My fundamental beliefs are that adults and children should have respect for one another treating people as individuals. I believe that we should model a sense of understanding, encouragement, trust, teamwork, and perseverance in all who we come in contact with. I believe that everyone has should have the opportunity to learn in a environment that is positive and encouraging. Recognizing my fundamental beliefs I know that in the Skinner-Rogers’ dichotomy that I fall on the Rogerian side of the scale. My beliefs are consistent with that of Rogers. I am also in favor of referent power and I would like to work with the students as an interactionalist. With all of these frameworks in mind I looked at a program that most fit my beliefs and frameworks. I believe that I can initiate the program of Glasser and use it effectively in my teaching situation. Many schools and programs regularly go through a process whereby they attempt to develop a new philosophical base and a different practical approach to working with students. Jones (1987) estimated that 80% of disruptive behavior is talking to each other, 15% out of seat, the remaining 5% is spent on note passing, playing with pencils or objects. The cost of student failure is absorbed. If we are losing 30 to 50% of our time keeping on task as a result of small disruptions, I would say to you that no other problem costs you 30 to 50% of your entire school budget. In keeping this in mind, I would propose that our middle school take a look at a program developed by Dr. William Glasser, M.D. His model is consistent with my own beliefs and would fulfill the vision that our school has developed. Integrated in Dr. Glasser’s model are Choice Theory (previously termed Control Theory), Reality Therapy, and the Quality School. Choice Therapy is an explanation of behavior, Reality Therapy is a process allowing Choice Therapy principles to be operationalized, and the Quality Schools represent the application of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy ideas in Education. William Glasser’s model involves the initiation of what he calls quality schools. Glasser (1992) contends that we must offer students an education that they can see will satisfy both their immediate and future needs. Students can only learn if they view their schools as a place that is at least potentially need satisfying. If students do not perceive what we are offer...
... middle of paper ...
...ourage creative thinking because rote learning offers little power. School supervised work programs, beginning at age ten and continuing until graduation, can also give power, suggests Glasser. Team academic competitions also meet the need for power. Glasser also proposes educators provide students with more freedom, by allowing and encouraging students to pick instructors, classes and testing procedures. This can also be accomplished by having students involved in the rule structure of the classroom and the school. Quality schools eliminate coercion and use lead management (Glasser, 1986). The emphasis is always on the quality of the work done or the quality of the interaction among people. Quantity takes a back seat. Quality work is the best that a student can do at this time. It is their best effort and shows continuous improvement. It is useful, feels good, is never destructive, and offers flexibility (ex. Authentic assessment). This would fit in well with the concept of portfolio assessment that we are currently using in the middle school. Quality schools use social contracts asking if you had what you want in your classroom regarding the way your students interact with you.
It is widely believed, and reported that crime is higher in communities with higher populations of minority residents. While the authors of Criminological Thought (1990), overviewed what they considered the foundational theorists and contributors to the field of criminology, not all of those examined within the text emphasized the same things. It is the writers position that three of those contributors examined within the book, the respective theories of Earl Richard Quinney, Edwin Sutherland, and Robert Ezra Park, specifically Park’s Social Disorganization Theory, Quinney’s Conflict Theory, and Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory are often utilized to describe the plight of instability in urban communities and crime. This paper
Our society is constantly moving. Everyday men and women from around the globe wake up and commence with their daily routines. In the traditional iconic American household of the 1950s, the husband might start his day by preparing for work while his wife starts hers by preparing breakfast for the family and then taking the kids to school. Sociologist have long thought about the causes behind the actions of the male and their female counterpart in society. Two very different popular theories have emerged to explain this phenomenon. The first theory, functionalism, views society as complex system with different part working together to ensure societies survival (Page 13). The second theory, Conflict Theory. This theory argues that the actions
Numerous cases in history show that identification with a particular group can lead to dreadful outcomes. Together, with historical evidence, classic psychological studies tell a very powerful story. Decent people can take on oppressive roles and succumb to oppressive leaders. However, people often resist tyranny, and their resistance tends to be most effective when it is collective.
The American system of education is considered to be one of the most progressive in the world. One of the surveys on attitudes toward teaching around the world found that the United States is unique in its strong emphasis on "good teaching." My experience at State College has helped me to understand better how this system works, and what methods and techniques American teachers use to motivate their students for creative and active learning. However, I can also see that this system doesn’t work perfectly in every classroom. Reading Ernest Boyer’s article “Creativity in the Classroom” helped me with my understanding of the main problem that nowadays exists with the American college education system. According to the author, the problem is that teachers and students don’t see each other as one team doing the same business; therefore, in most classrooms the process of learning becomes a boring procedure instead of being mind-blowing. Moreover, reading this article, I could analyze the reasons of this problem that the author identifies through my own experiences at State College.
