Conceptions of the Social Contract Theory

936 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Thomas Hobbes Social contract theory

Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau were political philosophers who formulated their own version of the social contract theory. The social contract theory is a treaty or an agreement that developed a set of laws, organized a functional society, and created the need to be governed. It was put into place when man realized that there was no law. Mankind eventually sought the desire for security and order. To receive security and order people shall voluntarily give up all their rights and freedoms and be obedient to some sort of authority. The social contract theory is made up of two agreements known as, “Pactum Unionis” and “Pactum Subjectionis”. The “Pactum Unionis” agreement would help the people with their troubles and hardships by teaching them to value and protect their livelihoods and property because these things are now being saw as vital to survival for all of mankind. In addition, order would allow people to live alongside one another in peace and harmony. This would drastically increase the value man can get out of life creating respect. On the other hand, “Pactum Subjectionis” agreement would help the people with their troubles and hardships by uniting them together and getting them to pledge that they would obey and surrender to authority. The authority will assure everyone protection over their life, property, and liberty; although, liberty would only be protected to a certain extent. These two agreements are the reason why we have a government in present day. Thomas Hobbes’ version of the social contract is also known as his legal theory or the Hobbesian theory. He published a book titled “Leviathan” which outlined his conception of the social contract. Hobbes believed in absolute sovereignty,... ... middle of paper ... ... and confusing as well because he had two concepts. Though, after reading and researching I was able to understand and agree with his concepts. In the first concept, he mentions that mankind lived happy lives during the state of nature and he explains the transition from the state of nature to present day life. He says that the reason for transition would be that population increased causing people to have to interact with each other which would ultimately end with conflict. Works Cited Cahn, Steven M. 2011/April 24,2014 Political philosophy: the essential texts. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Dunning, Wm. A. Septemper 1909/April 22, 2014. The Political Theories of Jean Jacques Rousseau. The Academy of Political Science Lessnoff, Michael H. 1986/April 20, 2014. Social contract. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press Internationa.

Show More
Related

  • Peta Ethos Pathos Logos

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    promoting collaboration among nations”, this image primarily to the act of giving rights for all

    Read More

  • Comparing The Social Contract And The Leviathan

    1688 Words  | 4 Pages

    Similar to Hobbes, a contract is made between people. The social contract requires them to totally alienate all of their rights to the entire community. This is a significant difference from Hobbes theory because in this case the people are laying down their rights to one another and not to a sole figure. Because the social contract is set up in this way, there is no room from reservations; no one would try and make the contract harder for anyone because to do that would in turn make it harder for themselves. The lack of partiality creates a near perfect union. (Rousseau, 164) Another major difference between this theory and the one formerly mentioned is that this agreement is advantageous for the soon to be subjects. This advantage goes beyond safety from the state of nature; by agreeing to surrender all of their rights to each person without there being one man who retains it, they gain “the equivalent of everything he loses” however this time there is more force to preserve them. Now, one may wonder how this can work if everybody gains back the rights they surrendered to make the contract. We can understand this as people who come together, promising to not use these rights against each other, an instead they combine them to create a sum of forces that can withstand the resistance presented in the state of nature. (Rousseau, 163) After the contract is set up the

    Read More

  • The Practicality of the Social Contract

    2194 Words  | 5 Pages

    Society’s structure has been debated and contested as far back as ancient Greece. Since then, man has developed social systems that greatly differ from anything the ancients had in mind. One such system is the social contract theory, which first came to prominence around the time of the enlightenment. Simplified, social contractarians argued that in order to achieve a balanced and stable society, all of its members must sacrifice certain liberties to a government or similar authority. As Rousseau explains, the contract begins when “Each of us places his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will” (148). Essentially, it is an agreement between the rulers and the ruled that produces a stable political state. John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract are both enlightenment works that detail contractarianism, yet each has a unique and different way of considering the social contract. Although John Stuart Mill is also known for his work with Utilitarianism, his essay On Liberty considers consent and other issues relating to contract theory. These authors provide different insights into the social contract, and frequently one will reject another’s idea and offer a new solution. Even after this meshing of ideas and solutions, contract theory falls short of practicality. The idea is appealing, appearing on the surface as a fair and just way of governance. However, true liberty cannot arise from a contract, as man cannot be “forced to be free” (150). There are two fundamental flaws with contractarianism: it is not practical and it ignores human nature, and even if were possible to establish a true contract-based society, the citi...

