Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Evolution and religious beliefs
How evolution and religion connect
Evolution religion vs science
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Evolution and religious beliefs
Monkey Girl: Evolution, Religion, and The battle for America’s Soul, is a non-fiction based novel that was written by Edward Humes. Edward Humes is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author, who was born and raised in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Humes has also written various publications, which include Los Angeles Magazine, Sierra Magazine, Readers Digest, and many more (Humes). Throughout Monkey Girl: Evolution, Religion, and The battle for America’s Soul, the focus is on the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial. It all began in 2004 when the Dover Area School District of Pennsylvania decided to modify the curriculum in biology, which required that Intelligent Design to be taught as a part of the scientific theory of evolution …show more content…
and also that the book, Of Pandas and People, be used as a supplemental textbook. In the novel, Humes provided the reader with the historical background on the controversy of evolution. He does this by writing a very descriptive narrative that includes complete details of the Kitzmiller v. Dover trail regarding Intelligent Design. The first case of evolution was in 1925, it was known as The Scopes Monkey Trial. “Scopes Trial is one of the best known in American history because it symbolizes the conflict between science and theology, faith and reason, individual liberty and majority rule” (Digital History, 2014). John Scopes a school was taken to court for violating the state law that banned evolution from being taught in school. Tennessee's anti-evolution law was thrown out for violating the Constitution's prohibition against the establishment of religion (Digital History, 2014). “The Scopes trial resulted in two enduring conclusions: that legislatures should not restrain the freedom of scientific inquiry and that society should respect academic freedom” (Digital History, 2014). The Scopes Trial was very similar to the Kitzmiller v. Dover Trial; Humes described it in the novel as the “second coming of the legendary Scopes Monkey Trial” (Humes, 2007, p. Prolouge 2). This court case brought back up the argument between form of creationism, intelligent design, and also the debate of separation of church and state.
In the novel Monkey Girl: Evolution, Religion, and The battle for American’s Soul, Humes tells the story of how 11 furious parents in the Dover Area school district decided to sue the school board and the district, because of the new learning objective requirement saying that all of 9th grade biology classes had to be taught Intelligent Design (ID), which is basically a form of creationism as a scientific alternative to evolution. They also believed that it “violated their first amendment right to information and ideas in an academic setting” (Humes, 2007, p. 221). This was the first legal trial to the perception of Intelligent Design. This novel is a narrative that captures nearly everyone’s view point in the Dover Area school District on the issue of Intelligent Design replacing evolution. There were numerous groups and organizations involved the trial including; The American Civil Liberties Union, Americans Unites for Separation of Church and State, Pepper Hamilton LLP, and the National Center for Science Education. This Trial was so major that even that national government was involved. George W. Bush sent a conservative appointee (John Jones) to the bench, which was done because it was “the early handicapping in the trial suggested a
judge who would take a narrow approach to the case” (Humes, 2007, p. 258). This trial lasted from September 26 to November 4, 2014 (Humes, 2007, p. 324). The court heard extensively from both sides, including those who were specialists on and for Intelligent Design and those who supported traditional non-theistic science approach. While reading the novel it becomes evident that several of the individuals that are rejecting evolution are rejecting it without actually understanding evolution. This becomes clear when Humes states that “52 percent of those with Bachelor’s degree except evolution; but only 20 percent of American’s with high school educations or less believe evolutionary theory is well supported by the fact” (Humes, 2007, p. 28) and also when he states that one young man responded that, “I’m afraid to learn too much about evolution, because it might make me doubt my religion”. Several other “problems” were named, but these problems had no relevance to evolution. On December 20, 2005, Judge Jones rendered his opinion on the case, it was a 139 page ruling which explained his ruling and his evidence to support it. Judge Jones ruled in favor of the plaintiffs affirming that the plaintiffs were right on the position that Intelligent Design is not science .When the next school board election came around, all those members that favored the addition of Intelligent Design in the districts science curriculum were voted out of office (Humes, 2007, p. 350). Judge Jones final ruling stated that Intelligent Design was not a science and that is could not be taught in the classroom, because it violates the Separation Clause. Jones also found that the school board had lied under oath and that they wanted to introduce religion into the science classroom. Judge Jones concluded his case with the words, “The facts of this case make it abundantly clear that the Board's ID policy violates the Establishment Clause. In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that is it’s not and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents” (Humes, 2007, pp. 331-332) . Overall I believe that Monkey Girl: Evolution, Religion, and The battle for American’s Soul is a pretty interesting book. Being that the book is a narrative it allows the reader to fully engage with the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial. Humes includes a large amount of detail about the trial, it’s as if you were actually sitting in the courts audience. He allows you to get the point of view and the ideas of almost every individual mentioned even the most tenacious, stubborn, and flawed individuals. For example, when Angie Yingling was asked to explain how she retrieved her understanding of intelligent design, she stated that she retrieved her information about intelligent design from “People magazine while standing in checkout lines at the grocery store and in Wal-Mart. Then she quickly added that she had also read portions of an issue of National Geographic in a doctor’s waiting room” (Humes, 2007, p. 226). Humes’ thorough description of this moment allows the reader to visualize that moment and how the court responded to her expert understanding of intelligent design. There are several other examples in the novel where you can see the unawareness on the subject of intelligent design. I like the way that Humes includes every detail about the unawareness of the school board on Intelligent Design. These descriptions allowed me to know the case a lot better. Humes uses about two hundred pages just to set the stage of the legal debate so that his audience is able to grasp the information that he his is trying to display. Humes hides his opinion so that the reader can get balanced understanding of the case and its background. I believe that Monkey Girl: Evolution, Religion, and The battle for American’s Soul is a very well written book that leaves little to no confusion with the reader when reading. Although the reader most likely already knows the outcome of the trail Humes’ descriptions leaves you on the edge wondering what will happen next.
