Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis essay on inherit the wind
The theme of inherit the wind
THE INherit the wind essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the fantastic play “Inherit the Wind” by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee the epic and historical battle of evolution versus the Biblical account of creation was revealed in the downtown Hillsboro courthouse. The play illustrated the dramatic nature of the original Scopes “Monkey” trial that took place in Dayton, Tennessee in the year 1925. In the original trial the two opposing attorneys were William Jennings Bryan as the prosecutor and Clarence Darrow as the defense. However, in this vivid play the diverse yet similar characters of Matthew Harrison Brady as Bryan and Henry Drummond as Darrow are set at odds as their opposition of beliefs led them to fight each other’s differences.
The prosecuting attorney Brady is a complete opposite
…show more content…
of Drummond. In Brady’s pursuit to make the Biblical account of creation prevail in the schools against liberals such as Drummond who oppose and revile what Brady considers to be the only logical explanation of the world’s creation. In the play Brady was the man of the Bible believing community. Brady was the perfect prosecuting attorney to have in this trial; it would not have been right for anyone else to attempt to defeat the intimidating defense attorney Drummond. Brady had ran several times in the presidential race but with no avail as he was never actually elected. Although he was not elected he was still held in high regard for at least running the race. Therefore because of Brady’s well known stature as a leader in the aspect of defending the Christian religion against the “modern” and new theories of evolution he was chosen and brought to Hillsboro to be the man to destroy the new theories of evolution. There are many reasons that made Brady such a unique person and some of these include his: large size, excellent orating ability, fundamental beliefs, outstanding ability to undermine the evolutionary theories, and as stated earlier, his political position. His large size was important because it made his character the jovial and intimidating character that was likeable by most everyone. It was his excellent orating ability that gave him the edge over many others who lack the kind of assuring and first-rate speech quality that Brady had mastered. His fundamental beliefs allowed him to have a very solid foundation that he could take advantage of as to gain favor by those who had similar beliefs and also to allow him to make bold statements of faith. In the play he was also a leader in the resistance of evolution, making him a very important and almost necessary man to have in the trial. Brady was also an important figure to have in the prosecuting stand for the reason that he was not only determined to defeat evolution but also the attorney who defended the evolutionary teachings, who in this case, also happened to be a once friend but now long time rival of Brady, Henry Drummond. The two were separated by their different views of life as Brady wanted to continue in the traditions of God and His laws, and Drummond wanted to move with the crowd and society to whatever the most recent scientific discovery had theorized. When Brady arrives in Hillsboro the day before the beginning of the trial he is welcomed with applause and respectful greetings.
The welcome that he receives accurately reveals who Brady was and what he meant to the people there. He wasn’t just some distant politician who had come simply to make himself a name and standing in that part of the country. To the people of Hillsboro he was a great man, a man worthy of applause, a parade, and even a buffet lunch. Brady had come to defend, and the people knew it, and were ready to help the man in their common pursuit to defeat evolution. He is so liked by the people there that he is even given an honorary title by the mayor as Honorary Colonel in the State …show more content…
Militia. Brady is the leader among the common people, making a connection with the people with their shared beliefs and standings. Therefore he was able to feel relaxed and a little too cocky as he eventually was not just fighting for the people but also for his ego. He was not in the least perfect but definitely wanted to be. Brady’s overconfidence eventually lead him to accept Drummonds want to call him to the stand. Brady answers Drummond’s questions but as he does he makes a fool out of himself as he mixes up his Biblical knowledge and in the end supports Drummond. It was as if Brady knew he was going to come out on top after the trial, but he was over confident which made him completely forget that it was not really himself that the towns people liked but it was really what he stood for that the people liked. Truthfully, the people liked Brady but they wanted more of what he stood for to prevail and not just himself to prevail. Drummond, the defendant, was also the perfect man to be chosen to defend the new and changing views of evolution. In the play he was similar to Brady in that he was brought up in a decent home, a loving family, and with traditional values. Brady and Drummond became friends but eventually their contrasting views about life and the way to view it pulled their friendship apart never to be pulled back together. Drummond then became prominent in his group of people just as Brady became prominent in his. They were of a like trade, they enjoyed what they did, and they were good at what they did, it was only their different views of life and creation that they were not on the same team. It was as if they had been on the same baseball team in middle school but then they graduated with the one going to play on one college team because of one reason while the other went to play for another college for another reason. Essentially the two were playing the same sport but on opposing teams because of different choices of different colleges. As Brady was the man for the creationist, Drummond was the man for the evolutionist, as Brady was a big man, Drummond was also a big man, and as Brady was a good orator, Drummond was alsoa good orator.
