Comparing Sigmund Freud's Perspective On Suicide And Parenting

1843 Words4 Pages

One of the most impressive discussions concerning death is put forward by the prominent figure of the twentieth century Sigmund Freud. As Freud put it, “Probably no one finds the mental energy required to kill himself unless, in the first place, in doing so he is at the same time killing an object with whom he has identified himself, and, in the second place, is turning against himself a death-wish which had been directed against someone else” (Freud 78). Symbolically, harming the parent or other victimizer is too painful, so the victim turns his or her anger inward. Another way of seeing it is that the parent has been so profoundly internalized that the victim is in fact attacking the other when he or she commits suicide. In both these interpretations, …show more content…

This new principle, the compulsion to repeat, has an instinctual character and overrides the pleasure principle, demanding a return to painful experiences. Freud’s hypothesis is that the traumatic experience, which caught the affected person unprepared and therefore shocks her, has as a result captured a large portion of energy. The repetition and return to the event is an attempt to regain a sense of control over the unexpected circumstance and to experience it without the original fright. On Freud’s view, a similar event that is accompanied by physical trauma does not cause the same compulsion to repeat, because the trapped energy has been released as physical …show more content…

The drives aim to promote the expression of the inertia inherent in organic life and change is strictly the result of an external disturbance of this inertia. If this claim is followed to its logical end, it must be concluded that the most fundamental aim of every living creature is to return to an inanimate form, which is the earliest state of things in organic terms, or in other words, to die. In this sense – a restricted instinctual sense that comprises only half of the instinctual domain (the other half being Eros) – “the aim of all life is death” (111). This leads Freud to the paradoxical conclusion that life is a detour on the way to death, based on “the drive to return to the inanimate state” (156). He writes:

Seen in this light, the theoretical importance of the drives of self preservation, of self assertion and of mastery greatly diminishes […] We have no longer to reckon with the organism’s puzzling determination to maintain its own existence in the face of every obstacle. What we are left with is the fact that the organism wishes to die only in its own fashion

Open Document