Compare And Contrast Rainsford And Zaroff

666 Words2 Pages

In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford is a skilled, widely known hunter from New York City. When he falls off his yacht, he swims to Ship-Trap Island where he meets the owner of the island, General Zaroff, who is also a hunter. Rainsford soon discovers that Zaroff plans a dangerous game in which he traps ships, so he can hunt and kill those on board. The protagonist Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff share common beliefs about hunting, but when they are pitted against each other in Zaroff’s inhumane game their truly different personalities, attitudes, and morals conflict, resulting in Rainsford killing Zaroff for the greater good. In different ways, Rainsford and Zaroff each divide the world into two classes. On the …show more content…

He believes, “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure,” (9). Zaroff grew bored of hunting animals, so he now hunts humans. He explains, “It had become too easy. I always got my quarry. There is no greater bore than perfection. No animal had a chance with me anymore,” (7). Zaroff decides humans are the ideal game to hunt because they are able to reason and are more of a challenge. At first Rainsford does not think Zaroff is serious. When Rainsford realizes Zaroff is serious, he disagrees with Zaroff’s style of hunting and calls him a murderer. “Hunting? Great Guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder,” (8). It is obvious Zaroff has no morals regarding murder. He explains why he hunts people, “it gives me pleasure,” and he feels they are “more dangerous,” (9) than any game he’s hunted before. Rainsford is disgusted when he finds out Zaroff wants him to hunt humans with him, instead of fascinated as Zaroff hoped. In Zaroff’s eyes, Rainsford is weak, so instead of hunting with Zaroff, Rainsford is hunted by

Open Document