Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book and film comparisons
Comparing books and movies
Book and film comparisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and film comparisons
Caleb Chadwell Professor Richey American Literature II 7 April 2018 The Great Gatsby: Film vs Novel Essay The Great Gatsby was written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1925. Highlighting the similarities and differences between the 2013 movie and the 1925 novel helps the viewer grasp details provided by both the author and producer. Each piece of work can be attributed with a great deal of interest to the audience based on their own personal preferences and unique points of view. Overall, the plot of the novel and the movie are similar, but the subtle differences in some of the most significant scenes of the movie, paint a different picture. Next, we will be looking at a few similarities between the novel and the movie. One example is the aggressive …show more content…
For example, the party scenes in the movie were given a throwback twist of today’s time period mixed with the 1920’s. Some of the music was uncharacteristic of the Roaring Twenties. You can almost hear the orchestra in the book and they are playing jazz, not the rap sounds that I heard in the movie. Nicks and Jordan’s relationship is much closer in the book than in the movie. In the novel, Daisy behaves like a loving, doting mother while introducing her daughter to Gatsby and then quickly sends her off and away her nanny. That event provided some foreshadowing as to Daisy’s true heart. Daisy seems to be innocent and perhaps even a victim in the movie until she drives over myrtle. Another difference was in Gatsby’s death. In the novel, Gatsby is floating on a pool mattress after being shot by Wilson. Contrasting this action, in the movie Gatsby is climbing out of the pool after hearing his phone ring thinking it was Daisy calling. These different versions of Gatsby’s death provide the viewer an altered image in the movie compared to the novel. Obviously, both versions of the story are very intriguing to the viewer. I much prefer the novel over the film. Fitzgerald did an amazing job with symbolism and character development in the novel that seemed shallow in the movie. Whether a person had old money or new money, it could not buy happiness in the book or the movie. Everyone involved,
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
The characters make a big difference in the movie and the book. One thing they both have in common is that Otis Amber and Berthe Erica Crow get married. And that Edgar Jennings Plum and Angela Wexler get engaged instead of Doctor Denton Deere. Also Jake Wexler is a gambler instead of being a bookie.
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
For example, in the film Nick is introduced as a recovering alcoholic and is in rehab writing about his story involving The Great Gatsby. In the novel, Nick is not introduced as an alcoholic and does not overuse it. He states at the first party in the movie, “I have been drunk just twice in my life, and the second time was that afternoon…” (Fitzgerald 29). However, in the movie we learn that Nick was someone who overused alcohol and is now in rehab writing his own stories. Another contrast between the novel and the film would be that in the novel, Gatsby tells Nick how Daisy was driving the night that Myrtle was struck and killed by Gatsby’s yellow car. Speaking to Nick, Gatsby says, “You see, when we left New York she (Daisy) was very nervous and she thought it would steady her to drive-- and this woman rushed out at us just as we were passing a car coming along the other way. It all happened in a minute...first Daisy turned away from the woman toward the other car, and then she lost her nerve and turned back. The second my hand hit the wheel I felt the shock..” (Fitzgerald 143-144). However, in the film the split second on the screen shows Gatsby driving the car as Myrtle was killed. These are two major differences between the novel and the
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The similarities are quite apparent, the movie plot mainly follows the basic plot that the book took, leaving the viewer’s with a sense of accomplishment, as this is sometimes not achieved in the highest degree. Scout still has a brother, Jem. They both still meet Dill and have a few adventures with him throughout the film. Jem and Scout still have a single father, Atticus, having lost their mother many years ago. Calpunia is still their cook. And the whole story still has an overpowering sense of focusing on two main stories, Boo Radley (Arthur Radley) and Tom Robinson’s trial.
F. Scott Fitzgerald was probably one of the most influential and significant writers that the world has ever known, for years after the publishing of his novel The Great Gatsby, two movies inspired from his book were released. The original film, entitled The Great Gatsby, directed by Jack Clayton, was released 1974. The newer film, also entitled The Great Gatsby, was directed by Baz Luhrmann, and released in 2013. Each film may have its original identity, and a unique way of telling the story, but they are also very similar in character representation, as well as in the plot.
In conclusion the Great Gatsby 2013 film adaptation is a piece of work that will be remembered for its stunning visuals not a gripping storyline. However this forgettable story is somewhat salvaged by the characterization of Jay Gatsby who shines through as someone to watch the movie just to see. The movie is quite split when it comes to the historical accuracy. Topics like Fashion and modes of transportation are not accurately represented while topics like race relations and the setting of New York City in the roaring 20s are excellently and accurately portrayed. In my opinion this movie with its masterful visual direction and the deep character Gatsby is a movie worth seeing. Who knows you could have a totally different opinion.
Overtime death and bootlegging change. Especially between this the book The Great Gatsby and the movie 1 and movie 2 of The Great Gatsby. The start in all three sources are different; in since that how the scenes are different,how Myrtle dies, and how Gatsby dies.
Two movies, one made in 1974 and one in 2013 are the most famous adaptations of the book The Great Gatsby. They are both similar, featuring memorable scenes like Myrtle’s and Gatsby’s parties. They are also different. The making of the 2013 movie is different because the technology now is extremely different from the technology in 1974. Special effects can drastically change the way a movie is made. The two movies, The Great Gatsby, are different in the format, the appearance of the characters, and the presentation of the book’s themes.
Thus, Luhrmann wrote the film adaptation of The Great Gatsby in 2013. Fitzgerald wrote 1925. That is almost a century in difference, with an entirely new generation. By changing the details characters and the setting, Luhrmann has allowed a great masterpiece to reach a young and new audience. Regardless of the differences, the tale of The Great Gatsby still excites audiences the same as it did in 1925.
“The Great Gatsby “, film adaptation directed by Baz Luhrmann in 2013 is almost as great as the novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1925. The Great Gatsby is a literary classic set in the 1920’s in the fictional town of West Egg. The tale is based on Nick Carraway, a Midwestern war veteran in the summer of 1922, who finds himself obsessed with the past lifestyle of his mysterious, fabulously and wealthy neighbour Jay Gatsby and his love for the beautiful Daisy Buchanan. This film adaptation compared to the novel is a very interesting one. It is also easily understood and keeps the viewers’ attention right through the movie.
Movies can enhance the experience of a story, but they aren’t always completely accurate to the book. The movie, The Great Gatsby, by Baz Luhrmann, is a good representation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel; however, there are quite a few differences between the two. Some differences include; the portrayal of the characters, the importance of symbolism, and events that were either added or taken out of the movie.
Trying to put together a movie based in such an acclaimed literary work like The Great Gatsby could never be an easy job, and it would be nearly impossible to recall all the tiny details presented in the book. Creating a cinematographic piece that embodies and preserve the heart and soul of this novel, and keep in all those unforgettable quotes that have been for years in the readers minds it is nearly impossible. With that there is no need to say that the director of the 2013 movie based on F. Scott Fitzgerald had a very complicated work to do. The way the author describes are as important has the dialogues in the book, there is always something between the lines and converting all of this into a script would make it lose some of the important