Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influence foreign policy terrorism
Impact of global terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media influence foreign policy terrorism
Conflict Theory Explains Isis:
The PBS Frontline Documentary ISIS in Afghanistan tells the story of individuals on the other side of the world via the PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION of Najibullah Quraishi. Mr. Quraishi investigates the ROLE INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM plays in the everyday life of the Afghani people. This type of existence is a prime example of the sociological philosophy of the CONFLICT THEORY. The assumption of this theory according to the text is that society is a system of diverse groups with conflicting values and interests, vying with each other for power, wealth and other valued resources. The goal of ISIS is to rule over not only the Middle East but also the world, similar to the American concept of the POWER ELITE MODEL. ISIS’
…show more content…
IDEOLOGY is a system of religious PREJUDICE aimed at creating one true religion. The terrorist’s way of thinking creates a SOCIAL PROBLEM for all citizens, not just the people of Afghanistan. This way of life has an adverse effect on the families, the children and the future of this country. The first victims of Isis and terrorism are the families of Eastern Afghanistan, approximately seventeen thousand of them according to the video. These families were forced to leave their homes and sometimes each other in an attempt to survive. The video shows a man by the name of Abjohn, who fled his home after ISIS killed a group of elders in his village. He describes how his life was peaceful until a unit of ISIS soldiers took over and generated unpleasantness for the people. He would like to fight the various militant groups but he understands this is not his own PERSONAL PROBLEM, but it is much bigger, it’s a world problem. The soldier’s AGGRESSION and DISCRIMINATION was not only directed toward the adults in the village but the children as well. Several children in the film described being verbally assaulted by the soldiers as well as, observing other children from their village, who dared go outside being struck by them. Abjohn escaped the mistreatment along with his family and their animals. Understanding the future of their children was in jeopardy, the parents of other village begged Abjohn to take their children with him to ensure their survival. These are just a few examples of the impact ISIS and terrorism has on the families of Eastern Afghanistan. The next victims of ISIS and terrorism are the influences they have on the children of Afghanistan.
This negative control over the children is a form of EXPLOITATION. These children are forced to know only anger and hatred. The life of a child growing up in Afghanistan revolves around the awareness of VIOLENCE and WAR as part of their every day reality. The DIFFERENTAIL ASSOCIATION THEORY explains how individuals become criminals by associating with other criminal individuals; this is not unlike the NORM for the children of Afghanistan. Propaganda videos from Syria and Iraq exhibit the killings of individuals whom they consider to be infidels. These videos are shown to young children in order to groom them as future warriors. These propaganda videos also demonstrate ISIS military school training practices. The local village children are shown these videos on a daily basis in turn to indoctrinate them into their potential. Children as young as three are taught Islamic State, which is a militant movement that “follows a distinctive variety of Islam whose beliefs about the path to the Day of Judgment matter to its strategy, and can help the West know its enemy and predict its behavior”, this according to an article by Graeme Wood called “What Isis Really Wants”. This video also clearly demonstrates the GENDER ROLES expected of these young children, as the girls were directed to sit behind the boys in the classroom setting. ISIS and terrorism are taking away the innocence of …show more content…
these children and preparing them to become the future insurgents and the latest casualties of a skewed philosophy. The last victim of ISIS and terrorism is the country of Afghanistan itself. This group is creating a CULTURE of immoral citizens whose VALUES of sacrificing themselves to gain eternal life in order rid the world of what they call unbelievers. The people have lost their AUTONOMY by exchanged one tyrannical group for another. The SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS caused by the invasion of these groups only enhances the ALIENATION felt by the people of Afghanistan. Men often seek employment with ISIS because of their ability to pay seven hundred dollars in monthly wages. This is considered a lot of money according to Afghans standards. The ATMOSPHERE in Afghanistan is volatile due to the fighting amongst ISIS, the Taliban, and even the local government. In the film Quraishi watches an ISIS propaganda video of on of their many executions. After driving the Taliban out of one of Afghanistan’s many villages, the captured ten village elders who were then taken to a remote hillside and forced to kneel on explosives. He watches in disbelief as ISIS lights the fuse and kills each and every one of those ten men. This type of cruelty is not only relegated to the Taliban or ISIS but to the local government too. One gentleman’s ATTITUDE towards the Afghani government soldiers was that the soldier’s treatment of the local people was not an improvement over the Taliban or ISIS. The country of Afghanistan knows only heartbreak and devastation at the hands of radical groups intent on taking over ensuring their ongoing victimization. The ISIS’ mentality is to bring their message of religious superiority around the world, which negatively affects the future of the families, the children, and the Afghan country.
Their aim is to have networks all over the world and to continue with terrorism in the Middle East and to bring DOMESTIC TERRORISM to the United States by way of kidnapping and brutally executing the infidels who stand in their way. The unfortunate reality is these ideas are brought to you by men who seek to gain power and resources. ISIS cares nothing about the people or the communities in which they conquer, they are pursuing riches and eternal
life.
