Comparing Kaur's 'Breast Cancer, The Environment And Protection'

1240 Words3 Pages

Jessica D’Angelo (0765801)
Assignment #2
GEOG*3090 (F14)
Professor: Roberta Hawkins
Gender and the Environment

In this assignment, I will be examining the work Breast Cancer, the Environment & Protection by Sat Dharam Kaur (2003, 44-46). I will argue that the article presents a strong ecofeminist view, and I will support this argument through evidence from Women in Nature, by Vandana Shiva (1989). I will also scrutinize how feminist environmentalism, feminist political ecology and post-structural gender and environment may or may not be applicable to this case. The article by Sat Dharam Kaur (2003) illustrates the importance of being conscious of the daily decisions we make in regards to our personal health. Ensuring …show more content…

“I think of the breast…as the epitomy of the planetary tree of life” (Kaur, 2003, 44). 
 Shiva’s (1989) concept of dualisms play a large role in this article. The author makes it clear that the male/culture dualism is more prominent in society than that of female/nature: “Many of these are choices of convenience…spraying our lawns with pesticides, packaging and storing food in plastic containers and flushing the toilet—which indirectly threaten the survival of our species” (Kaur, 2003). According to Kaur, the ‘right’ choices to make concerning the environment is through health of women’s breasts, and subsequently, through breast milk. The solution: to put women’s health and the environment above convenience. This would result in the rearrangement of the hierarchy of male/culture and the female/nature dualisms, putting women and nature above men and convenience. This is the solution to solving environmental problems, according to Shiva (1989, …show more content…

The author looks at men and women on an individual scale: “We can eat lower on the food chain, consuming a primarily vegetarian diet…whether you are a man or a woman, if you plan to have children one day, do an intense sauna detoxification at least 6 months before conceiving” (Kaur, 2003, 45). In this sense, it focuses on the daily choices both men and women make, although it still puts a heavier emphasis on women’s responsibilities to ‘save’ the environment. There is no mention of the socially constructed roles of women and men, but only the biological differences being the cause for the dependency on women to preserve the health of mother earth. It is not illustrated that gender influences roles, nor do roles influence what it means to be of a certain gender. Kaur (2003) believes it to be a biological responsibility to protect the planet. Although, Kaur (2003) focuses on the local scale, due to global institutions, such as laws surrounding the protection and purity of breastmilk: “what does it mean when this perfect food has no laws that protect it, no health practitioners who systematically test its purity” (Kaur, 2003, 44), therefore it has a minute element of feminist political

More about Comparing Kaur's 'Breast Cancer, The Environment And Protection'

Open Document