Corruption In The White Tiger

1052 Words3 Pages

Aravind Adiga in his psycho-social thriller, The White Tiger, explores issues that modern day India faces, ranging from social mobility to globalization, and morality to corruption. Adiga’s use of an epistolary novel allows his first person narrator to not only provide a commentary on the socio-political and geopolitical problems that India face, but also reflect on the effects of these problems on his own life. Adiga exploits the corruption in India and uses it as device to develop Balram’s character, as he journeys from “the darkness” to “the light”. It is true that Balram becomes increasingly corrupted, and at some points the reader may sympathise with him, however at other points, his actions cannot be justified. Growing up, Balram is tainted …show more content…

The corruption in hospitals, where “doctors can keep their government salary and work in private hospitals”, sees people like Balram’s father die of horrible deaths every day. Dismayed by the lack of respect of the government for its dying citizens, Balram is corrupted by the fact that in the “darkness”, there is no service, not even in death. Balram also claims that “the schoolteacher had stolen our lunch money”, which was for a government funded lunch program. However, Balram doesn’t blame him, which justifies that Balram, from such a young age gives into the idea of corruption saying that “...you can’t expect a man in a dung heap to smell sweet”. In addition to his father and the school teacher, Balram is corrupted by his childhood hero Vijay. Growing up, Balram idolises Vijay for having escaped “the darkness”. However what he is ignorant of is that even though Vijay is in “the light” he is still corrupted by “the darkness”. Balram explains that “Vijay and a policemen beat another men to death”, yet he doesn’t see it as a problem, because he understand that one cannot become successful in such a corrupt system without becoming as corrupt as the system itself. It is here that Adiga asks the question of how are impoverished Indians are expected to refuse to engage in corruption when they live in such poor conditions. Thus, the reader is able to sympathize with Balram’s corruption, …show more content…

Ashok, who is the first person to expose Balram to real corruption and also acts as his ticket out of his impoverished life. Following the hit and run of a pedestrian by Pinky Madam and Mr. Ashok, Balram expresses disgust and rage at the circumstances, where servants are frequently framed for the crimes of their masters, and the servants ' families are so deluded that they actually brag that their boy has been so "loyal". Balram is morally polluted into thinking that to escape such situations, you have to be a part of the corrupt system. Thus he claims that he “was corrupted from a sweet, innocent village fool into a fellow full of, depravity and wickedness, all because they happened in Mr. Ashok first.” Learning from Mr Ashok and his environment, Balram becomes tainted enough to come to the conclusion to murder his master. Balram understand that he must transform himself enough to embrace an alternate system of morality, become the iteration of the Nietzschean ubermensch, which allows him to justify murder and betrayal of family. The reader understands that this alternate system of morals is crucial towards his self-improvement, but at the same time they lose empathy for him when his moral depravity is demonstrated by murdering Mr Ashok. The act of murder for personal gain, or any other reason can never be justified, because murder in the end is murder, it has no

Open Document