Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on resolving conflicts
An essay on resolving conflicts
An essay on resolving conflicts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on resolving conflicts
Goals are defined as, “what does each person want” (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p.72) Goals can also so be viewed as, and end or desired result. In regards to goals, we often try to reach and accomplish goals in our relationships. However, we often don’t achieve these goals due to existing conflicts, poor communication, or conflict styles.
An ongoing conflict between two parties can be very difficult to handle, especially, when you are dealing with someone who chooses not to acknowledge the conflict. There is an ongoing power struggle based within this conflict, when the other party is taking part in avoidance. Because of that, reaching or achieving your ultimate goal of conflict resolution becomes quite difficult. There are four types of goals
Power in conflict may be “designated (power given by your position), distributive (either/or power), and integrative (both/power).” (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p.103) My current boss is considered as designated power or when I was a retail store manager. Wilmot and Hocker explain, “Distributive power is over or against the other party.”(Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p. 102) Ultimately, I have the power to forgive my mother without her needing to apologize and simply moving on. Integrative power focuses on “(both/and) both parties have to achieve something in the relationship” (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p. 102). Both my mom and, I must achieve forgiveness towards the other. Power can be at the core of conflict in a relationship. When there is an expressed struggle, within the relationship power is often times at its
I learned from completing the “Assessing my Conflict Style” journal assignment that; my overall conflict style is compromise and my mother’s is avoidance. In the conflict, with my mother and myself, I noticed that I’m always the one that’s saying, ok mom I see that you don’t want to talk about our issues. Then, I suggest we communicate our issues at a different time and place, we both agree and it ends there. Needless to say, that is definitely a disadvantage of my compromising conflict style. I end up not getting what I want, which is to have the conversation while, my mother is satisfied because we don’t have the dreaded conversation. This is always the case, with my mother’s avoidance conflict style we never get anywhere. Nonetheless. I’m hopeful because, now she knows that I have been hurting for an extended period of time. I believe it would be beneficial for our conflict if I began to work more on using additional conflict styles. If I, will allow myself to be more accommodating and recognizing that resolving this conflict is not easy for my mother either. I must learn that at times my needs may be secondary, in that moment to possibly make any progress. My mother may be avoiding the issues because she doesn’t quite know how to deal with them. I also recognize that collaborating with my mother and working to find an agreeable solution to
...beliefs, is “negotiable” under pressures from different relationships (Lerner, p.20). I would like to think that I do not do this. However, recently I caught myself doing this very thing during an argument with my mother. My mom has always been the controlling type of mother. She always has to be right. In this particular argument, I knew that I was right but I stopped pushing the subject because I wanted to end the argument. I also felt like I was not going to win, so I stopped making my case. I lacked assertiveness when it came to my mother and that is something that I need to work on. The chapter about anger dealing with impossible mothers has helped me see that I need to break this pattern. I really liked that the book did not give certain steps to dealing with anger. Everyone deals with anger in different ways and some situations might take longer than others.
According to dictionary.com a goal is “the result or achievement toward which effort is directed.” A goal is a checkpoint that you strive to accomplish throughout life. Reading Dillards quote makes me think of never giving up on your goals and aspirations because if you have realistic goals and work hard towards them they can be achieved. In “Living Like Weasels” Annie Dillard says humans need to live more like weasels, “noticing everything, remembering nothing” (879). This portrays the weasel as living
Did you know that in 2014, shoplifting and worker’s theft cost the retail industry a loss of thirty-two billion dollars (Wahba, 2015)? According Wahba “a common misperception about shoplifting is that retailers can ‘afford’ the loss of a candy bar or a pair of jeans” (2015). This type of reasoning certainly does make more sense when explained through the context of a criminological theory. For example according to the Rational Choice theory individuals weigh the costs and benefits associated with a criminal and or deviant act and then make a conscious choice. Other criminological theories explain criminal and deviant behavior using a biological, psychological, social, conflict, or multifactor component. Taking that into consideration in this
“We all fight on two fronts, the one facing the enemy, the other facing what we do to the enemy” (Boyden 199).
From past, present, to future, conflict has defined history. In a world full of battles, revolutions, and seemingly random acts of evil, it is impossible to escape the reality of it all. Many of today’s great classics have been inspired by generations of conflict. Using World War II as the background for John Knowles’ novel A Separate Peace brings up the question if it is ever possible to live in a world without fear, hate and ultimately inevitable conflict. Knowles uses contrasting characters, the innate nature of humans, and contradictory symbols in order to reflect that conflict is inevitable.
In the study of theories of criminology that emphasizes the role of social conflict as it underlies criminality and of social change is critical for the understanding of the interplay between social order and law. The conflict perspective, the pluralist perspective, and the consensus perspective are three analytical perspectives that shed light on this subject. Another type of social conflict theory is radical criminology that comes with its own tenants and shortcomings. Peacemaking criminology, left-realist criminology, convict criminology, postmodern criminology, and feminist criminology, are emerging social conflict theories that where associated with the radical ideas of mid-twentieth Marxist criminology.
Almost every conflict situation consists of one party having more power than the other. When the power differential is significant, this usually has a major effect on both the matter and process of the dispute. In order for the outcome of the conflict to be fair, both parties must be relatively equal when it comes to power if resolution of the conflict is to be fair. If one side is far more powerful than another, they are more likely to impose their solution on the weaker party, who in turn will be forced to acquiesce, because they have no other choice.
