Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discussing on copyright
Discussing on copyright
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discussing on copyright
INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT
Copyright law confers upon the owner of the work a bundle of exclusive rights in respect of the reproduction of the work and other acts which enables the owner to get financial benefits by exercising such rights. If any of these acts relating to the work is carried out by a person other than the owner without a license from the owner or a competent authority under the act, it constitutes infringement of copyright in the work. Since copyright is granted only for a limited period, there will be no infringement if the reproduction of the work or other acts concerned is carried out after the term of copyright is expired. Accordingly, the type of acts which will constitute infringement will also depend upon the nature of the work. The exclusive rights granted under the act extend also to a translation or adaptation of the work or to substantial part thereof. Thus copyright will be infringed if a substantial part of the work is reproduced. What amounts to a substantial part of the work will depend upon the circumstances of the case.
Since the forms of creative works are numerous, that is literary, dramatic, musical and artistic etc., the acts which would constitute infringement would depend upon the nature of the work. Section 51 of the Copyright Act defines infringement of a copyright not specifically with respect to each kind of creative work, but in general terms. The general principle is that no infringement of the plaintiff’s rights takes place where a defendant has bestowed such mental labour upon what he has borrowed and has subjected it to such revision and alteration as to produce an original result. The defendant is not at liberty to take away the result of another man’s labour or the benefits ar...
... middle of paper ...
...the situations, however generally, Indian courts have applied both qualitative and quantitative test of substantiality and the literal number of words copied has not been held to be a determinative factor. The courts have recognized that the terminable quantum of extracts or quotations will depend upon the facts of each case.
As we have seen, any unauthorized use of a copyrighted work may amount to infringement of copyright. However, the copyright law allows people to make some free uses of the copyrighted works. In India, the list of these free uses has been laid down in Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The rationale behind these free uses is to strike a balance between the interests of the copyright owners and the interests of the society at large. We will discuss in detail the concept of these exceptions to copyright infringement in the following chapters.
Throughout Australia, copyright is established under the ‘Commonwealth Legislation’, the ‘Copyright Act 1968’. This is updated periodically for the purpose of taking into account, the changes in technology, where International Treaties can also apply. Regulations that specify matter related to the operation of the Copyright Act are the ‘Copyright
The central message of this text is that increasingly, outdated copyright laws are being manipulated and put to use in a ludicrous manner. This is resulting in the suppression of people’s ability to generate and share their own creative expressions.
“Copyright is a fundamental right of ownership and protection common to all of the arts” (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 8). “It is a form of intellectual Property (IP)” and it gives the owner exclusive rights to the copyright (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 11).
...oint out its defects. The second condition is explained in the latter case. In that case the court while holding that the counter drama in question was of the nature of a parody as it was a criticism directed at the original play relied upon three factors to derive that conclusion- a) the quantum of the matter taken from the original work in relation to the criticisms, b) the purpose and c) the likelihood of competition. Therefore through this decision the Kerala HC concluded that as long as the original work is copied for the purpose of criticizing it does not amount to improper use and thus would constitute fair dealing. On the other hand if a parody is made by adopting the same theme but is performed in a completely different manner from that of the original then the question of copyright violation itself will not arise as ideas and themes cannot be copyrighted.
Over the past decade the societal view of creative society has greatly changed due to advances in computer technology and the Internet. In 1995, aware of the beginning of this change, two authors wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing diametrically opposed views on how this technological change would take form, and how it would affect copyright law. In the article "The Emperor's Clothes Still Fit Just Fine" Lance Rose hypothesized that the criminal nature of copyright infringement would prevent it from developing into a socially acceptable practice. Thus, he wrote, we would not need to revise copyright law to prevent copyright infringement. In another article, Entitled "Intellectual Value", Esther Dyson presented a completely different view of the copyright issue. She based many her arguments on the belief that mainstream copyright infringement would proliferate in the following years, causing a radical revision of American ideas and laws towards intellectual property. What has happened since then? Who was right? This paper analyzes the situation then and now, with the knowledge that these trends are still in a state of transformation. As new software and hardware innovations make it easier to create, copy, alter, and disseminate original digital content, this discussion will be come even more critical.
