Comparing The End Of Cooking And Why Mcdonald's Fries Taste So Good

951 Words2 Pages

The essays “The End of Cooking?” by Michael Pollan and “Why McDonald's Fries Taste so Good” by Eric Schlosser and the documentary Food, Inc. directed by Robert Kenner are all three very effective in how they get their message across to their audience, but each one is very different in how the material is presented. The End of Cooking? focuses on how pre-packaged food and the fast food industry have changed the way Americans cook and is told in a very conversational manner. Why McDonald's Fries Taste so Good feature is more in depth as it features how both artificial and natural flavors were both developed and used to enhance foods. Food, Inc. is a documentary about agribusiness and details how the industrial farms produce food that is unhealthy for people to eat, bad for the environment and how the companies are abusive to animals and the people hired to work on the farms. …show more content…

Schlosser's essay starts off by telling us why McDonald's fries taste so good to us. Its an almost universal theme because who among us has never eaten a french fry from McDonald's. He then tells us how in an attempt to make them healthier the beef tallow used in the cooking oil was replaced and an artificial flavoring was added to the fries to make them still taste the same. Through the essay, he tossed in tidbits to keep our interest while presenting his evidence such as how grape flavoring was discovered. Pollan's essay is almost wistful as he details how he would watch Julia Child cooking on television with his mother and then is concerned that Food Network is “turning cooking into a spectator sport.” Schlosser's essay is informative whereas Pollan's is almost

Open Document