Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emma jane austen a feminist novel
Feminist reading of Emma by jane austen
Literary analysis of Emma by jane austen
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emma jane austen a feminist novel
Comparing the Text and the Two Filmed Versions of Jane Austen's Emma
After reading Jane Austen's Emma, then viewing the BBC production and Miramax films based on the novel one can understand why most authors are horrified over the translation of their novels into film. The two film versions are quite different from one another, but both take such liberties with the original text as to wonder why the film makers of each even bothered with Austen's work. The BBC production encompasses more of the tone and atmosphere of the text, the polite, mannered, upper-class social milieu of Victorian England than does the Miramax version, but both make interpretations of the text that belie the filmmakers' agenda than they do of Austen's own. The films are different from the novel in many ways, including characterization, setting, action, dialogue and theme. For example, the Miramax version of Emma with Gwyneth Paltrow portrays an Emma who is more like cupid armed with the bow of modern feminism. In the BBC version, Emma is not portrayed as lightly and as humorous. Instead, she is turned into a bantering harpy who lacks much of the charm of Austen's Emma. This analysis will compare the first chapter of Emma with the corresponding opening scene in each film. By doing so, we will see not only many differences among them (including some obtrusive additions on behalf of the films), but we will also see how the filmmakers differed in their interpretation of Austen's original.
The opening scene of each film directly corresponds to the first chapter of Austen's novel. In the text this chapter describes Emma Woodhouse as spoiled and self-willed, convinced she knows what is right for other people particularly when it comes to affairs...
... middle of paper ...
...express all the ideology of modern day feminism. Unfortunately, neither of these scenarios is faithful to the scenario of an unconventional Victorian woman as portrayed by a Victorian female author. This is not to say that the filmed versions of Emma are not entertaining or without merit in their own right. rather, it is to suggest that instead of faithfully recreating Austen's work, the filmmakers felt it necessary to add their own personal interpretations of the work, modern interpretations that serve to undermine Austen's text. Like the tightly controlled, oppressive environment of Victorian England, Austen's Emma is best understood from within the confines the ideology of that elitist microcosm, not through the lens of modern interpreters who try to impose their own values on it.
WORKS CITED
Austen, J. Emma. F. A. Thorpe Ltd., Great Britain, 1995.
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
No one knows who wrote Beowulf but we do know who wrote Grendel. John Gardner took the epic Beowulf and added more to the brilliant story. Grendel takes on the same story as Beowulf but from the perspective of Grendel, the beast in Beowulf. The story of Grendel is very interesting because from reading Beowulf it is completely uninspected. In Beowulf Grendel is said to be a disgusting monster that’s only job is to kill. In Grendel we really see him as very nice but turns to be evil because he is pushed into that direction.
In both John Gardner’s Grendel, and the poem Beowulf, there are significant differences between characters, and the way they are portrayed in each of the tellings. The interpretation of a hero is usually altered in order to fit the audience, such as, Saddam Hussein in America is made out to be this monster whereas, in his home country Iraq, he is looked at as a hero and idolized by some. In each telling, Grendel and Beowulf have many similarities in how they are described in each writing, but each character is also shown in a different light in each of the writings.
The battle with Beowulf and Grendel’s Mother is presented extremely different in the film and the text, there are many big differences.
In the original epic Beowulf, Grendel is portrayed as nothing more than the most primitive human qualities. This makes readers believe that he is a heartless brainless monster. John Gardner’s book Grendel however, introduces him as a temperamental and intelligent monster, he’s capable of completely rational thought as well as irrational outbursts of emotion. This new perspective makes him seem much more human than the original tale that he was a part of. Aside from Grendel’s horrible appearance and disgusting eating habits, very little sets him apart from humans. He is not unlike a lost puppy that’s simply misunderstood by the outside world. He struggles, within his own mind, to understand his place in a potentially meaningless world. The
Amy Heckerling’s teenage 19th century film is an updated version of Jane Austen’s satirical 1815 novel Emma. Austen differentiates expensive cars in Clueless with carriages in Emma, marijuana with malt liquor, a photograph of Tai with a portrait of Harriet, shopping, skateboarding and watching television with walks, visiting friends and backgammon. It is a contrast between proper, peaceful society of Highbury to the fast-paced society of modern Beverley Hills. Both texts share common themes which have been transformed from Victorian values to Americanised values such as the rigidity of social class and clique structures and patriarchal ideologies in relationships and marriage. The transformation of the novel allows new ideas to be presented, due to the change in values over the last centuries.
Grendel and Beowulf are two feared beings who dislike each other, but are alike and different in many ways. Grendel was a powerful monster that lived in darkness and was feared by humans. He was evil, haunted the moors, and terrorized the Danes. He was not born as a human but as a demon/monster, and was described as something sent from Hell. The Harots singing awakened Grendel, which made him attack them every night. An angry Grendel made his way through the night seeking only to capture and feast on the Danes. Hrothgar and the sleeping Danes are in for a rude awakening.
Beowulf is one of the oldest pieces of english literature that is known to this day. Grendel, written in 1971, was written based off this story from the monster, Grendel’s, perspective. Seeing thing from the perspective of the monster, rather than the first person point of view of Beowulf, allows readers to see a new side of the battle between good and evil. In Beowulf, the theme is presented that monsters are destined to be evil, and heroes are destined to have power until their last fight; however, Grendel contrasts this theme by making it clear that monsters become evil by means of isolation and others’ words and actions.