ISIS has been known to employ the use of children in warfare and over 30,000 children have been abducted into the Lord’s Resistance Army for military purposes. It was my intent from the first conception of my piece to explore the idea of child soldiers in a way that would resonate with an Australian audience, and generate thought surrounding an issue that is too often forgotten simply because it is not prevalent in our own society. Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland was a story that I wished to thread subtly through my piece, in order to develop an idea of childhood wonder and curiosity, as well as a loss of innocence. The significance of Alice’s name is not entirely clear without the opening quote from Carroll’s Behind the Looking Glass (“Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do just to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!”).
Likewise, Goodwin illustrates how the use of categorical terrorism can be seem being used by Al-Qaida during the attacks of 9/11. Nonetheless, it is evident that Al-Qaida is unusual in terms of using terrorism to influence the rise of unity rather than trying to overthrow a standing state. For the purpose of instigating a pan-Islamic revolutionary movement, Al-Qaida tries to unite all Islamic people under one state to develop umma, or Muslim community. The logic of Al-Qaida remained that if their “revolutionaries” could illicit a reaction from the powerful US state, resulting in oppression of the middle-eastern region, that Al-Qaida could, as a result, unite all Muslims to counter this suggested oppression. Although the end goal of Al-Qaida clear failed, it does suggest the organization’s attempt at implementing categorical terrorism.
As Garbarino recognizes, the effects of war and such violence is something that sticks with a child and remains constant in their everyday lives. The experiences that children face involving war in their communities and countries are traumatic and long lasting. It not only alters their childhood perspectives, but it also changes their reactions to violence over time. Sadly, children are beginning to play more of a major role in wars in both the...
The siege at School No. 1 in Beslan showed how the innocence of children can be changed in an instant, more especially when children endure situations of extreme violence. The author concludes that children’s innocence and resilience diminishes somewhat after experiencing tragic and violent events. The surviving Beslan children speak of never returning to normal lives after the siege. The children returned to school, albeit at another school building, but they now approach life in a more cautious and fearful manner. Some feel they now have to protect themselves and their families and of how they have become more mature as a result. Interesting enough, adults seem to be far more cautious than children. Some parents of the Beslan children to this day still accompany their children to school and sit in the classrooms all day with them.
The concept of Jihad was not widely known in the western world before the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Since then, the word has been woven into what our media and government feed us along with notions of Terrorism, Suicide Bombings, Hamas, Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, and now, Jihad. Our society hears exhortations resounding from the Middle East calling the people to rise up in Jihad and beat back the imperialist Americans. Yet, if we try to peel back all of these complex layers of information we can we attempt to find out what Jihad really means. Webster’s Dictionary defines Jihad as “a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty or a crusade for a principle or belief” (1). Often, media depicts Jihad in the same manner—as a vicious clash between two very different peoples, each of whom believes that righteousness, and in many cases God, is on their side. From this interpretation and our daily media intake, one may reasonably assume that Jihad refers to nothing more than violent acts, or “holy wars.”
“This is how wars are fought now: by children, traumatized, hopped-up on drugs, and wielding AK-47s” (Beah). Innocent, vulnerable, and intimidated. These words describe the more than 300,000 children in nations throughout the world coerced into combat. As young as age seven, boys and girls deemed child soldiers participate in armed conflict, risking their lives and killing more innocent others. While many individuals recollect their childhood playing games and running freely, these children will remember “playing” with guns and running for their lives. Many children today spend time playing video games like Modern Warfare, but for some children, it is not a game, it is reality. Although slavery was abolished nearly 150 years ago, the act of forcing a child into a military position is considered slavery and is a continuously growing trend even today despite legal documents prohibiting the use of children under the age of 18 in armed conflict. Being a child soldier does not merely consist of first hand fighting but also work as spies, messengers, and sex slaves which explains why nearly 30 percent of all child soldiers are girls. While the use and exploitation of these young boys and girls often goes unnoticed by most of the world, for those who have and are currently experiencing life as a child soldier, such slavery has had and will continue to have damaging effects on them both psychologically and physically.
ISIS started as a break away group of al-Qaeda, one of the most terrible Islamic groups in the world. The stated goal of ISIS is to start a worldwide Islamic caliphate. The areas it controls are ruled under strict
Children are usually viewed as young people that do not have very much to think about, or have much responsibility. That is not the case for these individuals. In fact, child soldiers/suicide bombers are almost the exact opposite. A child soldier is defined as “anyone under the age of 18 who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity” (Human Rights). They are put through hardship in which they do not deserve. Kids should not have these images in their head this young. They should not have to go through this abuse either. Children are abused and mistreated all around the world, and child soldiers/suicide bombers are one of the worst circumstances.