Character Development in Edward Abbey's The Monkey Wrench Gang. Search and Rescue, Utah State Police, and Bishops of the Church of Latter-Day Saints chase a group of bridge destroying, billboard burning, bulldozer mutilating eco-terrorists through the desert of the Southwest. The group known as the Monkey Wrench Gang consists of four very different characters: Seldom Seen Smith, also known as Joseph Smith, George Washington Hayduke, Doctor A. K. Sarvis, and Bonnie Abbzug. Each character has his own opinion of why nature needs to be saved. The group decides to make their mark on nature by "taking care" of the different machines, roads and bridges that are destroying it.
Hazel is the main character and narrator of "Gorilla, My Love," by Toni Cade Bambara. She is between the ages of ten or twelve years old and an African American girl living in Harlem, New York with her family. While riding in the car with her grandfather, her uncle Jefferson Winston Vale, aka Hunca Bubba, and her little brother in the beginning of the story story's, she learns that Hunca Bubba, is in love and plans to be married. This angers Hazel, and she thinks back to an Easter Sunday when she and her brothers went to the movies.
Firstly, in the town of Hillsboro teaching the theory of evolution to students was strictly against the law. Bert Cates was in opposition to this idea and, he believed that every student had the right to know about the Origin of species. Teaching the theory of evolution was against the law because it contradicted the teachings
The Dover Area School District of Dover, Pennsylvania is seeking approval from the General Assembly of Pennsylvania House to include the theory of intelligent design in the instruction of biology. Intelligent design, also known as I.D., is a theory that seeks to refute the widely-accepted and scientifically-supported evolution theory. It proposes that the complexity of living things and all of their functioning parts hints at the role of an unspecified source of intelligence in their creation (Orr). For all intents and purposes, the evidence cited by I.D. supporters consists only of the holes or missing links in evolutionary theory; it is a widely-debate proposal, not because ?of the significant weight of its evidence,? but because ?of the implications of its evidence? (IDnet).
The Scopes Monkey Trial was a beginning of independent thought throughout the country. After the trial, it stayed on the books until a 1967 Supreme Court Case overturned the Butler Act and declared it unconstitutional. In the end, evolution can finally be taught; students can examine the research that Charles Darwin did and understand why Darwin came to his belief in evolution. People can study this and decide for themselves.
simple terms: either Darwin or the Bible was true.” (265) The road to the trial began when Tennessee passed the Butler Act in 1925 banning the teaching of evolution in secondary schools. It was only a matter of time before a young biology teacher, John T. Scopes, prompted by the ACLU, tested the law. Spectators and newspapermen came from all over to witness whether science or religion would win the day. Yet, below all the hype, the trial had a deeper meaning.
In the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” by Lorraine Hansberry there are two main character’s that many people debate upon to be the protagonist of the play. Those two characters are Mama and Walter. The story is about an African American family living in Chicago in the 1950’s. During this time period race was a large issue in that area. The family consists of three generations, Mama being the mother and grandmother has a lot of responsibilities as what I see her to be as the families anchor. The next generation is Walter his wife Ruth and his sister Beneatha. Walter and Ruth have a song Travis who is ten years old at the time of this play. Mama is the moral supporter of the family and believes that everything has a purpose and that things should be done by design. One of the main events in this play is the life insurance settlement check for ten thousand dollars that Mama receives. This being a large amount of money during that time period creates many arguments between the families about what to do with the money. Walter is the type of guy that believes his family shouldn’t settle like everyone else and believes that they shouldn’t be held back just because they are an African American family living in what is referred to as a “white man’s world”. I believe that Walter is the protagonist of the play for two main reasons, he isn’t a selfish man, he doesn’t feel the family should be limited because they are African American and he has distinct options or plans for the future of his family.
