Comparison Of Hitler And George Orwell's Animal Farm

312 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Adolf hitler personality

Martin Niemoller was trying to show everyone that read his poem what Hitler was creating and doing to the country. He was trying to get people to see the harm in what Hitler was standing for, how people might not have cared when he came for all of the jews and communist and others, but how all of their thoughts would change when Hitler came for them. Niemoller was trying to make people understand that it didn’t matter if you weren’t a jew or a communist or a trade unionist, that Hitler was still killing people and it didn’t matter who they were. That when the time came and Hitler was coming after you that nobody would speak up for you because there wasn’t anybody left because somebody didn’t speak up for them. He tried to show them to stand up for others because maybe one day they will be standing up for you. …show more content…

“ They were all slain on the spot. And so the tale of confessions and executions went on, until there was a pile of corpses lying before Napoleon’s feet and the air was heavy with the smell of blood.”. Both Hitler and Napoleon can be seen as dictators, who destroyed everything in their path to reach their goal. Such as, Hitler destroying Germany and all its different types of people. Then when Napoleon went after Snowball because he wanted full control over the farm, but the way Snowball was “preaching” it would never be possible, so in order to achieve their goal they both destroyed something for Hitler in was Germany, but for Napoleon it was

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Techniques In Elie Wiesel's Speech

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    He conveys a powerful message using pathos: “There was… suffering and loneliness in the concentration camps that defies imagination. Cut off from the world with no refuge anywhere, sons watched helplessly their fathers being beaten to death. Mothers watched their children die of hunger.” Diction like “loneliness”, “defies imagination”, and “helplessly” create a solemn and helpless tone. It evokes vivid imagery, a tragic scene of death and despair. The juxtaposition of children, this idea of youth and innocence, and death evokes pity from the audience. With this in mind, Reagan would feel guilty if he forced the Jewish people to relive their suffering by going to the Bitburg cemetery. Wiesel then appeals to Reagan’s ethos. They both share a common goal – to attain reconciliation, and to do so, they “must work together with them and with all people” to “bring peace and understanding to a tormented world that… is still awaiting

    Read More

  • Wiesel Rhetorical Analysis

    647 Words  | 2 Pages

    Along with rhetorical appeals, Wiesel also uses many rhetorical devices such as parallelism and anaphora. Wiesel depicts parallelism when he says, “to fight fascism, to fight dictatorship, to fight Hitler” (Wiesel lines 103-104). The parallelism and anaphora, in the quote, provide emphasis on the discrimination and abuse that has taken place around the world. Repeating the same initial phrase shows the significance of the words Wiesel is speaking. Wiesel mentions the victims of this extreme tragedy when he states,” for the children in the world, for the homeless for the victims of injustice, the victims of destiny and society.” (Wiesel lines 17-19). This use of anaphora and parallelism emphasize the amount of people the Holocaust has affected and impacted. The parallelism being used adds value to his opinions and balances the list of people Wiesel is making in his speech.

    Read More

  • Inhumanity In Night Analysis

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I shall always remember that smile. From what world did it come from?”([Wiesel],96). This quote refers to the smiles Wiesel saw at the concentration camps, he is wondering how any one could smile in such a troubling time like this. After everything they have been through they could potentionailly find happiness throughtout this. The Nazis dehumanized the Jews showing inhuman actions towards them. Inhuman, Inhumanity is the quality or state of being cruel or barbarous. In Night, Wiesel exhibits that exposure to a cold blooded, hostile world prompts the devastation of confidence and personality.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis

    757 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people stay silent in times of dispute because they fear being judged, but in reality staying quiet and not choosing sides will never solve the situation. Elie Wiesel was a devoted Jew who was forced to suffer the horrors of the Holocaust at the young age of 15. After being shipped in cattle cars to many concentration camps, including Auschwitz, Elie began fighting for justice and equality for all people despite income, race, religion, or political views. In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel stresses his claim that silence and neutrality will always benefit the oppressor through the use of logos, ethos, and pathos.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel Persuasive Speech

    533 Words  | 2 Pages

    Elie Wiesel not only spoke on his behalf but also on behalf of all the victims of the Holocaust. His words do not only pertain to his situation but to the situations of every world crisis that has been failed to be acknowledged. Elie’s words can be related universally and makes you question, where were these people that are supposedly suppose to be the voices for the silent? The world thrives for equality but how can a world grow and unit if the people are silent. Elie makes valid points throughout the novel that can be referred to other situations in the past and are to come in the future.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wiesel endured much horrors in the world and he has worked his entire life to help get rid of hatred and ignorance from the world. “Fifty-four years ago to the day, a young Jewish boy from a small town in the Carpathian Mountains woke up, not far from Goethe's beloved Weimar, in a place of eternal infamy called Buchenwald. He was finally free, but there was no joy in his heart. He thought there never would be again” (Wiesel 310). This quote from Wiesel’s speech is located at the very beginning of his speech because he wants to build credibility with his audience. He is showing that he had first hand experience of being in the Holocaust. It allows the audience to visualize a young Wiesel being part of the Holocaust having dealt with the pain, punishment, and starvation. Wiesel describes himself as a Jewish boy “without joy in his heart” because even though he finally had his freedom, he felt much compassion from the American soldiers. This quote lets the audience know what the speaker went through and how it affected his world view. Elie Wiesel is a good source to hear about indifference towards World War II from because he lived through it. This quote impacts the meaning of the speech because its lets the audience know a little background information on what happened to Wiesel and we know that what he is saying is truthful because he tells us about what he saw, what he was thinking, and