Just as they were similar in background they were also similar in their conduct. From their speech to their largeness they were alike. They were also the best that each side had to offer. Drummond could quickly change his views to fit what constantly changed while Brady was the one who had the ability to stick with what he believed. He wasn’t going to change his views to fit what the new theories brought about but he was willing to stick up for what he believed making him a prominent and respectful man. Drummond was also willing to stand up for what he believed although he was even more brave than Brady because at that time there were still so many that believed in the Bible that it was a very hard thing to stand up for an evolutionary theory that so many were adamantly opposed
to. Drummond arrived in Hillsboro to receive welcome from only one person who also happened to be a liberal man working for the newspaper. Unlike Brady, Drummond is not the highly respected, in fact, Drummond is held in low regard because of his evolutionary standings. It was not so much his person but rather what he stood for that made the people disregard him and call him a devil. It was in this same way that people treated Brady, with a like to his opinions, not his being. As the trial begins Drummond interrogates people asking them odd questions and treating them with disrespect unlike the way that Brady treated people, that is, with respect to their lives. Although they both possessed a quality of being able to be rude to the opposite team, much like the way that one college team would be mouthy and rude to the other. Eventually the trial ends; there was officially no winner but unofficially everyone watching the trial knew that Drummond had come out on top. Although because of their extreme similarities one might think that they would be an even match and that neither would come out on top but I the end because of how the two contrasted each other Drummonds differences seemed to be a little more excellent as he was able to lower Brady’s pride. Over all, Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond had their similarities, from their upbringing to how they were both the best that the fundamentalists and modernists had to offer. While they were the same in some aspects they were they were also different in that Brady was on the creationist side and Drummond was on the evolutionist side. Brady was also the respectful, considerate one while Drummond was the aggressive and rude one of the two. These two characters will be seen as some of the most perfect opposites for time to come, as their legacy of greatly defending their beliefs lasts for ages to come.
3. My teacher gave a test a week; a predilection that most of the class disliked.
However, in the 1920s, his persuasive speaking and motivation to challenge ideas earned him a spot back on top (People & Events). Though different instances are being compared, both show how Drummond or Darrow were bright enough to get themselves out of difficult situations. Yet while both men overcame their obstacles, both of them let their achievements build their ego, causing them to act out on
There are many differences between the author Harper Lee and Theodor Seuss. One of the main differences between them is their writing styles. Dr. Seuss and Harper Lee have different literature topics which sets them apart. Another element that sets them apart is how well-known Dr. Seuss is compared to Harper Lee. Also the two authors have very different word choices and styles.
one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it is a sin to
In the novel Monkey Girl: Evolution, Religion, and The battle for American’s Soul, Humes tells the story of how 11 furious parents in the Dover Area school district decided to sue the school board and the district, because of the new learning objective requirement saying that all of 9th grade biology classes had to be taught Intelligent Design (ID), which is basically a form of creationism as a scientific alternative to evolution. They also believed that it “violated their first amendment right to information and ideas in an academic setting” (Humes, 2007, p. 221). This was the first legal trial to the perception of Intelligent Design. This novel is a narrative that captures nearly everyone’s view point in the Dover Area school District on the issue of Intelligent Design replacing evolution. There were numerous groups and organizations involved the trial including; The American Civil Liberties Union, Americans Unites for Separation of Church and State, Pepper Hamilton LLP, and the National Center for Science Education. This Trial was so major that even that national government was involved. George W. Bush sent a conservative appointee (John Jones) to the bench, which was done because it was “the early handicapping in the trial suggested a
...lues. As the camera physically turns towards Drummond, Kramer leans towards evolutionism. Not only does this scene confirm Kramer's belief in the theory of evolution; it also expresses reason for Kramer's reservations regarding Christianity. With Drummond's metaphor of the "Golden Dancer, " Kramer enlightens the audience with some of the shortcomings of religion, such as susceptibility to corruption of the church. The porch scene in Inherit the Wind is not completely one sided though. It acknowledges the existence of both theories, resolving that the debate between creationism and evolutionism will continue forever.
You know Dasher and Dancer and Prancer and Vixen. You know Comet and Cupid and Donner and Blitzen. But do you recall the most famous reindeer of all? Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer was misperceived at first. All of the other reindeer used to laugh and call him names, but after he led Santa’s sleigh, they loved him. Misperceptions like this happen all throughout Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. As you read the novel you see original judgments made about characters transform into new conceptions and new understandings. Some characters twist your views of them on purpose, others do it involuntarily. To Kill a Mockingbird shows this happening over and over again. All you have to do is look for it.
