Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Odour Of Chrysanthemus Essay
Arguments that can be made about the odour of chrysanthemums
Arguments that can be made about the odour of chrysanthemums
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Odour Of Chrysanthemus Essay
Compare Passage A, which is a transcript in which a women working in a
pub, talks about the different managers she has worked under, and passage
B, which is an extract from, Odour of Chrysanthemums, a short story by
D H Lawrence.
Upon reading both passages I can clearly view numerous comparisons and
differences. Initially, the subject, (meaning of the text) is
extremely different in both extracts. Passage A is a transcript in
which a women working in a pub, talks about the different managers she
has worked under. Whereas passage B, is an extract from, "Odour of
Chrysanthemums", a short story by D H Lawrence, set in the midlands.
The passage describes how Elizabeth Bates seeks help from her
neighbors one evening, when her husband fails to return home after
work.
The purpose of the two passages are also extremely diverse, passage A
is a transcript, and basically she is informing a group of people or a
fellow colleague about her previous managers in comparison to the
manager she works under now. For instance she informs the other by
telling her how she can get away with things while under her temporary
manager, 'were all walking around with four lighted cigarettes in our
hand and having a drink off everyone that gives us one. The second
passage is there to entertain a particular group of people interested
in D H Lawrence's writing. The use of descriptive writing engages the
audience brains, in-order for them to carry on reading, 'He stood
perplexed'.
The audience in passage A is very informal, I believe that she is
having a general chat with a fellow worker, because the level of
speech is quite informal, 'that's the main thing like isn't it you
know', I feel that it is interpersonal, the speaker and listener are
in close proximity. While extract B, in my opinion will have an
endless audience, because it can be seen over thousands of miles and
thousands of years. I believe that the audience will benefit a
particular age group, quite elderly people, who understand the
particular dialect used.
The genre itself is very different as well; principally passage A is a
simple review of past and present mangers in which the worker has come
across. Whereas on the other hand passage B is a suspenseful story,
basically a thriller. You can identify this because of the language
used throughout the text. "I don't like leaving the children in bed,
and nobody in the house," she said. From this you notice that
something eventful has occurred in which has permitted her to leave
her children at home by them selves.
While the authors’ plot structure may have been similar, their rhetorical structure is far from comparable. Fisher uses more of a discursive structure, in which she is very frank and sarcastic. She casually speaks of “undesirables throng[ing] the narrow alleys, and sisters of scarlet sit[ting] in the doorways” (Fisher 23) which gives her passage the effect of being an overly sarcastic fabliau which can be found in any editorial page of a newspaper.
Her attention to the most miniscule detail and her grand explanations of spaces impacts her writing style and her reader’s reactions. This particularity is seen in this example: “I woke to a room of sunshine. A wispy-thin curtain veiled a multi paned sliding door of glass...The windows needed washing but slid easily apart and I stepped out onto a tilted balcony, a string mop on a hook to the left of me, and a half-missing board where I had planned to put my right foot. The breath went out of me...About 200 feet below was the sea… (151).” The authors account of this event could have been dull and simple as “There was a hole in the floor of the balcony”, but instead she chose to use detail and descriptors to engage the reader to imagine seeing the strange hotel room that almost turned her relaxing morning into a 200 foot
In 2011, Donna Hicks wrote her book Dignity: The Essential Role It Plays in Resolving Conflict. Hicks’ Ph.D. in educational psychology and twenty years of experience in international conflict resolution allowed her to write this text about psychological injuries to a person 's sense of self-worth. In her text, Donna Hicks discusses the damaging effects a negative authoritative figure could have, especially on young children and their dignity. Also mentioned is how impressionable children can be and how those impressions can follow them into adulthood. The author’s intended audience appears to be anyone interested in remedying their psychological injuries and improving their sense of self-appreciation. Hicks’ reasoning for composing this text
After this obstacle in her life, Mary must decide whether to return to the husband she despises or follow the man she loves. Wollstonecraft expresses: “one moment she was a heroine, half-determined to bear whatever fate should inflict; the next, her mind would recoil – and tenderness possessed her whole soul” (1788: 46). Provided that Mary must now make important decisions in her life, she demonstrates that she is evolving into an independent woman. She has developed from being a sentimental eighteenth-century woman, which Wollstonecraft portrays in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, to speaking what she believes is true. She now incarnates the type of woman the feminist Wollstonecraft truly wants to characterize in her fiction. In other
To begin with, Twyla's and Roberta's race is quite complicated to evaluate. Morrison does not inform the reader about either of the characters race, which keeps the reader more intrigued. The author does state that Twyla and Roberta are like salt and pepper next to each other, therefore though out the story, one tries to figure out which one is which by the clues given in the story. Additionally, when one is trying to figure out these two characters races, one realizes their own stereotypes. For instance, from what they eat, to where they live, to their names, and their personality, it makes one realize that just because one character eats chicken or lives in the suburbs, it does not necessarily make them a certain race, because any race can
In the book Brief Interviews With Hideous Men, the author writes a set of 23 individual short stories totally set apart from each other in their own right. The stories stem from the lengths of a half-page to lengths of almost 30 pages. In these short stories, the plot ranges from a female individual who is in a deep, depressed state to a female individual who worries and is paranoid that her sexual practices do not please her lover. Mixed into these short stories are separate pieces of an interviewer, a female individual whose identity is never revealed, listening to the responses to her questions that are also never revealed, from a numerous set of men, each completely different from one another with the stories that they tell her. It is always the man who starts off the conversation, and the interviewer's response and question is identified as "Q." I believe the author, David Foster Wallace, intentionally made these series of short stories completely different from each other. The structure of the book, the author's choice to not include the interviewer's questions, and the organization of the individual short stories emphasize a meaninglessness and randomness in the lives of the hideous men.
