Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lewis Coser and conflict theory
Consequences of group conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lewis Coser and conflict theory
The function of the conflict, according to Lewis Coser, is reinforcing group solidarity, including serving as a safety-valve, channeling tensions in constructive ways rather than letting them build up to such a point that when conflict is unleashed, it is unleashed with destructive force (211). In other words, Coser, argued that the function of conflict serves as a solution to unite a group or help reestablish unity where it has been threatened by an unfriendly feeling among the members of the group. However, this might not always be the case, due to the fact that it depends on the type of social structure that the group consists of. In sum, conflicts serve several functions in which include social change, innovation, and an increase of power …show more content…
However, if the social group fails to understand one another on the goals, values, or interests, it is not surprisingly true that it will be damaged and not functional. A real life example, of an internal conflict, in my sense, would be that of an intimate soccer team that has multiple years playing together. Everybody in the team has knowledge of each other extremely well, including the coach that instructs the team. In addition, let’s suppose that a particular teammate starts becoming envious of the team captain, due to the fact that he feels that he would be much better off leading the soccer team than his current teammate. Next, the jealous team player goes up to the captain, and starts insulting him and accusing him of the team’s losses. The former captain, including other teammates, calmly talk civilized to this hostile teammate, although the insults have been going on for quite a while. The team captain has finally had enough and leaves the team. Now, the social structure has been torn apart. In this circumstance, the intimate soccer team had gone years playing as a whole, but as one teammate was challenging for a scarce resource, it had consequences on the very root of the relationship. My real life example was caused by the fact that a team player …show more content…
For instance, the Black Lives Matter movement, which debuted after the exploitation of police brutality, this, could ultimately be considered an external conflict due to its characteristics. The movement that came about, which mainly consisted of a major minority group that was demanding absolute justice for people of color. The videos that were going viral had an incredible impact on the African-American community which led them to become a united group that became quite strong. Hence, the external social conflict that creates boundaries between different groups. The African-American community became united as one to overthrow an opposed group, which would be group of law enforcement. As a result, the individual group in this instance, the African-American community, produced a strong unity within themselves. It promotes cohesion and coalitions with outside groups as well as within the group. Hence, the production of an external conflict will produce integration. Moreover, individuals that try to solve conflicts will ultimately produce integration, which a main function that external conflict produces. On this note, this particular conflict did in fact utilize the benefits of external conflicts. This real life example utilized the benefits by providing the individuals of a group with a sense of unity to one another in order to overcome the
...This conflict is definitely external because it is a group of people versus another group of people. The conflict is resolved after the war ended.
Turman, P. (October 25, 2000f). Group Cohesiveness and Conflict: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
The book displays two social concepts, conflict theory and structural-functionalism. Conflict theory is defined as “a theory propounded by Karl Marx that claims society is in a state of perpetual conflict due to competition
Society is based on two groups the people the haves and the have-nots. In the movie Glory Road, the Caucasians are the haves and the African-Americans are the have-nots. The beliefs of a conflict theorist are that there is competition for scarce resources, some form of inequality to maintain, and social change comes about because of the conflicts (Brinkerhoff 10-11).
...ities to come together, and causes people to re-evaluate their relationships with one another, all toward ensuring that, on the whole, peace continues into the future.
By definition, conflict theory basically sees the society as a pitch in which inequality thrives in order to generate conflict and change. For instance, this theory emphasizes on the purpose of coercion in generating a social order that’s often ch...
“We all fight on two fronts, the one facing the enemy, the other facing what we do to the enemy” (Boyden 199).
Pruitt, Dean G, and Sung Hee Kim. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 3rd ed. 2004. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2004.
Our society is constantly moving. Everyday men and women from around the globe wake up and commence with their daily routines. In the traditional iconic American household of the 1950s, the husband might start his day by preparing for work while his wife starts hers by preparing breakfast for the family and then taking the kids to school. Sociologist have long thought about the causes behind the actions of the male and their female counterpart in society. Two very different popular theories have emerged to explain this phenomenon. The first theory, functionalism, views society as complex system with different part working together to ensure societies survival (Page 13). The second theory, Conflict Theory. This theory argues that the actions
Conflict theory are perspective in sociology psychology that accentuate the social, political, or material inequality of a social group, that analysis the broad socio-political system, or that weaken from structural functionalism and ideological conservatism. With conflict theory, you will see tensions, status, and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society, which these conflicts become the purpose of social change. Conflict theory usually arise due to competition and limited resource that is feed by domination and power, rather than consensus and conformity. This is seen a lot on macro level. As a social worker, you will see and use conflict theory throughout your professional.
