In a time of national healthcare reform and financial uncertainty it is imperative that healthcare leaders use resources effectively by investing in human capital management to reduce costs and increase the quality and safety of patient care to prevent ‘never events,” such as pressure ulcers, surgical site infections, vascular-catheter associated infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, administration of incompatible blood, and falls (Institute of Medicine 2001). However, this requires the development of high performing teams that can deliver safe, effective, efficient, timely and equitable, patient-centered care.
Leaders are expected to lead and followers expected to follow- but are the two really that different? Not really.
…show more content…
These styles are polar opposites and span cultural and organizational boundaries. At some point in their career a leader may exhibit both transformational and transactional leadership characteristics with some combination of both enhancing effective leadership. Transactional leaders are task and outcome oriented using strategies and behaviors of self-monitoring, reward and punishment to achieve goals, and the organizational culture is built on rules-oriented traditions. While this style can be effective in some situations, it is generally considered ineffective and may prevent both leaders and followers from achieving their full potential in behavioral health setting (Aaron, 2006). In Contrast, transformational leadership (TL) is associated with the Leader/Member Exchange theory (LMX) and looks at the relationship between leader and follower in an organization. The behaviors associated with TL are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, which focuses on mentoring employees and building supportive relationships making it an effective leadership approach accepted by followers. The culture of the organization is reflection of the ambitions of the transformational leader. This relationship leads to increased job performance, organizational commitment, employee satisfaction and organizational
...selbein and Cohen, “organizations that take the time to teach leadership are far ahead of the competition. By becoming familiar with the transformational leadership approach and combining the four I's, managers can become effective leaders in the business world.” (1999, p. 263). Transformational leadership can be applied in one-on-one or group situations. Using this approach, the manager (leader) and the associates (followers) are “transformed” to enhance job performance and help the organization be more productive and successful. All of these leaders have the attributes mentioned here. History will decide the greater impact they had on society as it is being written every day. Therefore, the qualities of transformational leadership make the essence of transformational management and the key to successful management of transformational organizational changes.
The concept of transformational leadership relies on appropriate leadership approaches for mission success. AFDD 1-1 describes three leadership competencies: person, people/team, organization Effective leaders (tactical level) need to build face-to-face and interpersonal relationships that directly influence behavior and values. Effective leaders (operational level) need to build team dynamics for small groups and squadrons. Effective leaders (strategic level) need to build strategy and provide direction in a broad spectrum.
It is concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards, and long-term goals. It motivates a form of intelligence that moves followers to accomplish more of what is expected of them. (Northouse, 2016, pg.161). Transformational leadership can be used to influence people on a one to one level or to influence whole organizations and cultures. There’s a difference between transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Transactional leadership focuses more on leaders that uses gimmicks or promotions to get their followers to do certain things that they want. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, focuses more on connecting leaders with followers or employees to motivate and help them reach their full
This model has been used over decades in research to chime in on the importance of knowing the behavior of leader’s and their effect on those who work for them. According to Brymer and Gray (2006), effective transformational leadership ensures a supportive culture and does not require boundaries and guidance. The concept of transformational leadership was created to bring together leaders and those who work for them, which in turn impact those in whom they serve because their personality is viewed in a positive
Carter also utilized some older leadership style approaches, one being transactional. Transactional leadership focuses on the exchanges that occur between leaders and followers and at various points, his leadership could not be any more blunt at times (Northouse, 2015). Carter exchanged the ability to play with signing and obeying the contract, when the contracts were broken, he took away the ability to play. He again provided another transaction by making the grades improve to bring back the team and opportunities for the team to play, win games and tournaments.
While transactional leadership relies on a system of rewards and penalties it doesn't provide a lot of in conditions of inspiration to encourage folks to travel past the fundamentals. Given this truth the supporters of transactional leaders may get happy and develop a propensity to attain smallest expectations solely that might facilitate them avoid penalties (Bass, 1990). Therefore the leader and also the follower ar in associate conformity on what the follower would take delivery of achieving the negotiated level of performance (Bass, 1990). The success of such leadership depends on the extent of satisfaction the leader and followers have in following this technique of performance based mostly appraisals (Bass, 1990)
There are many leadership theories that play an important role in the every day workforce. Some of the theories are successful in producing a strong and productive leader, while others lack the qualities required for the job. Out of the multitude of available theories out there, I feel that the Transformational Leadership Theory is the one that stands out as being the most successful. This theory is far from coercive and instead focuses on making a satisfied team that collaborates to form a productive work environment. An environment like this, ran by a top-notch leader, is needed for success.
listens to the various viewpoints in order to be able to develop a spirit of cooperation;
Analysis of Issues After the interview with Ms. Howland, it was realized that this is not an ordinary leader. Although her function does require her to demonstrate elements of transactional leadership during the conduct of an average day in her work environment, it became obvious that there was more to her leadership style. Ms. Howland demonstrated the use of transformational leadership as a way of motivating and inspiring her team and those around her. Throughout her nine years at Crescent Point Energy, Ms. Howland has been the driving force behind many changes during the company’s evolution from a small to intermediate player in the conventional oil and gas sector. From her position within the Accounting Department, the company’s growth and her vision for the future was used to gather resources and sell a vision to upper management as well as her peers and subordinates within the corporation.
U.S. country developed the transformational leadership theory (Bass, 1985). There has been a growing interest in the intersection of leadership and ethics during the last decade. (Wren, 1998).
Bass and colleagues of his, have disputed that transactional leadership is a vital precondition if transformational leadership is to be effective (Avolio, 1999). By providing direction and focus, transactional leadership makes the use of transformational behaviors less confusing and ambiguous. From a somewhat abstract perspective, Podsakoff, Bommer and MacKenzie (2006) seem to agree with this assessment and further suggest that “leader reward and punishment behavior is the heart of what is called transactional leadership” (p.
The transformational leadership theory was deemed an appealing based on individual beliefs regarding employee-leader relationships. With a focus on communication and motivation, transformational leaders promote positive change within
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
Initially, transactional and transformational leadership are different in terms of implementation and its outcomes. However, transformational leadership was developed from transactional leadership (Downton, 1973). Bass (1985) defined transactional leadership as an exchange activity that leaders execute to motivate subordinates in order to achieve their tasks by giving out reward or punishment correspond with their performance. Additionally, active and passive management by exception are taken into account when it comes to misconception and faults. Bass (1985) stated that transformational leadership emphasizes the value of subordinates, encourages them to perform extra effort, and assures their comprehension on organization’s goals and objectives. Besides, idealised influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulatio...
Transformational leaders are needed to transform low performing organizations to acceptable to high performance. At other times, the leader is expected to move an organization from a crisis. In order to accomplish these tasks, the leader must overhaul the organization culture or subculture. This task is accomplished by nine ways of transforming others: 1. Raise others awareness. The leader makes others aware of the rewards and how to achieve them, i.e. pride in the job or financial incentives. 2. Help others look beyond self-interest. The transformational leader helps others to look at the “big picture” by describing an entire scenario, i.e. if we hire more employees to do x, we will have to make cuts in other areas. 3. Help people find self-fulfillment. The leader helps others not to focus on minor satisfactions, i.e. getting a job done before the deadline ...