Social conflict theory can be used to understand global poverty and contemporary (modern) factors continue to influence inequalities between high income and low income countries. Karl Marx, Max Weber, Wallerstein and institution such as The Frankfurt School. Assist in helping understand how inequality and global poverty continues to grow. Theories such as capitalist system, the world system, bureaucracy, critical theory, labor movement, people and commodities rein enforce global poverty. There are many decisions that influenced unfair treatment towards people for different backgrounds.
The conflict theoretical perspective, created by Karl Marx, is when a person in a position of power, ruling class, controls a person, such as the Bourgeoisie, to extract value from the working class of society, such as Proletariat. Alienation is the reason why this perspective is to become possible. An example of Alienation is when a proletariat is suffering in life and does not have possession of materialistic or non-materialistic items. The desire for Alienation changes the cultural, educational, and emotional sociality. This focuses as an advantage of producing talent and increasing profits for the ruling class.
What is crime? Does the way that people are socialized affect their participation in or disassociation with crime? There are many questions similar to the ones asked above that have been asked for a very long time. When these questions are organized into systematic scientific inquiries, they are known as scientific theories, and the people who attempt to answer them are known as theorists.
Social conflict theory is a perspective that predicts that when social constraints on antisocial behavior are weakened. In other words social conflict theory is when a group of individuals have most of the power and will try to exploit the law to there fullest before they follow them, leaving the smaller group to obey the law as much as they can. At the same time social conflict theory asks why people follow rules instead of breaking them. Some different perspectives in social conflict theory are the consensus perspective, the pluralist perspective, and the conflict perspective. There are also other theories that support the social conflict theory such as radical criminology, peacemaking criminology, and the left realist criminology, that all prove conflict will happen in order for change to happen.
Sociologists have many different lenses they can view society's problems from. Early sociologists view problems from the macro level. The two broader views are functionalism and the conflict perspective. Functionalist sociologists believe that society has institutions, rules guide society, and society functions with organization. The conflict perspective looks at social events and how class structure and levels of wealth impact the event and this theory believes social change is possible through revolution. A later theory was developed to look at events at a micro level and that theory is symbolic interactionism. According to symbolic interactionism, and the basis of this theory is that society places value on certain symbols and objects.
"First come love, then comes marriage, then as many concurrent marriages as you want." This remixed nursery rhyme stated by Samantha Allen from an article in 'The Daily Beast' startled me as I read it. To hear that and learn during this research that there are an abundance of people that live day to day happily committing this crime are just one of many reasons as to why that statement was disturbing. This lifestyle is known as polygamy which is the state of marriage when one guy have multiple wives. I find this very unexceptable and I am going to use conflict theory to explain my justifications as to why it is so.
Throughout life we all experience different types of conflicts, and typically what comes to mind when thinking of conflict is “arguments” and “negativity”. However, conflict can also be a good thing and there are a variety of styles. Conflict styles can range from being someone who cooperates, directs, compromises, avoids, or harmonizes. It can be a great resource to develop an understanding of each conflict style because we can learn to bring a balance with each individual. My good friend, who for the purpose of this assignment will be called “Rose”, and I, took a “conflict styles inventory test” in order to determine which styles of conflict we lean towards the most, and found it very surprising that my friend came out “calm” on all conflict
Jia, G., Yang, F., Wang, G., Hong, B., & You, R. (2011). A study of mega project from a perspective of social conflict theory. International Journal of Project Management,29(7), 817-827. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.04.004
Most decision have more than one potential choice or path, be it a good choice or a poor one. Conflict occurs when there are opposing forces choosing different choices to the same decision tree. Conflict can be, internal to oneself, between individuals, or between groups. This essay will formally define conflict, including stages of conflict and conflict management strategies, through the analysis of a situation where someone’s poor decision with social media may have cost them employment opportunities.
The conflict perspective is very apparent in modern day issues affecting the environment. Environmental groups, both government and non-government based like The Sierra Club and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) are often at odds with industries with conflicting goals such as logging and oil industries. The industries want their right to manufacture products from natural resources, while environmental groups want to protect and preserve these limited natural resources. For example, conservationist groups lobby to industries in the energy field and people in general to reduce and conserve their use of natural resources and to develop alternate sources for this energy. On the other hand, preservationists strive to preserve these resources as much as possible. Various other environmental groups have specific purposes and goals such as eliminating air pollution from automobiles and stopping the dumping of chemicals into ocean waters. The general goal of all of these groups is to preserve and ensure the existence of all living beings on earth. While this may sound simple or easy, it is far from it. When big businesses like oil companies have billions of dollars and tremendous influences on government, small time environmental groups only get secondary attention.
As a concept, Conflict management has been conventionally associated with conflict containment. According to Hugh Miall, conflict management theorists “see violent conflicts as an ineradicable consequence of differences of values and interests within and between communities.” These theorists regard “Resolving such conflicts as unrealistic: the best that can be done is to manage and contain them, and occasionally to reach a historic compromise in which violence may be laid aside and normal politics resumed.” This definition assumes that conflicts are irresolvable and that handling is limited to containing them and ending the violence.