Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on transformational leadership theory
Transformational leadership theory challenges
Philosophy of transformational leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on transformational leadership theory
4. Contingency Theories(1960's):
This modern theory discusses that there no specific method of leading, and every leadership should be based on specific situations, which can signify that some individuals who might perform at minimal performance when they are out of their element, but they might perform at the maximum level in certain areas.
To a certain degree contingency theories are additions of the trait theory, in the implication that the human characteristics are related to the situation that the leaders face, and apply their leadership. The contingency theories accept the idea that leaders are more expected to articulate their leadership characteristic when their followers will be responsive to them.
Who is the effective leader?
Every
…show more content…
MacGregor Burns, and developed by Bernard Bass. The transformational leadership model emphasize the visionary thinking and transpiring changes, rather than management processes that are designed for preserving steadily improve for present performance.
Effective leader who is doing the following
…show more content…
Moreover the leaders think about the changing industry environment, and try to analyze, understand and predict how their competitors will likely to behave in the industry with every change. The organization leaders look at how the organization can successfully innovate, and shape their strategies and their business to compete and succeed in the market. The vision can be tested by appropriate market research, on their side and the market side also, to find the risk possibilities, and the best way to reduce it or avoid it. Therefore, leadership demand a hard work, like planning step ahead, problem solving, and not being satisfied with what is in the table, and how things are, but to try to improve for the best.
After leaders develop their visions, they must make them convincing, and persuasive or as known as a compelling vision which is known as the vision that people can see, feel, understand and embrace. Therefore the effective leaders will give a rich and colorful image of what the future will be after their visions have been
The theory reduces the expectations from the leader, instead focuses on matching the leader to a task
“Transformational leadership builds on top of transactional leadership and produces levels of follower effort and performance that go beyond what would occur with a transactional approach alone” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 419). Since a transformational leader applauds resourcefulness, I aspire toward this leadership. Although the Fielder contingency model was “the first comprehensive contingency model for leadership” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 392), “Fielder has reconceptualized his original theory” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 395). In Fielder’s original theory decisions were based on context and changed according to the situation (Fischer). Interestingly, his advanced theory, cognitive resource theory, asserts “it’s the level of stress
My impression of leadership is the ability to motivate, inspire, set a visualization, connect, and lead by example. To become a successful leader you have to be able to convince your followers that you are trustworthy of being followed. During this semester, we have learned many, if not all of the major leadership theories and how they play a role in our everyday lives. But personally, a few of these leadership models caught me and intrigued me the whole semester so much that this paper is going to predominately be referenced about them. For example, the proposed framework that organizes leadership theories based on each theory 's focus and approach. Focus is referred to as whether or not leadership is viewed as a set of traits or actions.
You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink is a proverb I have heard since I was young. Leadership is the skill of influencing people to accomplish goals (Huber, 2014). In today’s world with policy and technological changes the leaders must use their leadership skills to not only get the horse to the water, have him drink, but also do it with a smile an invite others to join him. Leaders use a variety of styles to accomplish their goals. I will discuss the leadership style that I utilize most often, how my style relates to leadership theories and the work type environment it is most useful in.
To see success in the CrysTel initiative, a new frontier in understanding organizational change is necessary to translate successfully implemented changes into real organizational benefits. This can be accomplished through a systematic analysis of "cross level linkages," connections between departments or business units and the organization as a whole. This paper will present three leadership theories believed to be most effective for CrysTel's change initiative. Each style will be compared to others chosen and some not chosen. Strengths and weaknesses of each style will also be presented as will recommendations for further success.
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
On leadership is a book which deserve to be read by us. Although this book use a precise formation to help us to examine a widely comprehensive aspects of the leadership, there are some drawbacks. Gardner cited different examples to talk about leadership, but just in a particular area, that is political area. So,
The leadership is a privilege and it is such a privilege and an honor which will carry the tremendous responsibility which will inspire others to direct them to accomplish goals and vision of the organization. Leadership is about influencing the people, by producing direction, purpose and motivating in order to accomplish the mission, vision and improving the organization. The leadership philosophy is evolved based on the experiences, both positive and negative, in most of the initiatives and activities that we undertake. It is also one among the collaboration and teamwork within which the team members can utilize each other’s strengths to counter the weaknesses of the individuals. By observing, introspecting and experimenting we can developed a leadership paradigm which is inclusive, collaborative and proactive. We can develop the ability to recognize which will approach in order to reach the productive conclusion. The great leaders know their limitations and are capable at utilize their strengths and also the strengths of others to compensate.
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
Contingency Theory “Contingency theory is a class of behavioral theory claiming that there is no best way to organize a corporation, lead a company, or make decisions” (Pfeffer, 1997). There is no simple or one right way to run things. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, two men named Henri Fayrol and Frederick Taylor continued the study of contingency theory. Research in the 1970’s dealt with the organizational structures and leadership styles for different situations (Thompson, 2005).
A brief description of transformational leadership, according to James MacGregor Burns, is a new paradigm
“Situational theory tends to focus more on the behaviours that the leader should adopt, given situational factors (often about follower behaviour), whereas contingency theory takes a broader view that includes contingent factors about leader capability and other variables within the situation”
In the contingency leadership theories both the task and the follower’s characteristics are used to determine which behavior is better suited for effective leadership. Within the contingency approach are several factors to consider: the quality of relationships, tasks and activities to be performed, perceptions of the leader based on history, the motivation of both the leader and the follower, and personal characteristics influencing the situation (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). The first contingency leadership theories studies were conducted by Fred Fiedler, a leadership researcher and the earliest pioneer in the field of contingency leadership, who focused on how situational variables interact with leader personality and behavior (Contingency Approach to Management, 2009); from these studies he developed the contingency leadership model. The contingency leadership model is used to determine whether a person’s leadership style is task– or relationship-oriented, and if the situation (leader-member relationships, task structure and position power) matches the leader’s style to maximize performance (Lussier & Achua, 2010). Fielder discovered that leadership effectiveness was dependent on the factors of the leader–follower relationship, task structure, and leader position.
Leadership theories spread throughout history. these thoeries are varied from one another by which aspect is beleived to understand the leader fully. US academic environments defines leadership as “a process of social influence in which a person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task" By referencing this assignment the reader will get a sound knowledge about leadership theories, leadership styles as well as leadership trends of the millennial.
More often organizations are getting into bigger risks in the market with their leaders in nowadays economy. The resistance to change is a reason why organizations trying harder to keep earlier recognized reputation within clients and community. The theme of leadership is relevant for each person as it occurs almost to everyone during the lifetime or to those who at least were a part of a team.