Many people enjoy working or participating in a group or team, but when a group of people work together chances are that conflicts will occur. Hazleton describes conflict as the discrepancy between what is the perceived reality and what is seen as ideal (2007). “We enter into conflicts reluctantly, cautiously, angrily, nervously, confidently- and emerge from them battered, exhausted, sad, satisfied, triumphant. And still many of us underestimate or overlook the merits of conflict- the opportunity conflict offers every time it occurs” (Schilling, nd.). Conflict does not have to lead to a hostile environment or to broken relationships. Conflict if resolved effectively can lead to a positive experience for everyone involved. First, there must be an understanding of the reasons why conflicts occur. The conflict must be approached with an open mind. Using specific strategies can lead to a successful resolution for all parties involved. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument states “there are five general approaches to dealing with conflict. The five approaches are avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration. Conflict resolution is situational and no one approach provides the best or right approach for all circumstances” (Thomas, 2000).
The social conflict model has two types of conflict, the social consensus and the social conflict. Dalton took the concept of informal organization from just workers to include managers and is called managerial conflict. This is a power struggle of humans using conflict to control their environment and social activities within the organization in their favor. Dalton believes it is human to use conflict to your advantage. They’re several layers of conflicts that arise between coworkers, between departments, supervisor and worker, between staff members, between different groups within the larger organization and just good old personality conflicts. Rules are made to control conflicts and behavior, but who do they benefit. They are called organizational rules but individuals implement them and either favors the individual or his group within the group. Bendix did a study on 1956 about managerial ideologies. The managers or leaders use influence within the organization to get workers to follow them and work together for the company. They use this conflict of ideas to obtain loyalty, and employees who are loyal to their company. Sometimes conflict comes from outside the organization. An example of this theory outside influence is the National Football league and spousal and child abuse. A rash of abuse cases arising from the actions of the athletes, caused outside influences to take action against the National Football League. Women and other outside groups influenced the league to implement new rules to control or change the behavior of their employees, the
“To live anyhow is better than not at all” (Chekhov 1) , the short story, The Bet commenced with the conflict when the person had no choice but to choose between the death penalty or life in prison. The Bet was originally written by Anton Chekhov, a profound Russian short-story writer who concentrated a lot on human values and the reflection of the extravagantly selfish Russian nobility. And through The Bet he was able to express all those ideas in two sides, the banker and the lawyer with the conflict along the story line.
Similar to Coser and Simmel, Deutsch agrees the potential of conflict to be functional, or constructive. The positive sides of conflict, according to Deutsch, include always revitalize norms, inspire interest and curiosity of individuals or organizations, and the development of solutions etc. (Deutsch, 1973: p.9) On the other hand, his theory disagrees with Coser’s. Deutsch supported that conflict could also lead to dysfunctional or destructive consequences. For example, the U.S military involvement in Vietnam. According to Deutsch, the cost of continuing that conflict could become so massive, that would lead to a destructive result, such as the breakdown of the economy, deaths of the solder and citizens, and destruction of architecture. Unlike Deutsch, Edward Rozycki and Gary Clabaugh in their book: The Functions of Conflict in the Context of Schooling, 1999, have fully adapted Lewis Coser’s theory. They suggested that “conflict and cooperation are not separable things.” (Rozycki and Clabaugh, 1999: p.39) In the context of schooling, they provided some example where conflict or antagonism can be functional for the whole system. The school board would appoint school administrators and teacher with antagonisms, because such antagonism can prevent administrators and teachers from forming a community against the school board. Rozycki and Clabaugh argued five main functions of conflict and four of those are similar to Coser’s minimizing isolation, definition of “us” versus “them”, revitalize existing norms and replication of similar behavior within the group. The one that stands one is reconnaissance. It’s defined as the information gathering. Using the example that Rozycki and Clabaugh have provided to us, students will “test” their new teacher to see how strict the teachers is about school rules and then
We each possess unique ideas, opinions, beliefs, and feelings about specific situations in life. This uniqueness is a large part of what makes us human. Because we all have our own individual way of looking at things, we each have a different viewpoint on what is proper or improper. With all that variation in society conflict is inevitable! Conflict is antagonistic in nature and we all must find ways to work through conflict issues both at work and at home. This paper describes different types of conflict, the influences I personally had in learning to deal with those conflicts, some of the conflicts that I commonly experience, how I go about dealing with those conflicts, and how conflict affects me on a personal level.