Comparison Of Washington's Moral Code And Personal Behavior

413 Words1 Page

Washington’s moral code and personal behavior were a product of the lessons he had learned from the writings of the Enlightenment because he became more of down-to-earth individual. Unlike many of the Founding Fathers, he believed that having a formal education was not a necessary attribute for a man. Wood describes, “Washington’s Enlightenment was a much more down-to-earth affair, concerned with behavior and with living in the everyday-world of people” (121). Unlike Washington’s Enlightenment, many other individuals shaped their lives by following the guidelines of a military book whilst Washington lived by the book of sophistication. He was rather dedicated to morphing himself to become a perfect and proper w such as with the help of popular writings that included “etiquette books, didactic stories, Spectator papers, Hogarth prints, gentlemanly magazines, [and] classical histories” (121). These writings shaped Washington into the civilized and virtuous leader that he always wished to become. …show more content…

As a young individual, one of Washington’s key writings was his “Rules of Civility and Decent Behaviour in Company and Conversation” which withheld an assortment of 110 proverbs that improved his etiquette in the public eye. Many of the Founding Fathers were aware of the means of being an Enlightened man, but no one was as serious as Washington when following those rules. The author describes Washington as being “...obsessed with having things in fashion and fastidious about his appearance to the world” (121). To some onlookers, it may seem like Washington was just a hard-working individual trying to live up to the Enlightenment’s standards, but to me, it seems as if he was just being

Open Document