The 1920’s were a time of change. New ideas were becoming more readily experimented with and even accepted by large portions of the population. Some of these included jazz music and the fight against the alcoholic prohibition. The radical idea I will focus on in this paper, however, is Evolution. It is a theory that had been around for over half a century before the 20’s but had only more recently caught on in the US. It contradicted the Christian theory of Divine Creation as described in the Bible. This caused many religious fundamentalists to fight against it. They took their battle to the law books, and they were challenged by pro-evolution modernists in the Scopes "Monkey Trial" of 1925.
John Thomas Scopes, a math teacher and football coach for Rhea County High School in Dayton, Tennessee, was pressured into taking the challenge by a friend, George Rappleyea, who saw the advertisement. With the school’s biology teacher out for the last two weeks of class, Scopes took over and began teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution. Soon after, he was arrested and charged with a violation of the Butler Act. Contrary to popular understanding, the worst punishment for this crime was a small fine.
In her story Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Harriet Jacobs presents what life was like living as a female slave during the 19th century. Born into slavery, she exhibits, to people living in the North who thought slaves were treated fairly and well, how living as a slave, especially as a female slave during that time, was a heinous and horrible experience. Perhaps even harder than it was if one had been a male slave, as female slaves had to deal with issues, such as unwanted sexual attention, sexual victimization and for some the suffering of being separated from their children. Harriet Jacobs shows that despite all of the hardship that she struggled with, having a cause to fight for, that is trying to get your children a better life
The argument of whether or not humans evolved from monkeys is constantly tossed around in our society with the emergence of more and more scientific discoveries. Evolution across such a broad spectrum is known as macroevolution, or changes that happen at or above the species level. Both popular and academic discourses debate the religious and moral issues associated with macroevolution and its propositions. The main person behind the idea of evolution was Charles Darwin who theorized that everything comes from a common ancestor. In the magazine article “Was Darwin Wrong?” featured in a 2004 issue of National Geographic, David Quammen discusses whether or not Darwin’s findings in evolution theory were correct. This article was targeted for
Since the Age of the Enlightenment, the institution of religion has had to contend with the opposition of science regarding the issues of the origins of the world and of the human species. Up until around the end of the 17th century, the church was the authority on how the world and everything in it had come to be. However, with the great intellectual revolution came thinkers such as Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and many others who challenged the biblical assumptions with empirically deduced scientific theories. The Catholic Church had a nasty habit of persecuting such ideological dissent toward creationism, calling it heresy and thereby somewhat suppressing a complete upheaval of the Scriptures. For many centuries to come, the scientific research grew and developed into theories like the Big Bang and evolution, though primarily in places where such progress was tolerated. The state of Tennessee in 1925 was not such a place. In the town of Dayton in Tennessee, a high school biology teacher was found to be in violation of a recently passed law, the Butler Act, because he taught the theory of evolution in his classroom. The debate that ensued has yet to be resolved, what with the modification of creationism into the theory of intelligent design. The argument in favor of creationism was solely based in scripture, though it had to be changed in light of its revamping, whereas the argument for evolution has only been strengthened by continued scientific discoveries.
Since the time that teaching evolution in public schools was banned as heresy and taboo for contradicting the Bible, most public school systems today take an opposite approach in which creationism is seldom ta...
In the uncertainty that the modern world is, there is one law that stays petrified in stone no matter what happens: “Things change with age.” No matter if it is in history, science, or even Pokémon, things change as time passes by and this process is called evolution. The theory formulated by Charles Darwin is the belief that all organisms have come from earliest creatures because of external factors (“NSTA…”). School boards everywhere have accepted the theory of Evolution as fact making it essential to be in the curriculums of science classrooms. However, over the years, controversy has arisen as the fact that is evolution is still only a theory with flaws and setbacks, efficiently making other theories (i.e. intelligent design) a viable alternate in the classroom. The law, on the other hand, had a different idea about these other theories with numerous bans them from schools, claiming them to be against the second amendment. Despite the bitter debate of rather or not it is valid and right for teaching (primarily alone) the theory of evolution lies as being the most reliable and accurate way to teach how the modern world came to be.
In “The Trial of Girlhood” and “A Perilous Passage In the Slave Girl’s Life” Jacobs’s narrative emphasizes the problems that are faced by female slaves. She shares the sexual abuses that are commonly practiced by slave master against young female slaves. She does this through revealing the unique humiliation and the brutalities that were inflicted upon young slave girls. In this narrative we come to understand the psychological damage caused by sexual harassment. We also realize how this sexual harassment done by the slaveholders went against morality and “violated the most sacred commandment of nature,”(Harriet 289)as well as fundamental religious beliefs.