Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legal judicial decision making
Roles of judges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legal judicial decision making
Judges and Their Roles
The Lord Chancellor plays a crucial role in the appointment of all
judges.
The selection and appointment procedure for district judges, recorders
and circuit judges is broadly the same. Suitably qualified candidates
apply to the Judicial Appointments Department of the Lord Chancellor’s
Department (LCD) in response to an advertisement. References are taken
up, and wider ‘secret surroundings’ are carried out by officials
within the LCD. A shortlist is prepared and those candidates are
interviewed by a panel of three – a circuit judge, an official from
the Judicial Appointment Department and a lay member. The interview
panel recommends candidates to the Lord Chancellor, who then makes the
appointment.
To become a High Court Judge, candidates may either apply in response
to an advertisement or be invited by the Lord Chancellor to consider
the position. Considerable ‘secret surroundings’ are carried out. In
addition, the opinions of all serving High Court judges are sought.
Those candidates who are short-listed are then reviewed by the Lord
Chancellor and the four Head of Division (the Lord Chief Justice, the
Master of the Rolls, the President of Family Division, and the
Vice-Chancellor). Successful candidates are appointed by the Lord
Chancellor.
Lord Justices of Appeal are always appointed from the ranks of High
Court Judges. The Lord Chancellor will invite such judges to consider
appointment to the Court of Appeal, having discussed their suitability
with existing Lords Justices and Law Lords. The Lord Chancellor then
makes a recommendation to the prime minister, who formally recommends
the person...
... middle of paper ...
... in the nineteenth century and
stated that ‘no person is punishable except for a distinct breach of
the law established in the courts’ and not only is no man ‘above the
law, but that every man, whatever be his rank, is subject to the
ordinary law of realm’.
There are many problems with the judicial role, these are, if there is
lack of training on a judges part, this can affect the outcome of a
case and may also affect the decision-making. There is also a lack of
specialism in a certain area; this would be improved if a judge was
appointed who had a specific area of interest that they can relate to.
There are also issues with miscarriage of justice.
Other than those few problems with the judicial role, it appears to be
working fairly well, without the judicial role, decisions to a case
may be harder to finalise.
...te Standing Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs suggested a resigning age for all elected judges. This suggestion was focused around an apparent need to keep up fiery and element courts in opening up boulevards for 'capable legitimate professionals' to attain legal positions. It is likewise focused around developing group faith in a necessary resigning age for judges and to dodge 'the sad need' of uprooting a judge made unfit for office by declining health.
“ ….Judgments, right or wrong. This concern with concepts such as finality, jurisdiction, and the balance of powers may sound technical, lawyerly, and highly abstract. But so is the criminal justice system….Law must provide simple answers: innocence or guilt, freedom or imprisonment, life or death.” (Baude, 21).
Supreme Court and Court of Appeals judges are elected in nonpartisan statewide elections. Mid-term vacancices are filled by appointment. State law requires that nominees are state residents and have practiced law for a minimum of seven years.
The governance of our present day public and social order co-exist within the present day individual. Attempts to recognize the essentiality of equality in hopes of achieving an imaginable notion of structure and order, has led evidence based practitioners such as Herbert Packer to approach crime and the criminal justice system through due process and crime control. A system where packer believed in which ones rights are not to be infringed defrauded or abused was to be considered to be the ideal for procedural fairness. “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” Thomas Jefferson pg 9 cjt To convict an individual because proper consideration was not taken will stir up social unrest rather then it’s initial intent, when he or she who has committed the crime is not punished for their doings can cause for a repetition and even collaboration with other’s for a similar or greater crime.
