Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of perception
Comparing Constructivist and Direct Theories of Visual Perception
Two of the main theories of visual perception are constructivist and
direct. Gregory is associated with the constructivist theory, while
Gibson supports the direct theory. The both theories differ in their
explanation of perception, however there are some aspects that relate
them.
Gregory's theory is a top down theory of perception, in the sense that
he considers prior knowledge and experience to be crucially important
in making sense of what we see. "Perception is not determined simply
by stimulus patterns. Rather, it is a dynamic searching for the best
interpretation of the available data..... which involves going beyond
the immediately given evidence of the senses." is how Gregory saw
perception in 1966. However, Gibson, with others such as Marr is
concerned with perception in every day life rather than the perception
of laboratory diagrams and other out of sort stimuli. Gibson believes
that perception is an active, direct process, which involves seeing
things in context and not in a vacuum. He referred to earlier theories
of perception as 'air' theories because they looked at the perception
of objects as if they were suspended in mid air without any
background. He argued that in real life objects do not occur like
that, and that they are always seen in a context, with a background.
Because of this Gibson referred to his theory as the ground theory.
To make sense of the various sensory inputs to the retina, the visual
system must draw on all kinds of evidence, such as distance cues,
information from other senses, and expectations based on past
experience. F...
... middle of paper ...
...ing becomes increasingly important. As put by
Neisser in 1976, in most circumstances both bottom up and top down
processes are probably needed.
Although they are similar in that they both agree that some kind of
psychological is needed to perceive and that visual perception is
mediated by light reflected from surfaces and objects. They also agree
that perception is an active process and that a perceptual experience
can be influenced by learning.
Bibliography
*Richard Gross and Rob Mcilveen, Psychology: A New Introduction,
Hodder & Stoughton, England, 1998.
*Nicky Hayes, Foundations of Psychology, Nelson Publishers, Surrey,
1996.
*Cara Flanagan, A-Level Psychology, Letts Educational Publishers,
London, 1994.
*Diana Dwyer & Jane Scampion, A-Level Psychology, Macmillan
Publishers, London, 1995.
Marr, D. (1976). Early processing of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Ser. B, 275, 483-524.
The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593
Merleau-Ponty distinguishes three aspects of the psychological process; basic sensations, perception, and the associations of memory (Merleau-Ponty, 1994). Basic sensations receive raw information from the world and transduce them for our perceptual processes. Perception unifies the infinite amount of information about our environment, from our environment, into a meaningful structure. Perception is interpretive, but its presentation of the world is as distal and objective. There are three central features of perception for Merleau-Ponty. First, perception is synthesized independently by the body and not by the mind (consciousness).
Gibson (1979) developed an ecological approach to the study of visual perception, which is a new and radical approach to the whole field of psychology that humans perceive their environment directly without mediation by cognitive process or by mental entities. According to his assertion of direct perception, there is enough information in our environment to make sense of the world (Gibson, 1977). Gibson (1979) said “direct perception is an activity of getting information from ambient array of light” (p. 147), and further called this a process of information pickup. That is, there is no need for mental processing since every object and event in the world have inherent meanings that are detected and exploited by humans. So his perception is based on information, not on sensations, which is in contrast with the conventional perspective of perception.
Sajda P. & Finkle, L.H. (1995) Intermediate Visual Representations and the Construction of Surface Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 267-291.
In this essay I will be arguing that indirect realism is the most logical and the most plausible viewpoint to hold when looking into perception over direct realism, which I will argue, has no good reason to be used as a way to perceive things. I will look into the arguments for viewpoints of perception and which one is the most convincing. These viewpoints consist of; firstly direct realism (or naïve realism) most people who have not looked into philosophy hold this view, the view that you perceive things exactly as they are with properties that they seem to have, like occupying space, being a certain size or having a certain colour. This viewpoint has a lot of problems with it and I will be outlining some of them as well as counter arguments by direct realists.
1. a. The chapter is organized in a way that it is easy to follow and comprehend. The first page entails questions that the reader should consider as they read the chapter. It then goes on to give a general concept of constructivism and into more details as you read along in the chapter.
Empiricists and rationalists have proposed opposing theories of the acquisition of knowledge, which appear unable to coexist. Each theory holds its own strengths but does not demonstrate a strong argument in itself to the questions, “Is knowledge truly possible?” and “How is true knowledge obtained?”. Immanual Kant successfully merged the two philosophies and provided a convincing argument with his theory of empirical relativism, or what some may call constructivism. His theory bridges the gap between rationalism and empiricism and proves that empiricists and rationalists each present a piece of the full puzzle. In order to truly understand Kant’s epistemology, one must first review and understand both empiricism and rationalism on an impartial basis.
Cognitive theory is concerned with the development of a person’s thought process. Cognitive theory influences how one understands and interacts with the world. Cognitive Theorist Paiget, proposed an idea that served information on the development to account for the steps and sequence of children’s intellect differently than adults. This paper will compare and contrast the 3 cognitivist theories: Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Vygotsky’s Socio Cultural Cognitive Theory and the Information Processing Approach in Kermit and the Keyboard.
There are many different Visual Perception principles in perception. The main principles are Gestalt. Gestalt is a German word meaning 'form' or 'shape'. Gestalt psychologists formulated a series of principles that describe how t...
(2004) Psychology (2nd European edition). Essex: Pearson Education Limited Gross, R (1996).Psychology, The Science of mind and behaviour (3rd Ed). London: Hodder & Stoughton
Gestalt psychologists further recognized that structuralism could not explain many perceptual phenomena. In response, they proposed that perception is based on the organization of stimuli into holistic and meaningful forms. They are well-known for the phrase "the whole is different than the sum of its parts." They proposed several "laws" (really heuristics or "rules of thumb") that are referred to as the Gestalt laws of perceptual organization. These are discussed in the module later on.
Perception is defined as the awareness of the world through the use of the five senses, but the concept of perception is often used to isolate one person’s point of view, so how reliable can perception be if no one person’s is exactly the same? The word perception itself is riddled with different, well, perceptions of its meaning. When some hear the word, they might automatically think of it as something innately flawed, that can easily be fooled by illusions, while others may think of its usefulness when avoiding scalding a hand on a hot stove. I am here to agree with both and to argue that perception is something necessary and helpful, and something that should be scrutinized for its flaws. By looking at perception as a way of knowing in the context of memory and human sciences, it can be concluded that perception can contribute to the acquisition of knowledge by constructing a foundation on which incoming stimuli from the environment are able to be quickly interpreted and acted upon, but perception can also hinder the acquisition of knowledge by wrongly interpreting those stimuli, causing inappropriate reactions.
Constructivism has been a popular term used in education since the 1990s but can be traced back to a much earlier time than that (Maddux & Cummings, 1999, p.8). Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky are the two theorists who are closely linked to the development of constructivism. Over the past decade, education has seen an alarming increase in the number of students who are qualifying for special education services as well as students who are being labeled as “at risk” students. Having such an increase in special education the demand to find a teaching style that works best for students with disabilities has become extremely popular. An increase in popular terms and trendy forms of teaching instruction has developed in education. A popular “buzz” word that has invaded the educational world is Constructivism; even though constructivism is not a new term it does lack a concrete definition.
Experiential approach to learning can be an extremely effective form of learning, especially for adults. Confucius said “Tell me, and I will forget. Show me and I may remember” and that saying still applies to today as many adults learn better by experience than they do by the traditional chalk and talk (Conlan, Grabowski & Smith, 2012). The following essay will discuss how to utilize experiential learning in a heavy equipment construction company. It will illustrate how to facilitate student employee learning by doing.