Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critically analyse the passionate shepherd to his love
Poetic devices and figurative language
The passionate shepherd to his love, paradox
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing The Passionate Shepherd To His Love, Her Reply, and Cecil Day Lewis
When looking at these three poems, it immediately becomes noticeable that all of them are very similar. They often share the same lines, almost word for word, and furthermore follow a smilar tone, as well as having an identical rhyming pattern. „The passionate shepherd to his love“ (poem number one) is followed by an answer from his lover (poem number two), and is then followed up by a further poem by Cecil Day Lewis, which like in poem number one, is an attempt at winning a ladies heart over, and convincing her to devote all her love to him.
The first poem seems to be an idyillic one, and spends a lot of time going into the description of the surrounding nature. Christopher Marlowe describes the countryside as being pure and beautiful, and seems to be trying to suggest that his love is also something natural and pure.
„That hills and valley, dales and fields,
Or woods or steepy mountain yields“
However it almost seems as though it is too good to be true, as one knows that nature also conceals many dangers. However he takes it further than that, and seems to try and build up a kind of utopia for his love talking about treating her as well as he possibly can.
„And I will make thee a bed of roses,
And a thousand fragrant posies“
However the poet is now attempting to build up such a perfect image of their possible life together, that it becomes ever more unrealistic. The answer from the lady whose heart he is trying to win over however, takes a far more realistic approach, and seems to try and bring him back down to earth. She makes him aware of the fact that time brings change, an...
... middle of paper ...
..., but in the closing two lines of the last stanza in poems in and three the poets once again use the same lines to express their feelings.
„If these delights thy mind may move,
Then live with me and be my Love.“
To conclude the comparison of the three given poems it must be said that they are very similar, and in certain aspects even identical. The only exception to this seems to be the second poem, which was a reply to the first. Despite talking about the same topic, and being directly linked to the first poem, it is very different, as it is not attempting to proclaim the poets love, but is turning it down. Equally the last poem differs slightly due to different circumstances. Yet all of them are attempting to show the reader (or the person it is meant for), what the poets feelings towards that person is, by using very descriptive language.
Both poems are set in the past, and both fathers are manual labourers, which the poets admired as a child. Both poems indicate intense change in their fathers lives, that affected the poet in a drastic way. Role reversal between father and son is evident, and a change of emotion is present. These are some of the re-occurring themes in both poems. Both poems in effect deal with the loss of a loved one; whether it be physically or mentally.
These poems have quite a few similarities, as well as their differences. Mariam Waddington’s, “Thou Didst Say Me,” displays love being overly joyous but also heart-breaking and despondent. On the other hand Alfred Tennyson’s, “Now Sleeps the Crimson Petal,” depicts a sugary love story all calm and beautiful. Both offered their end of the bargain: conflicting sentiments toward love relations to the table and ultimately delivering a unique testimony about the subject of, love. And as always love may have its golden tragedies but one always has a hold of their own feelings of love.
Therefore, one can see that these poems although similar in their title and central image of the star differ in their themes, form and treatment of the author's ideas.
These two poems may seem like very similar poems at first glance, but when they are picked apart line for line to find the true meaning, they are much different. The underlying themes of these poems aren’t even close to one another. One poem describes a moment that changed a teenager’s life, causing him to mature in the process. The other poem describes how nature, man, and technology can hurt and better each other. By saying these poems are the same simply because they are about animals dying would be merely scratching the surface of what these poems are about.
Both poets want to be loved in the poems in their own way. While both poem’s present a theme of love, it is obvious that the poet’s view on love changes from how they view love at the beginning of the poem from how they see it at the end.
“The Wanderer” is a tale that mostly likely would have been recited by a scop. The stories that the scops would tell often were elegies for the heroic dead.
Although the imagery in each poem is distinct, the similarity of message in both poems is evident. The poems are similar in that the narrator’s lives are empty and contain no passion for pursuing anything. The ideas reflected in these poems are seen even today, in such things as listless living and job-related apathy. Both poems suggest that a life where dreams of meaningless things are pursued will end without purpose or significance.
To start with, one of the most important ways to prevent the abuse of power in any system is to keep it out of the hands of the few and put it into the hands of the many. This is exactly what the American jury system
These two poems, For My Daughter, and Her Kind are greatly different but in a few ways the same. The few ways they are the same are very important and have great meaning behind it. The female in both of their poems, the use of nature, the sadness in the narrators voice and the darkness of the two poems both have in
Friar Lawrence is the primary instigator for the death of Romeo and Juliet’s death. He is regarded as the guiding light for salvation in the town of Verona as he supposed to act as the moral compass for the Veronese; however, he does not carry out his moral responsibility to help the disillusioned Romeo. When Romeo approached him with the intent to marry Juliet, Friar Lawrence replies, “I’ll thy assistant be” (2.3.90) in attempt to “turn [Romeo’s] households’ rancor to pure love” (2.3.93). Regardless of the fact that Friar Lawrence is fully aware of Romeo’s superficial love for Juliet as Romeo clings to any beautiful woman he sees, he still sees this as an opportunity to reconcile the burning hatred between the Capulets and Montague, disregarding the fact that their dangerous infatuation might bring misfortune and misery for the two misguided youth. He continually acts on idea of the greater good, neglecting the safety of the two star-crossed lovers. When Juliet is forced to marry the county, Juliet “long[s] to die” (4.1.68), and as a result, Friar Lawrence gives Juliet a sleeping potion where “[her] pulse… surcease” (4.1.99) to make her seemingly dead to reunite her with Romeo. To avoid bigamy, Friar Lawrence acts impulsively rather than rationally as he concocts a dangerous plan, giving a deadly potion in the hands of an innocent girl without consid...
With rainwater comes mud, which made it hard for soldiers to keep their legs and feet dry since they were basically submerged in around three meters of mud. Soldiers would easily get trench foot, which eventually made your foot rot off of your body. It is difficult to imagine just how bad these trenches smelt and how bad they were to live in.
I have now discussed all three poems with you and I have to say that
When considering the structure of the poems, they are similar in that they are both written loosely in iambic pentameter. Also, they both have a notable structured rhyme scheme.
On the other side, “Love Poem” is very different from the previous poem. This seven stanza poem is based on a man describing the imperfections of his lover. In this, the speaker uses stylistic devices, such as alliteration and personification to impact more on reader, for example as the speaker shows “your lipstick ginning on our coat,”(17) ...
In conclusion, the three poems share the same theme throughout them. The theme of strength and unity can be seen as a commonality between three different poems. Written by prominent black writers, these poems can be seen as a message for garnering a unification through the strength of black