Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of two paintings
Compare and contrast art works
Comparison of two paintings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of two paintings
The following essay is about comparing two different artists with two different period/styles and how the idea of painting nudes was treated differently throughout the years. First, I would introduce the artwork along with their artist. Secondly, I will be comparing the subject matters between the two artworks and lastly, I will be concluding my comparison and the answer I gotten from writing and researching for the essay.
I picked Giorgione/ Titian’s Le Concert Champêtre and Édouard Manet’s Le Dejeuner sur l’Herbe because of how similar these two artworks are but at the same, it was treated differently due to the different period that were created. Giorgione or even Titian’s painting was more ‘accepted’ than Manet’s painting in his early days, as more ‘rules’ was set in his period and resulting in Manet being
…show more content…
Unlike Giorgione/ Titian’s Le Concert Champêtre that was describe with sentences like “…The search for balance is shown through the integration of these figures in a setting where man and nature must coexist in perfect harmony” , Manet’s Luncheon on the Grass was rejected by the salon of Paris because of the nude woman in the painting. Manet was also paying a tribute to Giorgione/ Titian’s Le Concert Champêtre by painting a similar composition.
Starting from the bottom left side, there’s blue dress and a lady cap that was set aside with the basket of food. Towards the middle, the naked woman sat on a blue cloth with her eyes stared directly out of frame as if she is staring at the audience. Accompany her are two well-dressed man having a conversation and behind them is another woman reaching into the pond to retrieve something. The background was dark as it was covered by the trees, creating a ‘cool’ like
In the Florence and the early renaissance, we have the greatest master of art like Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Sandro Botticelli and others. In this period of time the painters almost never show their emotions or feelings, they were more focused on indulging the churches and the wealthy people. In The renaissance period the art provides the work of art with ideal, intangible qualities, giving it a beauty and significance greater and more permanent than that actually found in the modern art. Florence and the early renaissance, the art become very valued where every artist was trying to create art forms consistent with the appearance of the beauty or elegance in a natural perspective. However, Renaissance art seems to focus more on the human as an individual, while Wayne White art takes a broader picture with no humans whatsoever; Wayne, modern three dimensional arts often utilizes a style of painting more abstract than Renaissance art. At this point in the semester these two aspects of abstract painting and the early renaissance artwork have significant roles in the paintings. Wayne White brings unrealistic concepts that provoke a new theme of art, but nevertheless the artistic creations of the piece of art during early renaissance still represent the highest of attainment in the history of
Luncheon on the grass created an enormous amount of negativity and Manet's painting Olympia put the icing on the cake. Due to its brazen nudity it was labeled as being obscenely vulgar. Although It was painted in 1863 it was submitted and had its first showing in 1865 at the Salon. The image is of a modern French prostitute. The actual name of the lady posing is not Olympia it is Victorine Meurent. Manet used her in other paintings of his including Luncheon on the grass. The two paintings were an extremely radical break away from Academic art. People thought of them as outrageously scandalous. Manet based Olympia on Titian's Venus of Urbino painted in 1538. Of the two it's plain to see their similarities and their differences. For instance, the way they are laying is exactly
Male artists were the only people who were producing art at that time, with women being their preferred subject matter. Because of this, it was easy to identify that the portrayal of women in these works was actually how men perceived women to be in reality. The art produced reflects the dominant patriarchal values formed in Europe in this era. The binary opposition evident in the artwork was a reflection of the male
For my assignment, I will be comparing the two pieces of art titled Louis XIV painted by Hyacinthe Rigaud and Portrait of Marie Antoinette With Her Children by Marie-Louise-Elisabeth Vigee-Lebrun. I will be analyzing and breaking down the different techniques used in both paintings and explaining the similarities between them as well. Though the paintings contain the same family throughout both, there is a clear imbalance in power and something very normal for this time period. I will be elaborating on the difference in social status between the two paintings, even though they are the same family.
I chose to analyze the The Family, 1941 portray and The Family, 1975 portray, both from Romare Bearden, for this essay because they are very similar paintings but at the same time very different. To write a critical analyzes it was necessary to choose two different paintings that had similar characteristics. The text about critical comparison said that to compare things they have to be similar, yet different, and that’s what these paintings look to me. As I had already written an analysis of The Family, 1941 portray I chose to analyze and compare The Family, 1975 this time. Both works have a lot of color in it and through the people’s faces in the pictures we can feel the different emotions that the paintings are conveying.
Prior to the 20th century, female artists were the minority members of the art world (Montfort). They lacked formal training and therefore were not taken seriously. If they did paint, it was generally assumed they had a relative who was a relatively well known male painter. Women usually worked with still lifes and miniatures which were the “lowest” in the hierarchy of genres, bible scenes, history, and mythological paintings being at the top (Montfort). To be able to paint the more respected genres, one had to have experience studying anatomy and drawing the male nude, both activities considered t...
