More handpicked essays just for you.
The power of american judiciary as a branch of the government
The judiciary the role of judges
The role of the supreme court in us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Nearly all rights that involve us are approved by state governments, and like so, state courts manage most arguments that control our day to day lives. Because federal courts protect several of our main laws, they are also very important in our lives. “Due to federalism, both the federal government and each of the state governments have their own court systems ("Comparing Federal & State Courts").” “State court systems vary from state to state, and each is a little different ("State Courts vs. Federal Courts", 2015). The American Court System consists of state courts and federal courts; they are two types of courts we have in our country. Although both courts have similar aspects, there is also many differences between the two courts. The …show more content…
Felonious trials concerning federal laws may only be heard by federal courts; however, most illegal trials contain infractions of state laws, and the state court is the court that tries those violations. Trials against the United States and cases including precise federal acts are some claims state courts are not authorized to hear. In numerous circumstances, state courts and federal courts have “jurisdiction.” This authorizes parties to decide either state court or federal court to trial their case ("What the Federal Courts …show more content…
They hear claims requiring the rules and settlements of the U.S. Arguments containing “ambassadors and public ministers” are also heard in federal courts. Federal courts trial cases that consist of controversy among several states. They also include “admiralty law, bankruptcy, and habeas corpus issues ("Comparing Federal & State Courts").” The U.S. district courts are the case courts of the federal court system. “Federal district courts have original jurisdiction over all cases involving alleged violations of federal statutes.” A community can be branched into segments, and it can have many places where the court trials different cases. “U.S. district courts handle tens of thousands of cases per year (Schmalleger).” “A court of appeals hears appeals from the district courts located within its circuit, as well as appeals from decisions of federal administrative agencies.” Most of the appeals from federal district courts develop into the court of appeals “serving the circuit in which the case was first heard. Federal appellate courts” have required jurisdiction over the agreement of district courts within their boundaries. Unlawful appeals from federal district courts are generally tried by committees of three inspectors situated on a court of appeals instead of by every judge of each boundary. “Appeals generally fall into one of three categories; frivolous appeals, ritualistic appeals,
a. but most admiralty cases can be brought in state courts unless they qualify under diversity. b. But federal admiralty law will be applied. iii. Jurisdiction arises under: a. 28 USC 1331: federal question b. 28 USC 1332: diversity c. iv. BUT, Congress didn’t choose to enact substantive law in the statutes – left to the courts. v. Courts mainly address three issues: a. what is an admiralty case? b. if it is, what is the admiralty rule?
According to Anthony Lewis, author of Gideon’s Trumpet, federalism is “the independence of the states in our federal system of government” (Lewis 89). In other words, federalism is the state’s power to make decisions for itself rather than the federal government making decisions for every state. The fate of federalism is discussed in the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright. In this case, Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for burglary in Florida. When Gideon was tried, the court did not grant him a lawyer because, according to Florida state law, lawyers are only given in capital cases. Because Gideon believed he was not protected under the sixth amendment, he brought his case to the Supreme Court so that it can be decided if or if not all
among the nation's founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free to create laws, and state court systems were needed to hear cases in which violations of those laws occurred. Today, however, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts involve themselves in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statues and federal constitutional guarantees. When that happens, claimed violations of federal due process guarantees especially those found in the Bill of Rights.
The 14th Amendment had far-reaching consequences on the American constitution and there were several aspects that were deeply influenced by the tenets of this Amendment. One of these was the shift of focus from federal courts to state courts. The federal nature of the US government shifted its focus to the role and significance of states in protecting the rights of its citizens and safeguarding the laws for effective implementation of equal disposition of legal rights to all citizens. Prior to the 14th Amendment the Bill of Rights held the federal courts responsible for safeguarding laws at both federal and state level. With the passing of the 14th Amendment, the state courts were made responsible for ensuring that all citizens received equal rights (NALEO, 2).