The Judicial Branch is the balancing factor of the Government. It is the listener of the people of the US and it decides on all matters regarding the people. It "interprets the nation's law" (World Book 141). Being able to interpret the law gives the Judicial branch a special kind of power. One of which the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch do not possess. The Judicial branch decides when a law has been broken, to what extent, and how to punish the criminal act. And that is what makes it the strongest branch.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
Lord Chancellor has played a central role in the English legal system, but the position is currently being reformed following persistent criticism due to the theory separation of powers which stated that the state powers should operate independently and any of it should not be combined. The Lord Chancellor has had such wide powers, which extended to all three state powers. First, the Lord Chancellor’s judicial power which is one of the most prominent power that he has. The Lord Chancellor has been a judge in the House of Lords and Privy Council, President of the Supreme Court, and he has also officially been President of the Chancery Division of the High Court. As for his legislative role, the Lord Chancellor has been a Cabinet Minister and Speaker of the House of Lords. Although technically appointed by the Queen, the Lord Chancellor is actually chosen by the Prime Minister and goes out of office when that party loses an election, as well as being eligible for removal by the Prime Minister. The executive power of the Lord Chancellor is government minister, he was at the head of the Lord Chancellor’s department. He had powers to give directions about the business of the courts, and responsibility for the Law Commission and the state funding of legal services. Most controversially, he has had control over the judicial appointments. It is clear that the powers of Lord Chancellor is against the theory of
changed in terms of its power of deciding cases. It has on the other hand
This theory looks at how the sovereign and its officials created the law based on social norms and the institutions (Hart, 1958). However, hard cases such as this makes for bad law, which test the validity of the law at hand based on what the objective of the law was in the first place. The law should not be so easily dismissed just because it does not achieve justice in the most morally sound manner (Hart, 1958). Bentham and Austin understood that there are two errors in the way law is understood, what the law is and what the law should be (Hart, 1958). He knew that if law was to become what humans perceived the law ought to be, the law itself would be lost, but he also recognized that if the opposite was to occur where the law replaced morality, than any man would escape liability and there would be no retribution (Hart, 1958). This theory looks at the point of view of the dissenting judge, Justice Gray, which is that the law is what it is, even if it may conflict with morals. Austin stated that “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry (Hart, 1958).” This case presents the same conflict that Bentham and Austin addressed, that the law based on the statute of the
Madison’s statement means that each branch of government should propose its agendas separate from the other branches. This does not mean that the branches should seek to conflict with one another, but rather that they should propose ideas, based on benefit of the people, within the confines of their own branch. In doing so, it is less likely that the three powers will concentrate, and an efficient system of checks and balances is achieved because each branch can recognize fault in the other without bias.
Whether a judge should be elected or appointed has been a topic for discussion since the creation of a judicial system. Depending on what side of the decision one may be on, there are some challenges that arise from each side. If a judge is elected, will he be judicious in his decision based on the law or based on his constituents? If the judge is appointed, will he be subject to the authority that appointed him, thereby slanting his decision to keep favor of the executive or legislator that appointed him? Mandatory retirement is also a question that brings about challenges. How old is too old? When does a judge become ineffective based on their age?
The American Court System is an important part of American history and one of the many assets that makes America stand out from other countries. It thrives for justice through its structured and organized court systems. The structures and organizations are widely influenced by both the State and U.S Constitution. The courts have important characters that used their knowledge and roles to aim for equality and justice. These court systems have been influenced since the beginning of the United State of America. Today, these systems and law continue to change and adapt in order to keep and protect the peoples’ rights.
American courts play an essential role in our justice system. America has a dual court
INTRODUCTION: Parliament, the supreme law-making body, has unrestricted legislative power, and the laws it passes cannot be set aside by the courts. The role of judges, in relation to laws enacted by Parliament, is to interpret and apply them, rather than to pass judgment on whether they are good or bad laws. However, evidence has shown that they have a tendency to deviate from their ‘real roles’ and instead formulate laws on their own terms. Thus, the real role of a judge in any legal system continues to be a phenomenon questioned by many.
Firstly in this report, I will be giving the different definitions of rule of law by different philosophers; secondly, I will be applying the rule of law to the English Legal system and thirdly I will be explaining separation of powers with a focus on the impartial judiciary. Finally, I will be using cases to support every detailed point given.