    Read More

  • Arbeit macht “Frei”

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    The phrase “Arbeit macht Frei” is formed in iron above the gates to many concentration camps including the camp of Auschwitz in Poland, where Elie Wiesel was held by the Nazis during the Holocaust. While this statement is often met with cynicism, there was an ironic truth to this phrase to those who shared in Wiesel’s position. The most straightforward example of the ironism of this statement was the hard labor they did within the camps at the direction of the guards that ultimately led to them escaping selection. Alternatively, there are less direct interpretations of this expression such as extreme exertion freeing the mind from feeling pain or thinking about the horrible conditions and working to preserve someone's life only to be free from the role of caretaker. In the end, the truth of the saying “Arbeit macht Frei” rings true throughout Elie Wiesel’s Night and can be interpreted as an underlying theme to his book.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel The Perils Of Indifference

    1733 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1999, he was invited to speak at the Millennium Lectures, in front of the president, first lady, and other important governmental figures,. In his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, he uses rhetorical devices to get emotional responses and to connect with the audience. He wants to create awareness of the dangers of indifference and show how there needs to be change. His speech eloquently calls out the government for their lack of response during the Holocaust, and warns against continued disregard for the struggles of others. He sees indifference as being the ally of the enemy, and without compassion there is no hope for the victims.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Love In Markus Zusak's The Book Thief

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the book he follows the war and what happens in its wake. Not only the expected pain, but surprisingly the healing and the peace that arise from a time riddled with agony. In conclusion, Hitler’s regime destroyed thousands of lives, from the Jews in concentration camps, to soldiers on the battlefield and finally the average german citizen, but one thing he was never able to do was erase their capability to

    Read More

  • First They Came For The Holocaust Poem Analysis

    1140 Words  | 3 Pages

    Niemoller’s speaker shows his/her conformity by not speaking out, and Gershon’s speaker witnessed firsthand the effects of the concentration camps and how those in authority conformed to Hitler’s idea of hate.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel's Night

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is beneficial that Wiesel published this, if he had not, the world might not have known the extent of the Nazi reign. He exposes the cruelty of man, and the misuse of power. Through a lifetime of tragedy, Elie Wiesel struggled internally to resurrect his religious beliefs as well as his hatred for the human race. He shares these emotions with the world through Night. Being confined in a concentration camp was beyond unpleasant.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    552 Words  | 2 Pages

    The saying “history repeats itself” is used quite often, but how many times have you actually seen it happen? The book Animal Farm portrays the idea of history repeating itself. The character Benjamin and the pigs in the story show history repeating itself throughout the book. In addition to these characters within the book, North Korea displays history's repetition outside the book.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    584 Words  | 2 Pages

    Snowball and Napoleon held a great deal of contrast between the way they each ruled over “Animal Farm/Manor Farm.” The only thing he did lack, was the ability of pursuasion to the other animals. Snowball had all the right ideas, all to better the whole farm. Napoleon, on the other hand, had a knack for stealing other animals’ ideas, then telling the rest it was his and getting credit for it. His ideas only seemed to benefit the pigs and not the animals. It was this, that led to the crumbling of the farm. Napoleons obsession with becoming the ruler is what got Snowball nearly killed by the dogs...in a plot made by Napoleon. Which then produced a whole new rebellion not of the animals to the humans, but of the animals to the pigs. So for these reasons, Snowball showed better qualities for leadership than Napoleon because he wasn’t selfish and thought about the future of “Animal Farm.” First, the dominated farm animals viewed Napoleon and Snowball differently at different times throughout the book. The way the animals reacted to each leader brought upon new problems of the farm. The animals respected Snowball, and believed that his teachings were all true and had a good cause. Although Snowball and Napoleon had superior qualities leadership, it was clearly Snowball who had the better qualities for running a farm. Under Snowballs’ rule, the animals were generally content with what was going on and were all for it if it was to better the farm. It was obvious that Napoleon had the better half of getting his own way on the farm. However, the animals had some problems with Napoleon but they didn’t know haw to express their feelings and show him that they didn’t like the way he ran things. It was the animals’ ignorance that helped keep Napoleon in rule for as long as it was. The responses were so different between the animals that it must have been a drastic change between Snowball and Napoleon.

    Read More

  • George Orwell’s Animal Farm

    1395 Words  | 3 Pages

    As soon as Old Major had died Napoleon took his place as the leader of

    Read More

  • Song Of The Nibelungen Poem Analysis

    687 Words  | 2 Pages

    Poet Friedrich Heinrich von der Hagen believed that the Nibelungelied should be told and absorbed in order to inspire courage, pride, and trust in the people themselves and the fatherland as a whole with a hope that one day there will be a return of German glory and worldly grandeur. Around the time of the Wars of Liberation against Napoleon a famous literary scholar named August Wilhelm Schlegal believed that the Nibelungelied should be read and discussed in schools. Schlegal believed that it would “give German youth the feeling of belonging to an autonomous, glorious and indivisible people that has remained racially pure (unvermischt) since its early days” (Schlegel, quoted in Härd 139). Schlegal also believed that understanding the Nibelungelied conveyed the tribal essence and original character of a people, which is lost in the lifeless symbols of written text. Another man by the name of Albert Schott performed a study in 1843 and found that the Nibelungelied was used typically by nationalists to stir up feelings of devotion and loyalty to the German

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Hitler And George Orwell's Animal Farm

Open Document