Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Issue of corporal punishment
Issue of corporal punishment
Corporal punishment is the use of
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Issue of corporal punishment
Commonly thought within society and within the laws of Australia that to instill discipline and obedience particularly in children, parents feel justified in the use of corporal punishment. Corporal punishment, also known as physical discipline, is the act of physical force towards a child for the sole purpose of disciplinary control and/or correction (Holzer & Lamont 2010). It is used with the intention to cause pain and discomfort to the body of a child, however mild (Holzer & Lamont 2010). The laws surrounding the rights of practicing corporal punishment ultimately breachs the child’s rights in regards to their personal physical and emotional wellbeing. Currently parents can raise the defence of reasonable chastisement. The defence of
reasonable chastisement establishes the justification of physical discipline between parent and child (Naylor & Saunders 2011). However, removing such rationalizations, physical violence regardless of the extent, would be put into line with the already established laws; such as physical violence towards domestic partners (Naylor & Saunders 2011). Monitoring our parenting through implementing laws to suspend the use of corporal punishment, maintains the physical and emotional well-being of children. Indefinitely this will encourage the use of alternative and appropriate parenting techniques allowing the growth, understanding and development of a child’s behavior management, without resorting to physical violence (Holzer & Lamont 2010). In conclusion, the laws concerning the use of corporal punishment should be classed as a criminal offence due to the detrimental effect it has on a child’s physical and emotional well-being.
Reading, Richard. "Speak softly - and forget the stick: corporal punishment and physical abuse." Child: care, health and development (2009): 286-287. Academic Search Premier. Web. 23 April 2011.
Punishment occurs to individuals who break the law. It is also used to maintain the level of crime and to protect community members in Australia. To determine that society is content with maintaining the crime rate, this essay will discuss punishment types given to offenders and how society justifies the use punishment. Additionally, providing a brief overview of the community correction and prions rates to show that communities prefer to incarcerate lawbreakers. Highlighting that crime rates are being maintained by looking at the personal crime rate for assault before concluding that Australian society feel safe enough to allow the criminal justice system to sustain the crime rate.
When describing a physical altercation between two adults, the term is assault and battery. Assault on an individual has more than immediate effects; the effects can last a lifetime in severe cases. In all fifty states, it is a crime to hit, strike or use corporal punishment in any deliberate manner towards any person over the age of eighteen. However, this law does not apply to physical force being used on minors. Spanking, whipping, and paddling are among a few common references to this form of punishment. Physically disciplining children has had many names over the years. No matter which term is used, corporal punishment has a negative impact on every party involved. It is a widely used, socially accepted method of discipline. “Approximately 94% of three and four-year old children have been spanked in the past year (Slade & Winssow 1321). Although spanking is a widespread practice, it is becoming more controversial. The negative effects of spanking greatly outweigh the benefits. Spanking is a socially tolerated view promoting abusive patterns, and has a negative psychological impact in teaching children that pain, fear, and confusion promote conformability.
If your family is like 90% of the population, then you have been disciplined using corporal punishment or have discipled your children with it. The topic of whether parents should use corporal punishment has been debated for years, and it is illegal in the United States to use physical punishment; however, each state’s law on corporal punishment varies and all allow some form of physical punishment. New studies greatly question whether corporal punishment should be used when discipling children. Parents or guardians should not be allowed to use corporal punishment because it causes anti-social behavior, it increases aggression, and it causes cognitive problems.
Children are like flowers, if well taken care of they will glow. If ignored or tortured, they will damage or die. Child discipline is one of the most significant basics of successful parenting. Today, many people have this belief that physical abuse is in no way a solution to helping children recognize between right and wrong. Since generations children have been learnt the art of discipline through physical punishment. Often this approach to disciplining has resulted in two consequences, one is where the child becomes more generous and is able to obey what he or she has been stated, or the other which more often results in children developing a sense of suffering and wish to revolution. I believe that sometimes parents are caught in a situation when children annoyed all boundaries of discipline and spanking is the only actual answer. Therefore, it is essential to do spanking for child discipline since it is the important element of successful parenting.
"All people have the right to protection of their physical integrity, and children are people too”(Hunt). Children are physically punished to correct their negative behaviors; however, there has been a dispute about whether or not it is acceptable for parents to spank their children as a form of punishment since children have the same rights to be respected like adults. Most adults would argue that it is acceptable for parents to physically punish their children with spanking because there are benefits to discipling children using this method, but even though the opposing argument is valid, spanking children as punishment has long term effects that can negatively change the child’s behavior. Documentation presents reasons why it is not okay for parents to spank their children as the only form of punishment.