The Scopes Monkey Trial was a beginning of independent thought throughout the country. After the trial, it stayed on the books until a 1967 Supreme Court Case overturned the Butler Act and declared it unconstitutional. In the end, evolution can finally be taught; students can examine the research that Charles Darwin did and understand why Darwin came to his belief in evolution. People can study this and decide for themselves.
simple terms: either Darwin or the Bible was true.” (265) The road to the trial began when Tennessee passed the Butler Act in 1925 banning the teaching of evolution in secondary schools. It was only a matter of time before a young biology teacher, John T. Scopes, prompted by the ACLU, tested the law. Spectators and newspapermen came from all over to witness whether science or religion would win the day. Yet, below all the hype, the trial had a deeper meaning.
In Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee’s tense drama, “Inherit the Wind”, three strong characters express powerful opinions: Bertrum Cates , Henry Drummond, and Mathew Harrison Brady. First, Bert Cates, the defendant, is charged with teaching “Darwinism” to his sophomore class . Second, Henry Drummond, the defense attorney for Cates, displays his beliefs of the right to think. third, Mathew Harrison Brady, the “big-shot” prosecuting attorney, illustrates his bigotry of creationism. To conclude, these three essential characters are fighting for their personal beliefs.
Charles Darwin, the Father of Evolution, was a British scientist who laid the foundations of the theory of evolution, transforming the thinking of the entire world about the living things around us (Charles Darwin (1809 – 1882)). After working on his theory for nearly 20 years, he published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859. As soon as the book was released, the controversy began with each sides gaining followers until the climax on July 10, 1925. The idea that animals could “evolve” and change into new species, including humans, was one that challenged not only how people thought about the natural world, but challenged the story of the creation from the Bible itself. Even though Darwin himself never said that humans “evolved” from apes, everyone took it as a logical extension of his new theory. It went against the idea of argument for design that had unified theology and science for decades (Moran 5). This new threat to Christianity and the social culture of the time was one that would transform state laws on their educational curriculum.
To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee tells the story of a little girl growing up in a small Southern town during the 1930s, and facing everyday issues such as racism and growing up, and The Help by Kathryn Stockett shows the lives of black maids in the 1960s working for white women and feeling the effects of both racism and friendship from them. Despite the fact that the two books are from different time periods, The Help and To Kill A Mockingbird by are very similar novels because Celia Foote and Mayella Ewell both come from poor, white families, because both books examine society’s oppressive expectations of women from that era, and because both books show white people’s good relationships with the black people that work for them.
The 1920’s were a time of change. New ideas were becoming more readily experimented with and even accepted by large portions of the population. Some of these included jazz music and the fight against the alcoholic prohibition. The radical idea I will focus on in this paper, however, is Evolution. It is a theory that had been around for over half a century before the 20’s but had only more recently caught on in the US. It contradicted the Christian theory of Divine Creation as described in the Bible. This caused many religious fundamentalists to fight against it. They took their battle to the law books, and they were challenged by pro-evolution modernists in the Scopes "Monkey Trial" of 1925.
John Thomas Scopes, a math teacher and football coach for Rhea County High School in Dayton, Tennessee, was pressured into taking the challenge by a friend, George Rappleyea, who saw the advertisement. With the school’s biology teacher out for the last two weeks of class, Scopes took over and began teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution. Soon after, he was arrested and charged with a violation of the Butler Act. Contrary to popular understanding, the worst punishment for this crime was a small fine.
Nelle Harper Lee, the famous author of the worldwide bestseller To Kill a Mockingbird, was born April 28th, 1926, to Amasa Coleman (a lawyer) and Frances Lee. At the time, the family lived in Monroeville, Alabama. Harper’s family was somewhat wealthy, and they lived in upper middle class society most of their lives. Harper’s birth name, Nelle, was her grandmother’s spelled backwards (Ellen). However, in her publications, she took her middle name, Harper, to avoid being known as “Nellie”. But what numerous people have never heard - and many would be shocked to know - is that one windy, rainy night, Harper threw all her unpublished manuscripts of To Kill a Mockingbird out the window! Fortunately, she soon realized what she had done, and called over her editor, Tay Hohoff, to assist her. Hohoff sent her out in the snow and slush to retrieve her pages, which luckily had not fallen far away. But one would wonder: what would have happened if she had done the same on a slightly windier night?