Comparison of Book and Film of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey

914 Words2 Pages

Comparison of Book and Film of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey There are differences and similarities in the book "One flew over the

cuckoo's nest" by Ken Kesey and the movie, which is based on the

novel. The characters are the same, so is Nurse Ratchard in both the

book and the movie represented as an angry and two faced woman. She

wants to have the absolute control over the ward and therefore

manipulates the men. The only thing that is not equal in regard to the

nurse is here physical appearance. While she has a face like a baby

doll with a small nose, white skin and baby-blue eyes, pink lips and

nails and big breasts, which she tries to hide in the book, she is

more a normal woman, without remarkable make-up or breasts in the

movie. But her character and behavior is represented in the same way.

She doesn't like McMurphy, who actually was on a working farm, but

could manage to be send to the hospital. There he wants to have a nice

time and entertain the other patients. He plays poker and basketball

with them and slowly gives them there self-confidence back, which they

lost over the last years under the control of the nurse and therefore

he wins there appreciation. The nurse and he seem to be in competition

the whole time, who of them has more influence on the patients. He is

played exactly the same way as he is described in the Kesey's

original: as an open and self-confident man with oxblood colored skin,

who is walking like a motorcyclist and don't like to be ordered

around. The patient that we get to know the most in...

... middle of paper ...

...actor. Nobody cares how long a book

is. The author can nearly write as much as he likes, but the film

would be too long with all the scenes that are described.

The point of view in the motion picture is totally different from the

point of view in the book. In the story Bromden is the narrator, a

first person narrator. That's the reason why he has to take part in

all events Kesey wants us to know about. Otherwise there would be no

way we would get this information. This point of view is good, because

we see and feel with Bromden, who is a very important character. But

on the other hand we never know, what the others are thinking, except

Bromden would talk to them. That's why an omniscient narrator, like

the camera represents it in the movie, is very useful, because it can

watch into everybody and shows their feelings.

Open Document