Dear Sir, I am writing in reply to the recent publication of an item on the topic of corporal punishment. I do not agree that it is needed to bring discipline back into our schools. It is assumed that a child who has been caned would be less likely to commit another offence , but this was never proved and , in fact , one theory holds that severe corporal punishment increases the likelihood of future offences. There are better ways to discipline students than hitting them. Some parents may believe that spanking a child may be beneficial but apart from being potentially dangerous physically, it can lower their self esteem, hinder their academic abilities and may even contribute to disruptive and violent behaviour. Some pupils may feel so afraid to go to school that they are tempted to play truant. Over the past few years we have become more and more obsessive over bringing our lives into the twenty first century and now , here you are telling us that we should bring back corporal punishment, a system which is looked upon as old fashioned ! Discipline should begin in the home . Parents have and should accept the task of instilling in their children respect for right and wrong, respect for others and all the other basic lessons of living, working, playing and learning with others. They should try to teach him to control himself and take responsibility for his actions and their consequences .Unfortunately, because some parents find it difficult to do this from infancy , the teachers role is all the more difficult. Still, restoring this rule is not the way to resolve theses difficulties. Get to children in infancy and their early years and their lives will be shaped more fully for future growth. Restoring their teachers’ power to hit them across the bottom or knuckles doesn’t fit that picture. Forget corporal punishment. Roald Dahl’s book entitled “Boy” tells about the times when corporal punishment was allowed to take place in all schools. A passage from the book tells of how , aged nine, Dahl was caned six times for talking during prep. Even though he had had a perfectly good excuse he got the same punishment another child would probably have got for defacing school property or stealing. I think that this reinforces my earlier suggestion that teachers may take advantage of their authority and harass pupils they may have taken a dislike to.
Corporal punishment defined by psychologists is physical force that inflicts pain without injury for correctional purposes (Donnelly) but children between the ages of four to twelve define it very differently. To them, it is the cane, the belt and the raised hand which has taught them discipline and fear. To them, it is the scars and the bruises which have become reminders of their wrong doings. To them, it is the measure taken by their parents to form the “model citizen”. With the well-being and moral internalization of these children as the top priority, many people have spoken against this practice and a few governments outlawing it. Nonetheless, the fight to ban domestic corporal punishment is not over on the grounds of which it can lead to abuse, is an ineffective form of correctional education and inhibits child development.
Hyman (1989) says corporal punishment refers to intentional application of physical pain as a method of changing behavior. It includes a wide variety of methods such as hitting, slapping, punching, kicking, pinching, shaking, choking, use of various objects (wooden paddles, belts, sticks, pins, or others), painful body postures, use of electric shock, use of excessive exercise drills, or prevention of urine or stool limination (p.161).
The American Psychological Association has stated, “The use of corporal punishment by adults having authority over children is likely to train children to use
The debate whether the use of physical punishment (e.g. spanking, slapping) should be used as a form of discipline is a controversial one. Some parents believe that there is nothing wrong with physical punishment, while some parents believe that physical punishment should only be used in certain instances (e.g. spanking or slapping a child for touching or playing with something dangerous), and then there are parents who believe that a child should never be physically punished. While most people agree that getting physical (hitting) with someone is wrong, physically punishing a child continues to be uses as an acceptable form of discipline. Most parents use physical punishment as a means to stop a child from engaging in unacceptable behavior or to get a child to comply(Gershoff, 2010), such reasons may be effective in the short term, however a parent should not only be focusing on the short term they should be focusing on the long term results. The goals of a parent should be promoting good behavior with rewards thus producing long term compliance. Physical punishment decreases positive behaviors thus affecting a child’s behavior opposite to what the parents intended.
In South Africa it is still legal for parents to make use of corporal punishment in order to discipline their children. The reason therefore is that a defence exists in South African common-law for parents when a claim based on assault is raised. This defence is known as reasonable disciplinary chastisement and it is seen as ‘n ground of justification. Physical assault, such as corporal chastisement is seen as unlawful. In the following discussion current legislation on the subject, world views and the interpretation of the Constitution will be examined to determine whether or not this defence has a future in South African law.
Corporal punishment has been a part of family life for thousands of years, taking its place in societies all over the globe. From wood switches to thick leather belts, all sorts of tools have been used to discipline naughty children. No one has ever really examined the question of whether or not this form of punishment is productive or counterproductive. In examining the situation of whether or not this form of punishment is warranted or even what one might consider proper, a sample situation must be examined. Let’s say, for argument’s sake that a little boy named Johnny just threw a temper tantrum and threw his bowl of Coco CrispiesÓ all over the kitchen floor. Now there are two things his mother could do at this point to correct him. She could either use corporal punishment, taking it’s form in nearly abusive words or a few backhand’s across his face, or she could simply have a talk with him and explain why his behavior was wrong and why he should not do it again. Now which one would accomplish more? Obviously, simply talking to little Johnny would ac...
Corporal punishment means to educate by implement of physical pain on learners in order to enhance their ability of studying. As we know, students will often follow the instructions which given by their instructor. However, if they don’t, many instructors are likely to introduce the corporal punishment such as hitting, slapping, spanking and kicking rather than promotes the oral education method to force their students to have a better performance. Gradually, corporal punishment have become a widely known phenomenon all over the world. According to the Department of Education’s 2006 Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC), it clearly showed that a total of 223,190 students without disabilities received corporal punishment in that year around the
Corporal punishment makes many students feel helpless and humiliated, especially if the corporal punishment is administered publicly. Imagine if you were viciously spanked for simply being late to class or forgetting to do an assignment, and you got horrible marks and bruises from it which throbbed every time you sat down, bent over or reached out to grab things. It would hurt you even more if the discipline was administered in front of a lot of students, who are snickering or whispering about you behind your back. Corporal punishment also makes many students frustrated and angry. Additionally, it degrades the students’ self-esteem. According to “Corporal Punishment of Children in US Public Schools,” an article that was written by the Human Rights Watch, “Some students become depressed or withdrawn, while others become immune to the incessant violence, accepting it as a part of their daily lives.” Studies have shown that frequently