Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
No school uniform policy position paper
School uniform policy essays
Strength and weakness of cultural influence on behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: No school uniform policy position paper
Authoritative Figures Impacting Decision Making
What is the effect of an authoritative figure on decision making and behavior? If an authoritative figure is placed at the gate during lunch the amount of 10th and 9th graders that leave campus will decrease due to social influence, conformity, and compliance. As part of a society that holds absolute respect for authority, the students of the school will have an unquestioning obedience towards these figures thus decreasing the amount of students that leave campus. When students view other students not going off campus they will set aside there want for food in order to abide by the desires of their peers, this is called conformity. When figures of authority demand action of the students and the
…show more content…
This is the result of a population’s desire to be as ubiquitous as the majority, however the chance of conformity does increases with population Asch (1951). People are more likely to obey set rules when an authoritative figure is present, for example, a person may speed when the road is open, but if that person saw a cop he/she would follow the rules and go the speed limit, knowing that speeding can result in getting pulled over and cause the person to obtain a ticket. Conformity like peer pressure, can cause people to disregard their own morals and instead follow the preferences of others and conform to their standards, regardless of their own . A study done with conformity showed that if only one person fails to conform, the rate of conformity drops by 25% Asch (1956). So just one person following the rules can relieve pressure of other people who give in. In some cultures, conformity is an important part of society, for example, a school that requires uniforms and mandatory attendance. In a school like CCA where independence is cultivated, the rates of conformity will be lower. At CCA where rules are normally not broken, students will stay on campus to conform with their peers instead of breaking the conformity and leaving campus, however, when the majority of people leave school and go off campus for lunch, the conformity is increased because people feel more obligated to go with the …show more content…
There’s different factors that influence why people break the rules, or don’t, some of which include: social influence, conformity, and obedience. Within these topics, there are other aspects that persuade decision making, both when an authoritative person is and is not present, such as the amount of unanimity, how much surveillance is used, and what is socially acceptable. Less freshmen and sophomores will break the rules and leave school campus with an authoritative figure present, because people are more likely to obey rules while being watched, further, the norm is changed to staying on campus because no one can leave, and people are more obedient knowing that there are negative consequences if they break the
... More people followed their direct orders and continued shocking the learners to the very highest voltage. Stanley Milgram’s experiment shows societies that more people abide by the rules of an authority figure under any circumstances rather than follow their own natural instincts. With the use of his well-organized article that appeals to the general public, direct quotes and real world examples, Milgram’s idea is very well-supported. The results of the experiment were in Milgram’s favor and show that people are obedient to authority figures.
Compliance is “a form of social influence involving direct requests from one person to another”, whilst obedience is “a form of social influence in which one person simply orders one or more others to perform some actions” (Baron, R.A. & Branscombe, N.R., 2014, p. 255). These two terms are methods of social influence, particularly prominent in Milgram’s study on obedience. Milgram’s study is a psychological experiment focusing on whether or not people would obey authority figures, even when the instructions given were morally wrong. Back then the terms of the experiment were completely acceptable, but due to the strict controls of contemporary psychology today, this test would be impossible to repeat. The trial breaches many ethical factors as the participant (teacher) is essentially forced to administer electric shocks every time the learner makes a mistake.
It is very common to see conformity among young people, especially when large groups of young people are constantly around each other. School is one example where conformity is rampant. For some reason people tend to gravitate towards what others are doing. In Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel, Never Let Me Go, the characters are no different from any other young person in that they tend to conform. Ishiguro shows this conformity to prove that conformity stems from the want to fit in and pure ignorance. At Hailsham, the students conform just to fit in with the rest of the students, but they also conform because they do not know any better.
So far, conformity has been discussed in terms of group identification and social roles. However, individuals also tend to change prior beliefs to seek group acceptance. Asch (1951) investigated the effect of group pressure on conformity by asking participants to make a line judgment with seven confederates that gave the same obviously incorrect answer. Yet, 37% of participants conformed by giving the incorrect majority answer, whereas in the absence of group pressure, less than 1% of participants conformed (Asch, 1951). There are implications on normative influence as individuals, despite knowing the majority opinion was incorrect, may conform to avoid social punishment (Breckler et al., 2005). However, Turner and colleagues (1987) argued
In society, it's difficult to go against the norm. Individuals are compelled to act a specific way, or look a specific way in order to be accepted. For instance, teenagers may encounter pressure from their peers to partake in specific exercises that may not be moral, since they feel the need to fit in. This weight of conformity isn't just present in reality; it can be found in literature as well. The story "St. Lucy’s Home For Girls Raised by Wolves" by Karen Russell depicts that in order to conform to society, individuals abandon their selflessness and compassion and become selfish and apathetic.
