Compare And Contrast One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest

776 Words2 Pages

Often books are better than movies, but with the movie One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest that did not seem to be the case. While the novel by Ken Kesey was fantastic, I feel that director Milos Forman’s film adaptation was much better. The actors chosen for the characters was perfect and each one fit their descriptions spot on. The book and the movie were very similar and had very minor differences. It was definitely worth watching and I would recommend it to others. In this review, I will talk about the differences between the two and the significance of the changes, my opinion of both, and the overall sense of theme that had developed.
Watching the movie and reading the book back to back is not something I do often, but for these two I did. It made the differences more noticeable and significant in my mind. The novel’s point of view is through Chief Bromden, while the movie selects Randall McMurphy to be the main character. This would be the only significant change that made such a huge difference. This point of view allowed for the …show more content…

Fear was clearly present in the patients who could hear the her walking down the hall, footsteps louder and louder as she grew near. The theme, control hinders dignity, is better seen visually. Desperation is a very hard mood to describe and after the climax of the story, there is a desperate fight for control within the ward. The mood shift after McMurphy breaking the nurse’s stations glass is also prevalent in the film. The movie made it more clear that the patients were also rebelling, and perhaps more than McMurphy, throughout most of the story and not just the end. Once that control was broken, a snowball of freedom had begun to roll and the patients would not let her win anymore. Dignity was fully restored. The movie truly showed the joy of the patients and what felt like to get themselves

Open Document