    Read More

  • John Rawls: Philosopher On The Social Contract

    102 Words  | 1 Pages

    John Rawls was one the philosopher in the social contract who added the principle dealing with the unfair distribution of wealth and power, in his philosophy Rawls believed that everyone should claim a number of basic rights, and everyone must be provided with the same equal opportunity. Thomas Hobbes was another philosopher on the social contract who believed in the theory of human motivation; his belief was founded on the hypothetical state of nature and human behavior, Human macro-behavior can be aptly described as the effect of certain kinds of micro-behavior, even though some of this latter behavior is invisible to

    Read More

  • John Locke's Influence on the Founding Fathers

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    Strauss, Leo, and Joseph Cropsey. History of Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Hobbes And John Locke

    1432 Words  | 3 Pages

    The social contract theory was a political foundation that underlined the distinct forms of government. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke mention the formation of governments, the main key to form a successful government is through consent such as voting, joining a military, or allow to be ruled by a sovereign. The contrasting ideologies by both theorists differ in human nature, Hobbes believed that man is not a social animal while John Locke opposed to this idea and stated that by nature man was a social animal. The distinction that both portrayed in the role of the government in a man 's life and the perspective on the state of nature were argued in the following texts, Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government. Society consents to a government

    Read More

  • John Locke And Thomas Hobbes Essay

    2840 Words  | 6 Pages

    -Edwards A., Towshend J., Interpreting modern political philosophy- From Macchiavelli to Marx, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Social Contract Analysis

    643 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes is now broadly viewed as one of a smaller group of truly extraordinary political thinkers, whose major work was the Leviathan rivals in meaning the political writings of Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls. Hobbes is most known for his for his early and elaborate development of what has come to be known as “social contract theory”, the method of justifying political principles or arrangements by appeal to the agreement that would be made among suitably situated rational, free, and equal persons. He is most famous for using his theory on the social contract to submit that human beings should submit to an absolute—undivided and unlimited—sovereign power (Lloyd, 2014) Hobbes wanted to ascertain the clear values for the construction of a civil organization that would not be subject to destruction from within. Hobbes maintains the ideology that people should look at their government as having absolute authority, while arguing that the government has absolute power he reserves the idea that we have the liberty of disobeying some of our government's instructions. He argues that subjects retain a

    Read More

  • Problems with the Maastricht Treaty and its Goal to Unify Europe

    626 Words  | 2 Pages

    which infers working towards a goal in harmony. The Maastricht Treaty sounds like an ideal proposal on paper, but in reality it can't work. In order to adopt the treaty several countries will have to make sacrifices. The sacrificial. Nobody likes to make sacrifices.

    Read More

  • Social Contract Theory and Cultural Relativism

    2200 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes’s social contract theory is minimally related to that of cultural relativism. Both deal with human nature and the search for peace. But while cultural relativism is in some ways a noteworthy theory, the social contract theory is the only one of the two that could logically work in an active environment.

    Read More

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Social Contract

    1773 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “The Social Contract”. Modern Political Thought, Second Edition. Ed. David Wootton. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2008. 427-487.

    Read More

  • Difference Between John Locke And Rousseau

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Locke’s social contract theory applies to all types of societies in any time era. Although, Jean-Jacques Rousseau did write during the Renaissance era, his philosophy limits itself to fix the problem of an absolute monarchy and fails to resolve other types of societies. These philosophers have such profound impacts on modern day societies. For example, the United States’ general will is codified in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, meanwhile individual rights are distinguished in the Declaration of

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    2134 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes and Rousseau, both became two of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies spread all over the world influencing the creation of many new governments. These theorists all recognize that people develop a social contract within their society, but have differing views on what exactly the social contract is and how it is established. By way of the differing versions of the social contract Hobbes and Rousseau agreed that certain freedoms had been surrendered for a society’s protection and emphasizing the government’s definite responsibilities to its citizens.

    Read More

  • Rousseau's Concept of Democracy

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, and Donald A. Cress. "On Democracy." Basic Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub., 1987. 179-80. Print.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau are all social contract theorists that believe in how the people should have certain rights with allows them to have individual freedom. They also believe that the people must give consent in order for the government to work and progress. Although Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau have similar aspects in their theories, they differ from each other through the reason why a government should be created.

    Read More

More about Conceptions of the Social Contract Theory

Open Document