Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Does religion affects literature
The value of tradition
The value of tradition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Does religion affects literature
Comparing Half Caste and Search for my Tongue
Culture. It’s a very complicated term, with many different
interpretations, but what does it actually mean? In this essay I will
compare two poems from completely different cultures to see if we get
any comparisons, the poems I have chosen to write about are Half-Caste
by John Agard and Search for my Tongue by Sujata Bhatt, I have chosen
these because I feel they raise some very significant points. But back
to the question mentioned earlier, what is culture? Everyone has a
different view on culture, but to me it is a huge influence on our
everyday lives, many different issues contribute to the term ‘Culture’
from the way we dress, to our beliefs, attributes, how we live, and
even what we eat. It affects us all differently depending on how we
understand it, for example, if we were to believe that culture was
just a religious matter we would only be affected by what that
religion tells us, whereas if we were to believe that culture was a
whole way of life we would be affected in a completely different way.
Culture is important to us all, regardless of how we feel about it, it
gives us a guide to our lives and shows us some boundaries; it can
also give us advice and help us to be a better person. The word
‘different’ can be used in two contexts; we can say it both
complimentarily and offensively, my understanding of this is that some
people are afraid of what’s different and therefore have to make
comments to feel safe. But when we say ‘different’ cultures we are
referring to the way other people live, and if we are afraid of this
we must all seriously reconsider ourselves.
As I have already mentioned one of the poems I will be studying is
Half-Caste by John ...
... middle of paper ...
... the end of the poem though she
seems to have won the fight.
In conclusion, everyone looks upon culture differently; there are
those who take it seriously and those that don’t. But whether or not
we like it we are all part of a culture and should therefore respect
other’s. Of course culture can be seen as something to fight with,
there are so many people in the world with different views it would be
surprising if it wasn’t! In my opinion both authors use language as
something to fight with and against in their own unique ways. Both of
these poems use some sort of violence to get a message across, this to
me is a type of fighting, so the answer to my question is ‘YES’ we
could see culture as something to fight with or against because of the
language both poems use, for instance the taunting that John Agard
uses and the metaphors that Sujata Bhatt uses.
Daily life was influenced in both Ancient India as well as in Ancient China by religion and philosophies. Their caste system, their beliefs, and their well being affected the religion and philosophies.
Berkhoffer, Robert F., The White Man’s Indian, 1978, Random House, Inc., New York, 261, nonfiction.
between the two is more than a fight in order to win the case - it is
not do as much as that. I neither run nor fight, but do meanly stand, answering each heavy
Encountering struggles in life defines one’s character and speaks volumes about their strength, ambition, and flexibility. Through struggles, sacrifice, and tragedy, Junior in The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, by Sherman Alexie, adapts to survive difficult situations and faces his problems head-on. As he makes life changing decisions, adapts to an unfamiliar culture, and finds himself amongst misery and heartbreak, Junior demonstrates resilience to overcome adversity and struggles.
One of the hardest realities of being a minority is that the majority has a thousand ways to hurt anyone who is part of a minority, and they have but two or three ways to defend themselves. In Sherman Alexie’s short story The Toughest Indian in the World, Roman Gabriel Fury is a member of the Native American minority that makes up less than two percent of the total United States population (1.2 percent to be exact). This inherent disadvantage of being a minority, along with various cultural factors, influences the conflicted character of Roman Gabriel Fury and his attitudes toward the white majority. Through his use of strong language, demanding tone, and vibrant colors, Roman Gabriel Fury is able to reveal his complex feelings about growing up Indian in a predominately white world.
Do you believe violence is rooted into human nature?
In ‘Presents From My Aunts in Pakistan' and 'Half Caste', the poets Moniza Alvi and John Agard uses first person narrative to protest and express their feeling of not belonging to a place. It describes their feelings of being recognized as having no fixed nationality by demanding answers. Present for my aunts in Pakistan talks about receiving gifts from her Pakistani aunt and asking questions on whether she belongs in Pakistan or England. She thinks she does not fit in the Pakistan clothes her aunt sent her, but neither does she with denim. Half-Caste is about the speaker asking someone to explain what they mean for calling him Half-Caste. It describes some events that are utilized to question us. The speaker speaks in a demanding tone with
Conflict is constant. It is everywhere. It exists within one’s own mind, different desires fighting for dominance. It exists outside in nature, different animals fighting for the limited resources available, and it exists in human society, in the courts. It can occur subtly, making small changes that do not register consciously, and it can occur directly and violently, the use of pure strength, whether physical, social, economic, or academic, to assert dominance and achieve one’s goals; this is the use of force. Yet, with the use of force, the user of force is destined to be one day felled by it. “He who lives by the sword will die by the sword.”
Mary Rowlandson’s “A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America” are two different perspectives based on unique experiences the narrators had with “savages.” Benjamin Franklin’s “Remarks Concerning the Savages…” is a comparison between the ways of the Indians and the ways of the Englishmen along with Franklin’s reason why the Indians should not be defined as savages. “A Narrative of the Captivity…” is a written test of faith about a brutally traumatic experience that a woman faced alone while being held captive by Indians. Mary Rowlandson views the Indians in a negative light due to the traumatizing and inhumane experiences she went through namely, their actions and the way in which they lived went against the religious code to which she is used; contrastingly, Benjamin Franklin sees the Indians as everything but savages-- he believes that they are perfect due to their educated ways and virtuous conduct.
This stage of my adolescent life was very memorable. This was the time when my life was becoming more complicated as I struggled to find my own racial identity, and constantly questioning myself, “Who am I?” “Where do I belong?” while facing the pressure of “fitting in” as a biracial teen in prejudicial Asian society.
Prior to encountering the works Indian Pride: Myths and Truths, Indian Pride: Treaties and Sovereignty, and The Sundance Ceremony, I had speculated that Fools Crow exaggerated Native American customs and traditions in order to create a more compelling novel. Yet, after analyzing these works, I found that I was completely wrong. As Linda Smith states in Decolonizing Methodologies: “It galls us that Western researchers and intellectuals can assume to know all there is to know of us, on the basis of their brief encounters with some of us,” I had unjustly assumed I knew it all (1). Despite various attempts at altering the Native American identity, these three works help to “dispel Indian myths with the real truth” (Indian Pride: Myths and Truths).
It is not a matter of “if” it is a matter of “when.” People fight over little things, like a photo of a field trip in 3rd grade, and over big things like the liberty of a nation or people. People fight for many reasons, they think the cause is just, or they are too stubborn or too prideful to betray their morals and ideals. Some trick the enemy and gain the advantage for themselves and their side of the battle, some fight valiantly for their cause to the bitter end. Of all these topics, what drives and motivates people is the most difficult to describe, as what motivates one person to act may scare another into silence. People’s mentalities differ from person to person, and no one statement describes why certain people fight and others cower in silence and allow the enemy to trample them and their opinions. These are the people that do not realize that anything that can be fought over is worth fighting over; no one person or group has the moral right to spread their views over the entire world. So fight, and never give up, moral integrity is essential and you must defend
Conflict is always present in human interactions. A conflict is not always a negative thing. Sometimes if it is handled properly, it will result in broadening one’s mind or giving one a chance to grow and change. On the other hand, if people were
I have to remind myself that aggressive behavior is not always based on winning. While I may view this as doing so in my best interest, I have to remember others rights, needs, feelings, and desires of those around me. When I take the aggressive behavior approach, I may end up having to get what I get.