Comparing Paul's Case And Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?

2507 Words6 Pages

The reality of life is that it is fair to no one. This idea is expressed in both Willa Cather's "Paul's Case" and Joyce Carol Oates' "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?". Cather dives into the life of the young teenager, Paul, who does not enjoy his life at all. He loathes his father and his home, so he goes on the run to get away from it all to try and live a better life. However, his fantasy is broken once life does not go his way, so he ends up committing suicide in order to escape his fate. Oates crafts a similar story in which the main character, Connie, faces the trouble of kidnapping by the sinister character Arnold Friend. Connie wishes for the threat to not be sincere, but the reality of her situation caves down on her and she …show more content…

Paul was too scared to face his problems at home, so he decided to go on the run and try to live a life away from it. However, once he found out his dad was actually searching for him, he became scared because he did not want to end up back in the hands of Cordelia Street. Paul's uneasiness to accept that his dad was searching for him was because of his longing to avoid the life of Cordelia Street. This fear of accepting reality as a way to get around the truth is evident in the main character, Connie, from "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?". In an article written by Joyce Wegs, she describes how "Connie's fear drives her into a grotesque separation of mind from body" when she is confronted by Arnold Friend (Wegs 5). A huge amount of terror comes over Connie when she has her encounter with Arnold Friend, so much that she cannot even think straight after. She is overcome with the fear of facing that horrible man to the point where she just gives up and succumbs to him. This great terror of coming face to face with Arnold is driven by her wish to leave behind the truth of her

Open Document