Compare And Contrast Michelangelo And Michelangelo

827 Words2 Pages

Both existed during the Renaissance era which brought evolution to art, culture, and a way of life. Reforms occurred throughout within religion, political, and scientific beliefs. Leonardo matured in life while under the roof of his father and began his apprenticeship with Verrocchio painting at age fourteen. Upon earning more knowledge in painting, Leonardo became curios of anatomy which commenced his sketches of the human body focusing on skeletons and muscles (History, 2009). Michelangelo was a product of a long line of bankers and grew up in Florence, Italy which is where he began his apprenticeship with Ghirlandaio. Following the years with Ghirlandaio, he studied at the Humanist Academy majoring in art (History, 2010). Comparison of the two’s different lives lead some to believe that Leonardo was little educated but this hardly effected his curious mind while …show more content…

Although they were rivals, they dabbled in two different types of art mostly. Leonardo was a profound painter with interest in science, whereas Michelangelo found his way around sculptures. He considered sculptures to be the most important aspect in visual arts. Examining Michelangelo’s works throughout time, a resemblance to contemporary society is shown. Major products of Michelangelo include the statue of David and the fresco ceiling of the Sistine Chapel (History, 2010). The combination of imagination and the technical skills produced renaissance sculptures that contain all aspects of accuracy and harmony. The sculpture of David was considered the greatest sculptor to be produced during the renaissance era. When considered the works from the Sistine Chapel ceilings, the psychological insight, intensity, and the physically visual realism are all combined to produce an excellent painting which showed off his ability in paintings as

Open Document