Terms and Laws have gradually change overtime dealing with different situations and economic troubles in the world in general. So then dealing with these issues the workplace has become more complex with little or no rights to privacy. Privacy briefly explained is a person’s right to choose whether or not to withhold information they feel is dear to them. If this something will not hurt the business, or its party members then it should be kept private. All employees always should have rights to privacy in the workplace. Five main points dealing with privacy in public/private structured businesses are background checks, respect of off duty activities/leisure, drug testing, workplace search, and monitoring of workplace activity. Coming to a conclusion on privacy, are there any limits to which employers have limitations to intrusion, dominance on the employee’s behavior, and properties.
In today’s society with the blogs, the gossip sites and the other forms of social media, confidentiality is a thing of the past. However, for, physicians and other health professionals, they are held to a higher standard to maintain a level of ethics and confidentiality for their patients. Confidentiality is a major duty for a health professional, but is there ever a time to where it is okay to tell what a patient says in confident? What if the patient is a minor, or a senior citizen or someone who is mentally challenged? What if a patient is being abused or wants to commit suicide? Does it matter if it is a nurse, or a dentist, or a psychologist or is all medical professional held to the same moral standard? What roles does a consent form or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act plays in the medical world in being confidentiality? I would like to explore Confidentiality and the moral effects it has on the health profession.
Is it educators who should be blamed for the huge number of students paying for everything from one page responses to their professors to complete thesis dissertations. Is it the lazy or incapable students fault? Aren’t the “Papermill” companies that supply the resources that actually complete the work the ones to blame? I think it's fairly obvious that this kind of business is unethical. . I would never think about paying someone to write a paper for me, because then I would be cheating myself out of my own education. While we are pointing fingers, maybe the blame should be on the parents of the students for not teaching them any morals and letting them think that cheating is acceptable.
Copyright, in its first form, was first introduced in 1710 with a British statute of Anne. Since this time copyright laws have changed to remain current, and have grown into an international agreement by many countries around the globe.
As society has progressed, there have been many new innovative and unbelievable developments in almost all aspects of life that have ultimately created an impact. More specifically, advancements in technology have rather had a much larger and intense impact on society as it continues to grow. Technology has allowed for many great and useful applications that has made life much easier and convenient. However, many aspects of technology have given a rise to a number of social and ethical issues, causing numerous debates and concerns. One of the more prominent concerns deals with the issue of privacy rights.
In the United States it is illegal for one to plagiarize the copyrighted work of another human being. Not only does plagiarism violate legal statutes, but it also infringes on longstanding morals and ethics.
Alexandra Kaye 5/3/14 LAQ 2 IB Psychology SL. Q: Discuss two errors in attribution. Within the social-cultural level of analysis, researchers study the social context in which behavior occurs. Humans have the natural need to understand why things happen. In order to explain why things happen, humans use attribution.
Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement are two terms that mean different things yet are routinely mentioned as synonyms for each other. This is not the case. The underlying reasoning for people who choose to plagiarize and infringe on copyrights involve some of the same ethics and morals, but from a legal standpoint these terms mean different things. This paper will point out the similarities and differences between the two terms. It will first give some meaning and perspective behind each term then it will go into the details of what each term means. It will point out the types of plagiarism that routinely show in academia and what is covered under Copyright law protection. It will go on to compare and contrast the two concepts.
Plagiarism is taking someone else’s work and turning it in as if it was your own. This could be taking information from an online article, a TV show, a song, a book, or even something as simple as taking credit for someone’s idea. You must cite your sources internally to avoid plagiarizing a paper (lib). Moreover, ethics are rules of behavior set forth by what we think is right and wrong (Webster). Ethics are usually formed during childhood when a kid is learning to determine the difference between right and wrong. However, everyone comes from a different background, so often the moral “rights and wrongs” people have cause heated arguments. Having said this, ethics are not laws. Often an action is legal but unethical, or illegal but ethical (niehs).
A copyright is a legal means that gives the creator of mythical, imaginative, musical, or other creative work the solitary right to publish and sell that work. Copyright owners have the right to manage the reproduction of their work, including the right to receive imbursement for that reproduction. An author may contribute or sell those rights to others, including publishers or recording corporations. Breach of a copyright is called copyright