Credibility refers to the researcher representation and interpretation of the participant real views (Polit & Beck, 2012).
Though being translucent and explicit during the data analysis process is essential to establish the credibility and trustworthiness of the research (Arriaza et al., 2015), it is
…show more content…
To approach dependability, the author in the proposed study intends to utilize question guideline to guide her in obtaining the inquiries during the interview and to probe the topics when needed (Chai, Putit and Siop, 2016). Moreover, to ensure constancy of the data, colleagues who are familiar with qualitative research will be asked to check the findings and review the participant’s transcriptions (Heydari, Rahnavard and Ghaffari, 2017). At last, to enhance the validity and trustworthiness of the study, the author intends also to have peer debriefing by having the agreement of different individuals other than the researcher on emerging themes and insights (Amankwaa,
Described below is a critical appraisal of a qualitative article by Lisa Booth using the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibility and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007).
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Retrieved from http://www.fhi.org
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods.(3rd ed).Thousand Oaks, Califorinia : Sage Publications, Inc . Retrieved on May 10th, 2014, From http://books.google.com
The type of data collection for a qualitative research study depends on the research design. The qualitative design itself originates out of the disciplines and flow throughout the process of research (Creswell, 2014). Creswell (2014) recommends narrative, phenomenology, ethnography, case study, and grounded theory as common qualitative research methods. These were recommended because of they are popular across the social and health and science research studies. Hays and Woods (2011) asserted that selecting a research tradition congruent with one's research orientation and study purpose, and at the same time, infusing it in all phases of qualitative inquiry, is one of the key criterions for trustworthiness of the research results. Hays and Woods (2011) recommends six qualitative research traditions, including ground theory, phenomenology, consensual qualitative research, ethnography, narratology, and participative action research. Indeed, while there are additional qualitative research methods available, scholars have identified these six qualitative traditions consistently or identified them as emerging and common methods of qualitative research (Hays & Woods, 2011).
Bean’s description of how to be successful in changing someone's mind, specifically among writers to their audience, includes having a credible background. A critical question to ask yourself when examining a writer's credibility, as Bean states is “Do I find this author believable and trustworthy? Why or why not?” Through examination of the writer's background, we can find information that may lean the author's stance one way or the other. In this case, I will be going over Randall Bass pieces of work and looking into his background to find how credible he is and what may influence him on his perspective.
The author could have employed other methods of qualitative research such as, narrative analysis, grounded theory, discourse analysis, data display and analysis, content analysis and quantifying qualitative data and computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAPDAS) (Saunders et al., 2016). Nevertheless, these approaches seem cumbersome sometimes and take a long time to complete (Willig, 1999; Braun and Clarke, 2006 and Smith and Bekker,
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
Validity is one of the most important aspects of a research study ( ). Validity establishes how accurate and credible ( ) the findings are and how thorough one's research is and did the study measure what it intended to measure ( ). There are four main types of validity in research: conclusion validity, internal validity, external validity, and construct validity. This paper will compare and contrast the characteristics of external, internal, and construct validity. It will also identify the threats associated with external and construct validity and the impact of such treats in research.
focused on the key qualitative research methods. For each article review, a brief description, guided by Myers (2013), and a critique, guided Pratt (2009), is provided. A summary of the five articles identifying the research method, data collection technique, data analysis approach and critique is provided in Table 1. The narrative review of each article coupled with figures and tables to organize and visualize thoughts (Pratt, 2009) follows the summary table.
Liamputtong, P. & Ezzy, D., 2005, Qualitative research methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Victoria, pp. 12-31.
Qualitative research was designed as a way to be directly connected with the subjects researched. Participant researchers may choose to merely observe and collect data or to be an active participant. Covert participation has the advantage of reducing the “reactive effects” of the social setting or group (Bachman & Schutt, 2012). Most researchers who use the participation method of research will often strike a balance between participation and observation. Through participation, an observer may gain the trust of the research subjects which can provide more fruitful results. Some research may however be unethical or a violation of law. A good researcher should use prudence beforehand when crafting their research design.
Trustworthiness. Qualitative studies use trustworthiness as a way to measure the reliability and validity of data (Houser, 2015, p. 393). Trustworthiness has four components: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability (Houser, 2015, p. 393). First, credibility is defined as the participant’s reality being accurately represented (Houser, 2015, p. 393). Credibility was represented when the researcher encouraged the participants to share their experiences openly. Once the researcher gathered the new nurses’ experiences and the information was transcribed, the new nurses’ were encouraged to verify the information for accuracy and were allowed to add any additional information to support the experiences if they felt it wasn’t
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
... taken such as online investigation of the prospective interviewee’s about their suitability for the interview, discussion of the research questions and interpretation with the co-researcher and comparison of interviews to predict the result enhancing the accuracy and trustworthiness of the results. To guarantee internal validity, two critical strategies namely method triangulation and data triangulation were employed to understand the underlying relationship between critical intertwined factors. In this research, qualitative method triangulation includes systematic literature review and interviews and qualitative data triangulation for this research involved multiple interviews and multiple data sources. Finally, adequate measures were taken to maintain external validity by explicitly stating the methodological details to enable both generalization and replication.
Qualitative and quantitative researcher’s exhibited conflicting ways of approaching a research. Some researchers prefer qualitative over quantitative and vice-versa. Also, it is common for qualitative and quantitative to be used together in a research. But, both methods when carried out correctly provide good research. Plus, both methods have their own unique differences and characteristics. In this paper I will define three of these characteristics in a quantitative and qualitative research design and discuss and compare their differences. (Smith & Davis, 2010)