Comparing Virtue, Deontological, And Utilitarian Theories

644 Words2 Pages

First of all I would like to mention, that Virtue, Deontological, and Utilitarian theories are the tools to justify people, groups or institutions’ behavior. What is wrong and what is right we identify regarding the personal point of view. Therefore, everybody assesses the same situation, action or result according to own moral and ethical background. Each of the theories mentioned above have distinct advantages and disadvantages and lead to different results of human action. Thus, the desired outcome is the key criteria to decide which theory suits most of the exact situation. Finally, the decision to use the exact principle of ethics will depend on the personal character and moral values. The self-improvement and development is main focus for Virtue ethics theory. …show more content…

The level of ethics is evaluated concerning the ability to obey the rules professionally. Unlike the Utilitarian theory requires, the understanding of the big picture and achievement of exact end state is not important. The key point is just to act as ordered without concerns about outcomes. Such kind of thinking is not the best choice for Army leader because the leaders must seek the tangible results. Utilitarian ethics theory differs from Virtue and Deontological ethics as well. The results of the action are main focus for the supporters of Utilitarian ethics. The desired outcome is the key factor and all the measures to achieve the aim can be justified. The sacrifice is acceptable too. In this case, the main dilemma is to find the right balance between the fulfillment of the mission and moral beliefs. The Army leaders must understand higher commander’s intent and mission in order to implement Utilitarian ethics concept in the mission. In conclusion, the theories mentioned above are incompatible to each other. The detailed assessment desired outcome must be conducted before the implementation of one these

Open Document