Conflict theory is a perspective derived from the work of Karl Marx, who believe that society is a dynamic entity and it is constantly undergoing changes driven by class conflict, who holds different interests, ideas and values, for competing scare resources and aiming to maximize their own-benefits. According to the founder of conflict theory, Karl Marx, society are divided into two category: the have and the do not have, the latter is dominated by the former ones who are those people with power in hands and with the greatest political, economic and social resources. Conflict theory assumes that society makes the norms to serve the interests of the powerful.
Realistic Conflict Theory As one of the oldest social psychology theories, the Realistic Conflict Theory deals with the conflict and hostility that is projected to arise between individuals or groups competing over the same limited resources. Therefore, as a resource, opportunity, or even goal, becomes harder to obtain, the amount of aggression is projected to increase as well. This theory is not only visible in many everyday situations, but it also establishes a basis for which discrimination and prejudice can be partly explained. The initial study of this theory was conducted in a three-step experiment.
Conflict always rises from differences because it is a disagreement of people and their values, motivations, perceptions, ideas and desires. Not necessarily these differences seem unimportant however a conflict causes strong feelings, a relational need of core problem, feelings of respect and value and closeness and intimacy. Conflict can be resolved through mediation, negotiation and arbitration process however mediation is the best means to resolve conflict in every sector. Different figures have different definition about mediation but there is still no universally agreed definition of general theory of mediation however Moore’s (2003) mediation definition is appeared more scientific and universal. According to Moore (2003), mediation is
My mother tends to think with her emotions too much as appose to myself. I learned our communication and understanding of each others view points needs to improve for the future if we ever find ourselves in similar situations. It also prepared me for when my mother and I have to deal with relatives passing away. I can for certain say that when that day comes, I will be the stronger one. As chaotic as this situation is, one thing I could say we are doing correctly is managing our dog equally. Despite our issues with communicating, my mother and I did come to some kind of understanding and agreement. My mother feels like she deals with our dogs issues far too much and I agreed with her. We both came to an agreement that I will take some of those responsibilities and leave her with less stress and perhaps her viewpoints on what is best for Russell may change. A major component that could and still be tremendously improved on is the way we communicate. My mother is a very impulsive person who acts on her emotions all the time. I 'm far more less emotional and incredibly level headed and logical when It comes to tough situations and because of our contrasting ways of dealing with issues, we don 't always see eye to eye. We misunderstand each other and can be quite stubborn at times. My mother tends to think I don 't care because of my attitude and I think my mother could
My fundamental beliefs are that adults and children should have respect for one another treating people as individuals. I believe that we should model a sense of understanding, encouragement, trust, teamwork, and perseverance in all who we come in contact with. I believe that everyone has should have the opportunity to learn in a environment that is positive and encouraging. Recognizing my fundamental beliefs I know that in the Skinner-Rogers’ dichotomy that I fall on the Rogerian side of the scale. My beliefs are consistent with that of Rogers. I am also in favor of referent power and I would like to work with the students as an interactionalist. With all of these frameworks in mind I looked at a program that most fit my beliefs and frameworks. I believe that I can initiate the program of Glasser and use it effectively in my teaching situation. Many schools and programs regularly go through a process whereby they attempt to develop a new philosophical base and a different practical approach to working with students. Jones (1987) estimated that 80% of disruptive behavior is talking to each other, 15% out of seat, the remaining 5% is spent on note passing, playing with pencils or objects. The cost of student failure is absorbed. If we are losing 30 to 50% of our time keeping on task as a result of small disruptions, I would say to you that no other problem costs you 30 to 50% of your entire school budget. In keeping this in mind, I would propose that our middle school take a look at a program developed by Dr. William Glasser, M.D. His model is consistent with my own beliefs and would fulfill the vision that our school has developed. Integrated in Dr. Glasser’s model are Choice Theory (previously termed Control Theory), Reality Therapy, and the Quality School. Choice Therapy is an explanation of behavior, Reality Therapy is a process allowing Choice Therapy principles to be operationalized, and the Quality Schools represent the application of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy ideas in Education. William Glasser’s model involves the initiation of what he calls quality schools. Glasser (1992) contends that we must offer students an education that they can see will satisfy both their immediate and future needs. Students can only learn if they view their schools as a place that is at least potentially need satisfying. If students do not perceive what we are offer...
In a person, a goal can be directly linked to their ambition or determination to achieve some end. A goal is a desired outcome. A machine can seem determined because it will persevere with a task until it is finished but this is an illusion and a machine can’t desire anything. Another aspect of a goal is that it must be a tangible outcome; you must be able to describe the desired finishing state or else how would you know if you had achieved it?
Disputes or conflicts can arise in any workplace, family home, or institution and they exist when one or more parties disagree with each other’s views and require the help, support, or service of a third party person to find a resolution. A fair and balanced conflict resolution process is important for the most effective outcome between two or more parties. Advocacy and mediation are two of many conflict resolutions that can be used in order to solve a problematic situation. However, certain situations require the skills, processes, and procedures that are exhibited by one more than the other. In some scenarios there may be a need to use both conflict resolutions if one does not proceed accordingly. Understanding the circumstance of the situation is ideal in discovering which conflict resolution would allow parties to come to a mutual agreement or resolution.
According to Robin (2002), there are five conflict resolution styles: confront compromise, collaborate, accommodate, and avoid. Identify the preference(s) you most often use from these resolution styles. Think about times you have interacted with styles other than your own. Once the differences between these styles are identified, they can be managed, and the appropriateness of when to use them can be determined.