Appeals are known as direct attacks because they target the decisions made by the trial court and/or the jury’s guilty verdict in the specific defendant’s criminal trial. If denied a review, the offender may act on another standpoint. Habeas corpus proceeding approaches the case in a different manner and directs the attention to a civil lawsuit. State and federal court review may vary from jurisdiction. State courts provide collateral review for defendants convicted in state court. While the federal court review provides collateral review for defendants in both state and federal court. Habeas corpus is important as the reviewing of cases ensures the accuracy of the case
To begin with, the United States’ Supreme Court is the utmost federal court in the government, established with precedence over the lower court system. It has appellate jurisdiction over all cases concerning the Constitution and/or federal law. For a case to reach the Supreme Court, the conflict is required to be between two or more states, concerning an ambassador, or a violation of the Constitution. One case that reached the Supreme Court of the United States was Mapp v. Ohio. Dollree Mapp was arrested in May of 1957 for the ownership of lewd materials, including obscene photographs and books. After she was incarcerated for this crime, she appealed her case to the Supreme Court against the State of Ohio. Ernesto Miranda’s case against the State of Arizona also extended to the Supreme Court in 1966. The appellant was arrested and convicted for the kidnapping
Court systems between states can vary significantly while maintaining the same general functions. Georgia state court structure is set up to handle a large number of proceedings. To understand how the system is able to accommodate the numerous counties and the growing population we must consider the types of courts that are in place, the process of putting judges into place, and how the jury is chosen to facilitate the courts.
How are federal courts of general jurisdiction different from state courts of general jurisdiction? State courts deal with every day cases dealing with state laws and regulations. They can vary from criminal procedures in civil or family cases, to lower offenses, such as parking tickets. They tend to be specific to the laws of each state, as the state is allowed to form their own set of laws to keep their residents “free and treat them equally”. Federal courts on the other hand, hear criminal that violate the US Constitution and/or cases that cross state lines , along with civil cases or bankruptcy cases. Both courts have appellate courts and interprets the laws (either state or federal laws). Federal court is more selective on the cases it
The Supreme Court and Federal court have the same authority as in the Constitution. This system is called checks and balances which prevents the sole power of any one of the three branches. In addition, this power can be divided between the states and Federal government. The Federal government’s role in “domestic and foreign affairs and how they have grown” (Fe...
Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).
The judges that are a part of this group has many different roles, some of which are to issues warrants, making a determination of probable cause in evidence, denying or granting bail to offenders, overseeing trials, making rulings on different motions and even overseeing hearings. The prosecuting attorney is the one who will represent that state in c...
According to Roger Miller, “trial courts that have general jurisdiction as to the subject matter may be called county, district, superior, or circuit courts.” The majority of their cases are to be handled in-county first before proceeding further through the court system. Just as businesses and organizations have a chain-of-command or protocol system, the government has the same. Then, there are the circuit courts coming in as the middle step of the judicial system.
The US court system consists of a trial court, an appellate court, and a supreme or high court. The trial court is the first to hear the facts of a case and has original jurisdiction. The appellate court hears cases whose resolution is disputed by the losing party in the trial court. The supreme or high court hears cases whose outcome is disputed by the losing party in the appellate court. The supreme or high court chooses which cases warrant a hearing. The federal and the state court system have the same basic structure. Each consists of a trial court, an appellate court, and a supreme or high court. The Federal Court of Appeals has thirteen (13) circuits which cover most states except the District of Columbia. The federal system also has specialty courts such as the Court of Federal Claims and the United States Tax Court.
This ranges from sentencing convicted criminals to resolving disagreements between the states. The federal court system has jurisdiction over some of the nation’s most important arguments. While the Founding Fathers may have had good reasons when granting federal judges lifetime appointments. Right now, it presents fundamental problems. The increasing life expectancy of federal judges in recent years and relative immunity of their positions raises questions about the comparison of lifetime terms.
The American Court System is an important part of American history and one of the many assets that makes America stand out from other countries. It thrives for justice through its structured and organized court systems. The structures and organizations are widely influenced by both the State and U.S Constitution. The courts have important characters that used their knowledge and roles to aim for equality and justice. These court systems have been influenced since the beginning of the United State of America. Today, these systems and law continue to change and adapt in order to keep and protect the peoples’ rights.