Throughout my junior year in English III each assignment I was assigned to do had multiple improvements in every different assignment. I have improved on my writing skills drastically on the some of the English devices I lacked in.
“One day the kid wrote on the blackboard: “I see the ball.” And the old man studied it awhile and said, slowly, gingerly: “I ... see ... the … ball.” Maniac whooped, “ You’re reading!” “I'm reading!” Yipped the old man.His smile was so wide he’d have to break it into sections to fit it through the doorway.
On "The Narrow Bridge of Art", Woolf states that the emotions people produce are answers to those new challenges which overflow from the writers' minds. These answers are not only given by the dialogues (sometimes monologues) that a person can catch in moments of solemn contemplation, but also by the different gamut of images which are able to produce a profound bewilderment. That is why in "Kew Gardens" not all the characters have a thread easily to be followed in their dialogues, as the one of the two elderly women of low middle class. Sometimes coherent words are not needed; just the essence of a human being is required for emotions to be trembled. These images are not only children of an overwhelmed magic; horror and traumatized depression, just to mention a few, are also living existences of this world of muses which caught the writer's soul as easily as flies are caught in spider webs. As Woolf writes, "It is a spring night, the moon is up, the nightingale singing, the willows bending over the river. Yes, but at the same time a diseased old woman is picking over her greasy rags on a hideous iron bench" (16). The two old ladies from "Kew Gardens" are not Boticelli's Graces, but they are immersed in the path towards writing, they are as dignified as Minerva's bust to be considered as a source for inspiration for an artistic manifestation to be created; they also have their own story to tell and to be told.
Mrs. Woolf begins her memoir in an easygoing, conversational manner by deliberately reaching out to her audience. She states in her first paragraph that she knows many different ways to write a memoir but for lack of time cannot begin to sift through them all and so she simply begins by relating her first memory. Stating that she is not deciding upon a set method and formalizing that she will be informal demonstrates a frame of mind directed outward; it is her attempt to involve the reader in her work. The sympathetic reader feels as if he and Woolf are chatting about her life over a cup of tea. After narrating her first memory she returns to the structure of her memoir, explaining that she could never really succeed in conveying the feelings represented by her first memory without first describing herself. She notes: "Here I come to one of the memoir writer's difficulties – one of the reason...
Mary Rowlandson’s narrative has a lot of contradicting statements dealing with the debate of rather or not Rowlandson is expressing herself as a puritan or an individualist. There is evidence in the narrative that can be argued for either side. However, the fifth remove shows evidence for the side that believes Rowlandson did not write this as a pure puritan. The fifth remove shows that she wrote this as an individualist giving God some credit while also subtly acknowledging the fact that she had a major hand in her own survival.
Throughout history, society has been predominately patriarchal. The male is seen as the primary authority figure. This system is often displayed in many family structures and there is nothing wrong with patriarchy; however when it leads to kyriarchy, it becomes an issue. Women, past and present, are often viewed as second rate citizens. Over half the work force around the world consists of women and yet they are paid 77 cents to a dollar of what a man earns (Shane). Women have a voice and deserve to be heard. When analyzing works such as “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemmingway, the poem “Stations” by Audre Lorde, and “Sweat” by Zora Neale Hurston, one can observe the common theme of women finding their voice, discovering strength and standing up for what’s right.
The concept of feminism is defined as “political, economic, and social equality of the sexes” (Merriam-Webster). Contrary to prior belief, it is not raising women above men. This was a fear held by many men in the nineteenth century. Therefore, Hawthorne was restricted in how he made the characters of The Scarlet Letter powerful within the society by what society feared. Throughout the novel, Nathaniel Hawthorne attempts to write a novel that is ahead of its time by showing feminist tendencies through Hester, however the constraints of his society and that of Puritan society force his writing to portray women in a negative light.
living, I’ve decided to select two pieces by each writer and interpret how each writer
The feeling of not being heard or not being allowed to do what you want is placed upon women in the 1930s. Harper Lee’s depiction of women, in her novel To Kill A Mockingbird, is they should be able to have an important voice in society, make changes they feel are important, and do certain actions without conforming to gender normalities.