Pursuing a personal desire and choosing to conform to societal expectations is a challenging decision to make. A person must decide if their personal desire is worth risking the shame and judgment of others or is conforming the route to take because it is easier. When pursuing a personal desire one must ask itself if it is worth the hardship to accomplish one's desire or if it is best left alone and repressed, in hopes of finding comfort in conformity. John Laroche from The Orchid Thief expresses his personal desire without a care for conformity or societal expectations. Nevertheless, Laroche never stopped being strange as he grew up with fascinations of many objects such as orchids, turtles, old mirrors and fish tanks.
“Social conformity has been practiced in societies around the world since ancient times,” and the reason it is so effective is that humans have an inherent need to be accepted as part of a group (Sadat). Furthermore, Hossna Sadat reports that:
The definition of conformity is the compliance with social standards and laws in a particular culture, environment, society and time. If this occurs the individual changes their attitudes, beliefs or actions to align more holistically with those in the surrounding groups and environment, as a result of real or perceived group pressure. This is ultimately a direct result of the power which a group has over the individual. There are two types of conformity, normative conformity, and informational conformity. The motivation behind normative conformity is the desire to be liked and accepted in society. This is most widely known as peer pressure. For example, a student begins smoking because their peers
Solomon Asch developed and ran an experiment regarding the power of conformity that affects most populations. Psychologists have been attempting to fully understand the mental workings behind why people are so easily pressured into following others for the longest time. The main focus of psychologists, is to figure and understand what the causes are behind social conformity. Numerous terms are brought up when studying conformity. The “unspoken rules or guidelines for behavior in a group” (Hock 293) are labeled as social norms. When individuals are placed in large groups, the tendency is to lean with whatever the majority of the group thinks. The regular behavior of the individual tends to readjust to appease the superior crowd.
Conformity and Obedience in Society The desire to be accepted and belong to a group is an undeniable human need. But how does this need affect an individual? Social psychologists have conducted numerous experiments and concluded that, through various forms of social influence, groups can change their members’ thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In her essay “Group Minds,” Doris Lessing discusses our paradoxical ability to call ourselves individuals and our inability to realize that groups define and influence us.
Elliot Aronson (2012) provides a definition of conformity, two social psychological processes that underlie a conformity and cited examples of reasons why people conform in the book, The Social Animal. Aronson (2012) defines a conformity as “a change in a person’s behavior or opinion as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people” (p.19). In accordance with Aronson’s (2012) definition of conformity, people do conform owing to the social influence, which are two main social psychological processes: belonging and getting information.
In every society, there is conformity and nonconformity, although we may not notice it. Conformity is when someone is doing the same thing as others because they do not want to be the only one doing differently. Example, if there was a whole class raising their hands would you want to be the only one with your hand down, no so you would raise it with the rest of the class to not look like you don't know anything. This is called social pressures it when a large group is doing something and you're the only one not then you want to be doing whatever that large group is doing.
As far back as we have the ability to look, it seems that figures in humanity have always been fighting against conformity, against submission, against resignation. It is in our nature as humans to strive to do what we believe to be the best and for many, this comes in the form of non-conformity or rebellion. Many authors over time have wrestled with this subject, from Henry David Thoreau with the government to Quincy Troupe with the educational system. The educational system is a very important factor in the idea of conformity as it is mandatory and strict and monotonous; basically a plethora of words that come to mind when one thinks of "conformity" and "obedience". Why is it that in such a fast paced, ever-changing world most of us regard those who choose not to conform; the "hippies", the "mavericks", "bohemians", the "vagabonds", and "vagrants", with an air of arrogance?
Conformity is defined as the compliance with social standards and laws in a particular culture, environment, society and time. If this occurs the individual changes their attitudes, beliefs or actions to align more holistically with those in the surrounding groups and environment, as a result of real or perceived group pressure. This is ultimately a direct result of the power which a group has over the individual. There are two types of conformity, normative conformity, and informational conformity. Normative conformity is motivated by the desire to be liked and accepted in society. This is most widely known as peer pressure. For example, a student begins smoking because their peers are smoking,
Individuals change because of their environment and from their influences. Society cannot define neither a good or bad individual because it is impossible. In surveys, the results showed that students did not follow authority figures but followed peers. In the studies, individuals followed authority figures without question. The weakness of this study is that most individuals do not realize their behavior changes when going to a different environment or situation. Another weakness of this study is that the data does not fully represent everyone. The study only represents a small portion of a college campus. The strength of this study shows that individuals are more influenced into following their peers instead of being told what to do. The limitations of the study are that human behavior is a characteristic that is hard to understand. One second a person can be good, and the next second he could be doing evil deeds. This study needs further research and should take a closer look at how individuals are more willing to follow their peers than an authority figure. The study shows that anyone can be good or bad. Society has painted the image that individuals need to be accepted by others and are willing to forget themselves in order to get accepted. The study shows that the students that were surveyed, did not follow the rules of society. The students stuck with their morals and behavior. Society paints the images of individuals but