The Renaissance Period is widely known for the abundance of amazing portraiture that circulated around Europe. During the Renaissance, Albrecht Dürer, a German artist painted a self-portrait in 1500 that had qualities that differed from the usual style of artist in that time (Chauhan). Jean Clouet also painted a portrait for the King of France and became the official court painter. Both artists had a talent for portraiture, while their styles were quite different. King Francis I wanted to be seen as a powerful man, and appointed Clouet to paint him in a classically renaissance way that highlights his wealth and authority. Dürer, described as a cocky, self-centered man, painted himself in a light that is unique and puts him on a ‘holy’ pedestal (Stokstad 356). In this essay I will show how although both paintings have clear differences with their style, both men in the compositions are conveyed in a great and very powerful sense.
The shift between the Middle Ages and Renaissance was documented in art for future generations. It is because of the changes in art during this time that art historians today understand the historical placement and the socio-economic, political, and religious changes of the time. Art is a visual interpretation of one’s beliefs and way of life; it is through the art from these periods that we today understand exactly what was taking place and why it was happening. These shifts did not happen overnight, but instead changed gradually though years and years of art, and it is through them that we have record of some of the most important changes of historic times.
The renaissance art was very different from the medieval art since the renaissance art brought back the human interest of art. I have always found to be surprising that some of the most famous artwork is of naked humans. I also find to be strange as well. Since there are so many things paint or to make sculptures about, this makes me wonders why would artist pick humans and especially naked humans? Sure humans are an interesting thing to make or paint about, however, why not do something of a kingdom, a war, a battle, and even an animal. There are so many things that artist can make, but why to make the focus of the renaissance art of naked humans. However, many tourists around the world will visit these famous these masterpieces work when they are visiting the countries they were created. For instance, the statue of David, which is located in Florence, Italy, was created during the renaissance and it was one of Michelangelo finest work. I have had the pleasure of being able to see the fascinating sculpture in person. At first, I thought it was no big deal. However, when I actually saw for the first time in person my reaction was just. “Wow… I never see anything like. It was incredible”. I also asked myself, “How did he do that? What gave him the inspiration to create such a sculpture? How has it stayed up this long?” I was impressed and usually, I am not impressed by art. It was just
In order to familiarise myself with the above topic, I have invested much time reading vast selection of the portraiture art themes with aim to get acquainted with the knowledge and the language used in this particular subject. It was very challenging and entertaining to read comprehensive range of various critiques and analysis of the world best paintings stretching from ancient classic to contemporary western image. Developing understanding of the diverse art expressions and social and political influences tha...
Edouard Manet, often considered one of the founders of modern art, certainly challenged the norm and incited thought through his paintings and sketches. His works challenged social norms and were critical of politics. As we look at his art today it is hard to see how his work is controversial. The images within his paintings that seem little more than after thought, would have shocked and appalled people of the mid 19th century. However, with a little more knowledge pertaining to the meaning of the imagery, and how it would be perceived at the time, it is a wonder that Manet died of natural causes rather than riot or execution. He deliberately used images from famous paintings and applied them in ways that would either draw parallels to the original work or contradict it completely. Manet also used techniques to involve his audience in the painting, essentially extending the work beyond the canvas. The Execution of Emperor Maximilian is no exception to any of these rules.
The Italian Renaissance and the Baroque era are two major periods in art history, some of the types of art in those periods were painting, sculpting, and architecture. During these periods, many artist gained enormous fame from creating wonderful pieces of work that represented their beliefs and artistic thinking. This essay will analyze and evaluate two pieces from those major art periods. Rembrandt 's painting The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp and the sculpture David, by Michelangelo. These two masterpieces shed light of their significance in art history. David represents the Italian Renaissance for it being a strong symbol of the new republic, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp depicts the focus on human progression.
Additionally, the styles changed; from Rococo, which was meant to represent the aristocratic power and the “style that (…) and ignored the lower classes” (Cullen), to Neoclassicism, which had a special emphasis on the Roman civilization’s virtues, and also to Romanticism, which performs a celebration of the individual and of freedom. Obviously, also the subject matter that inspired the paintings has changed as wel...
Since the first prehistoric cave painting, and perhaps much before that, the human race has always used art as a form of expression. With the passing of each historical period came new technologies and techniques and were all influenced by the unique style, characteristics, and social conditions of those periods. Even though, each period discovered new forms and unique styles of art most historical periods were influenced by an earlier period of history. In this essay, I will explore the relationship, style, and influences of the Renaissance and Baroque periods and will also compare and contrast a work of art from both periods to further explain the relationship between the two eras.
To you this feels almost as if the sunlight is coming from beside, you as well as in front of you, and in part creating shadows in every direction. Once again, you observe that the leaves on the trees also contain shadows of the leaves surrounding them. You notice that the shadows do not create complete blackness, but that they are still in the tones of greens, browns, and greys. The color is just desaturated or more muted. Suddenly, you notice that the intensity of sunlight is highest at the top of the trees, in the middle you notice a more neutral color tone is formed and at the bottom the color of the tree becomes more muted and greyed out. To you this highlights how the sun and its light projects from high above the trees showing the relationship between the position of the light source and the effect it has on the surface it touches. You found this observation was similar to the grass noticing that you observed three distinct colors within the grass as well: green, light green and, yellow. Overall, you found that the park contained areas of concentrated light and dense shadow which created high contrast and layers of color