Comparison Of Hagar And Pilate In Toni Morrison's Song Of Solomon

968 Words2 Pages

ames are one of the first identifiers a person is given, and yet as infants they are given no choice in this identifier that will be with them for the rest of their lives. In Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon the use of the biblical names Hagar and Pilate serve as a means to show the importance of defining the path of one’s life for one's self, as supposed to letting one's name define it for them. Through juxtaposition and parallels, Morrison teaches a universal lesson of the importance of self definition.
One of the first things said about Pilate after she is born is a comment by the midwife, who said on the topic of her name “Christ-killing Pilate. You can’t get much worse than that for a name.”(19). The association of Pilate Dead with Pontius …show more content…

Hagar was the Egyptian slave of Sarai(Sarah), who was given to Sarai’s husband Abram(Abraham) in order for him to have children. Once Hagar had served her purpose she and her son were cast out of the community and left to fend for themselves in the desert with only a little food and water provided by Abram so he would not feel bad about banishing them. Hagar Dead was used in a similar fashion by Milkman, and then promptly thrown out once Milkman grew tired of her. Also, similar to Abram’s gift of food and water before casting them out, Milkman gave Hagar Dead the gift of a thank you note, “Thank you for all you have meant to me” (99) it said, so Milkman wouldn't feel bad about ending their relationship. The rest of biblical Hagar’s narrative mirrors that of Hagar Dead’s as well. Stranded in the desert, the biblical Hagar and her son began to die of hunger and thirst, but when God heard their cries he opened up their eyes to a well they hadn't noticed before and they both were saved. After Milkman left Hagar Dead, she began to starve. Not in a literal sense, but in the sense that she needed love. Hagar Dead’s sustenance is love, which she shows the reader in the beginning of the novel by saying“some of my days were hungry ones”(48) which Pilate clarifies with “...She don't mean food”(49). Without Milkman’s love to sustain her, of course she began to …show more content…

This was done as a means to explore the theme of danger of letting names creating a path for one's life as supposed to creating it for oneself. In the differences in outcomes, one can see how creating one's own path is important. Pilate Dead did everything she possibly could to be different than Pontius Pilate, and in the end she was rewarded. The bag of bones she carried with her all through her life out of guilt ended up being those of her father, and thus Pilate Dead was able to fulfil her goal of letting her father rest. In making her own path, Pilate was able to create her own ending as well. Hagar Dead, on the other hand, followed the path of the biblical Hagar and made no effort to get off of it. In the end this led to her downfall, because whereas biblical Hagar had God to save her, Hagar dead did not. In allowing the path of her life to be determined by her name, Hagar Dead sealed her fate to follow the story of her namesake. The importance of being able to separate oneself from one's name may be of a magnitude that is not normally seen in real life, but the lesson remains. Create a path for oneself and you can make then end a good

Open Document