Child soldier is a worldwide issue, but it became most critical in the Africa. Child soldiers are any children under the age of 18 who are recruited by some rebel groups and used as fighters, cooks, messengers, human shields and suicide bombers, some of them even under the aged 10 when they are forced to serve. Physically vulnerable and easily intimidated, children typically make obedient soldiers. Most of them are abducted or recruited by force, and often compelled to follow orders under threat of death. As society breaks down during conflict, leaving children no access to school, driving them from their homes, or separating them from family members, many children feel that rebel groups become their best chance for survival. Others seek escape from poverty or join military forces to avenge family members who have been killed by the war. Sometimes they even forced to commit atrocities against their own family (britjob p 4 ). The horrible and tragic fate of many unfortunate children is set on path of war murders and suffering, more nations should help to prevent these tragedies and to help stop the suffering of these poor, unfortunate an innocent children.
The term jihadi was not always commonly recognized in the United States. It was not until the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that the word jihad became widely known. Since the terrorist attacks, the media and the U.S. government have used the word jihad to invoke frightening images of non-Americans coming to destroy American freedoms and to define Islam. Today, scholars have begun to try to define this complex word and its multitude of meanings. When viewers tune into the news, it is sometimes difficult to unravel the layers of information that is being fed to them by the media and the U.S. government. In its most literal form, the term “jihad is an Arabic term meaning, as a noun, ‘struggle’ or, as a verb, ‘to exert effort’ toward a goal” (International Ency 1). However, in Mary Pat Fisher’s book Living Religions the chapter on Islam discusses how the definition of the term jihad is “commonly mistranslated as ‘holy war’ (Fisher 148). While the media frequently portrays jihad consistent with the idea of “struggle,” the media almost always flips the definition on its head by suggesting that this struggle is a malicious struggle between two groups of peoples, each of whom believes that righteousness, and in many cases God, is on their side and evil is on the other side. Suggesting that jihad and violence are in connection with each other has been the case since pre-modern times. In fact, Fisher suggests that the primary associations of the word jihad are religious, specifically with reference the Prophet Mohammad and to the religion of Islam, but also invoke a sense of violence or resistance against an opposing force. While violence and jihad have typically been spoken about together, as of late, the...
Throughout the world children younger than 18 are being enlisted into the armed forces to fight while suffering through multiple abuses from their commanders. Children living in areas and countries that are at war are seemingly always the ones being recruited into the armed forces. These children are said to be fighting in about 75 percent of the world’s conflicts with most being 14 years or younger (Singer 2). In 30 countries around the world, the number of boys and girls under the age of 18 fighting as soldiers in government and opposition armed forces is said to be around 300,000 (“Child Soldiers: An Overview” 1). These statistics are clearly devastating and can be difficult to comprehend, since the number of child soldiers around the world should be zero. Furthermore, hundreds of thousands adolescent children are being or have been recruited into paramilitaries, militias and non-state groups in more than 85 countries (“Child Soldiers: An Overview” 1). This information is also quite overwhelming. Child soldiers are used around the world, but in some areas, the numbers are more concentrated.
Furthermore, these extremists receive little attention in western media because they focus on those in the Middle east. Nakia prevents T’Challa from attacking one of the soldiers revealing that he is still a child. The child soldier represents the thousands of children being forced to commit acts of violence who slowly become desensitized to the horrible things they
Exposure to war at a young age colors the child’s mind with a particular shade. Making them have maladaptive thoughts about how the world is and what it ought to be like. the children may end up knowing that violence is the key to getting what one wants, or that solutions are to their problems are solved through violence. However like Einstein said, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
This analysis seeks to touch on some basic aspects of the U.S. Invasion of Iraq in 2003 that contributed to the creation of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and how our lack of knowledge of the actual political landscape led the U.S. military to implement procedures that divided the country and created a political vacuum that encouraged the growth of Zarqawism and radical jihadi notions among the disenfranchised Iraqis. The purpose of this analysis is to shed light on the internal struggles that were gripping the country before 9/11 and the Invasion, and to view the current rise of radical Islam from a concise perspective that follows a certain chain of events and is based on a theory that factors in much more aspects and sides of the situation compared to many oversimplifications that are believed and used today.
Political violence is the leading cause of wars today. Personal agendas have led to many of the political objectives that cause violence today this has caused many problems throughout the world and will continue to do so until a solution to this issue is found. Political objectives have been advanced involuntarily dependent upon the kind of government a nation exercises. For instance, in a democratic nation political groups must worry about convincing the majority in order to advance ethically. Those who try to influence the majority through acts of violence are considered today as “terror” organizations. Though perhaps if it were not because of the recent 9/11 terror attacks that maybe such warrants would not be seen as terror attacks, but instead the result of partisan advancement. Acts of terrorism have been around throughout the evolution of mankind. Terror attacks have even been traced back as far as the religious roots of an ancient middle east (Ross, Will Terrorism End?, 2006). However as man evolved, so did terrorism. Today’s extremism involves some of the main characteristics of ancient terrorism, but much more developed. Political advancement is no longer the root cause of terrorism acts. Instead influxes of “holy” wars have been appended the prior definition of terrorism. Mistakably modern terrorism has been confused for Political violence with political objectives, but research will establish that the nature of terrorism is fundamentally different from other forms of political violence.