Jane Fairfax plays a significant role as a rival towards Emma in terms of intelligence and beauty in the novel Emma by Jane Austen. Jane Fairfax is born to Mrs. Bates youngest daughter and Lieut. Fairfax. Jane’s father Lieut. Fairfax died and Jane was left with a widow mother who also died when Jane was three years old. After the death of Jane’s parents, Jane was took care by Colonel Campbell who was a good friend to Mr. Fairfax where Mr. Campbell believed that Mr. Fairfax has saved his life (p.128). Jane was loved by Mrs. and Miss Bates but if she lived with them, she would have had limited opportunities through her education and her social level. From Campbells kindness Jane was educated at high standards in London by Campbells support taught by the first-rate masters. However, because Campbells could not financially support Jane forever as their fortune belonged to their daughter and from Miss Campbell’s marriage with Mr. Dixon, Jane finally comes back to Highbury where her relatives Mrs. and Miss Bates live. Jane is a character in the book Emma as an only character who could be contrasted to Emma through many natures. This essay will discuss the role of Jane Fairfax through issues such as Jane and Emma’s relationship, Jane’s relationship with Mrs. Elton in contrast to Emma’s relationship with Harriet Smith, Jane’s love relationship with Mr. Frank Churchill and discuss why Jane is the conventional heroine where Emma is not.
In the novel, Emma, Austen introduced her audience to a new idea of patriarchy. While she is known to satirize society for the “faulty education of female children, limited expectations for girls and women, and the perils of the marriage market” (“Austen, Jane”). Austen expresses the irony of the men of her patriarchal society and proposes the ideal gentleman in Mr. Knightley. In Emma, Austen moves away from “a traditional idea of 'natural' male supremacy towards a 'modern' notion of gender equity” (Marsh). Jane Austen is a revolutionary in the way she transforms the idea of Nineteenth Century patriarchy by not “reinforcing the traditional gender stereotypes” (Rosenbury) but instead challenging the status quo. While her characters still hold some ties to traditional ideals, Austen proves to be ahead of her time, influencing the way gender is regarded today.
McMurray's test, locking and Giving Way were the independent factors for diagnosis that predicted a correct 80 percent in the meniscal tear diagnosis during arthroscopy. In regards to MRI, the combined values of the three tests (locking, Giving way and McMurray) were as follows: 88,90,90 for accuracy, 96, 97,97 for sensitivity, 74,76,74 for specificity, 87,88,88 for PPV and 90, 94,94 for NPV.
Emma, a novel by Jane Austen, is the story of a young woman, Emma, who is rich, stubborn, conniving, and occupies her time meddling into others' business. There are several recurring themes throughout the novel; the ideas of marriage, social class, women's confinement, and the power of imagination to blind the one from the truth, which all become delineated and reach a climax during the trip to Box Hill. The scene at Box Hill exposes many underlying emotions that have been built up throughout the novel, and sets the stage for the events that conclude it.
They did this in many ways. They made Beowulf a more relatable character and changed some plot lines to connect part of the story. Grendel’s mother is the key point of change in the film adaptation. She is portrayed as a beautiful and stunning water-demon instead of a horrific monster. Her devious trap to seduce any brave warrior that comes to her lair gives an origin of Grendel’s existence. In addition, it connects the halves of the story and makes the rest of the movie relevant (Wood). The writers didn’t completely change the story, they just used bits and pieces that were in the poem to make the story more viewer friendly. An example is the golden dragon cup. This object was in the poem, but in the movie it becomes much more
Within the novel, Jane Austen’s exploits of irony are shown linked throughout Emma’s notions of love and the real within her own society. Emma’s lack of education on the concepts of love is quite evident within her apathy towards Frank Churchill as her opinions are deeply rooted within her own affections, as she states, “Emma continued to entertain no doubt of her being in love. Her ideas only varied as to the how much. At first, she thought it was a good deal; and afterwards, but little. She had great pleasure in hearing Frank Churchill talked of; and for his sake, greater pleasure than ever in seeing Mr. and Mrs. Weston; she was very often thinking of him. But, on the other hand, she could not admit herself to be unhappy, nor, after the first morning, to be less disposed for employment than usual; she was still busy and cheerful; and, pleasing as he was, she could yet imagine him to have faults,” (Austen 264). Emma’s sketch of Harriet is another illustration of irony surrounded by Emma’s arrogance as it does not portray an accurate depiction of Harriet as Emma has altered ...
...Emma’s voice in order to relate the inside ideology, while simultaneously using a somewhat ironic third-person narrative voice in order to provide critical social commentary on the social attitudes of the Highbury society depicted in Emma. Emma’s voice allows the reader to gain an unadultered insight into the lives of the people of Highbury, providing the narrative with a Austen uses a somewhat similar dichotomous technique in Persuasion, in which she splits the novel into two halves -- one in which advocates for the traditional system of formality, and another that works to eradicate the very same system that she extolled so highly in the first half. Under the deceptive guise of “political inaction,” Austen actually provides commentary on the underlying social and political issues that pervade the novel through the literary technique of heteroglossia (Parker 359).