Comparing Brutus And Watergate Scandal In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

880 Words2 Pages

Julius Caesar is a play by Shakespeare. Caesar's tragic death is due to the conspirators who plotted against him. They convinced one of Caesar’s friends, Brutus, to join their plan under the guise of stopping him from gaining too much power. Brutus attempted to soothe the outraged Romans, but Antony induced the public to drive out the conspirators. This tragic play shares many similarities with the Watergate scandal from 1974, where President Nixon broke into the Democratic National Committee headquarters and tried to cover it up. (THESIS The themes of political corruption represented in Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar are still a prominent issue, as seen in the Watergate scandal.) Both Brutus and Nixon began as beloved public figures who …show more content…

Afraid that Caesar would become a tyrant if left in charge, Brutus decided to act before it could have happened. Brutus understood that the justification for his actions bore “no color for the thing he is” (Shakespeare 2.1.30), and the public wouldn’t think it was justified, but still chose to do it. While Brutus’ intentions could be considered noble, it does not mean that he did not mean that his actions were justified. He claimed it was for the public, while also knowing that they wouldn’t think it right. Though he claimed that he was doing it for Rome, his person thought that Caesar would be an incapable ruler definitely played a part in his decision and was why he could be so easily manipulated. Conversely, Nixon was paranoid about losing the next election, fueling the Watergate scandal. He aimed to steal files and bug telephones in the DNC headquarters in hopes that he could use what he gathered to win his next election. It was a clearly selfish reason, as he simply wanted to stay in power longer. These similarities serve as a reminder of how people in high positions are inclined to take actions that benefit themselves, even at the cost of the

Open Document