Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In "Eros" by Robert Bridges and Anne Stevenson show a different prospective of the Greek mythology god of love. Robert Bridges poem shows an admiration and idolization for Eros. Unfortunately, Anne Stevenson poem shows how Eros is being degraded by the human. Even though both poems are talking about Eros the ideas are drastically different, but the tone is similar, however, both use similar and different techniques to upbringing their poems. In addition, the ways Eros is being physically portrayed in both poems are different. In Bridges's poem the usage of "idol of the human race ", "tyrants of the human heart ", "...exuberant flesh so fair that Pheidias might compare ", "proud dress". Bridges is describing the beauty of Eros that is beautiful …show more content…
and no other Gods can be compared to him. In line 13, " Surly thy body is thy mind", makes a reference to Eros' body that is so beautiful even his mind is as beautiful as his body. However, in Stevenson's poem Eros' physical traits are different. The author uses, " This thug with a broken nose", " With boxer lips", "And patchy wings". Eros is being harshly described in this poem compared to Bridges poem. Eros is beautiful in the first poem, but in Stevenson poem Eros is being portrayed by his weakness and the ugliness state that he is in. Unfortunately, Eros is being differed from both poems. In Bridges poem Eros is being known as a great god, "Thou idol of the human race Though tyrant of the human heart". But in Stevenson poem Eros is nothing " We slaves who are immortals". The poets show a different perspective of Eros. In the first poem Eros is being a value by the human as such an important god, but in the second poem he is not, he is being treated like slave by the human. In both poem Eros face is being described differently. In lines 14-15 of Bridges poem " For in thy face is nought find, Only thy soft unchristen'd smile," the poet describe the face as emotionless but Eros does have a smile on his face. Furthermore , in Stevenson poem lines 21-22 " Better my battered visage, Bruised but hot,". The poet is describing the constantly beating he get from and by the human. The poems drastically differed from the face emotion and physical being. Even though, the poems are different they both have similar tone to them. In both "Eros" poems the authors are sympathetic towards the fact that Eros is getting treated differently . They are profoundly coming across the same value point about the life of the Greek god of love. The "Eros" poems both use similar techniques and also different techniques.
In both Eros poems the techniques that are similar are; imagery and allusion. In Bridges poem the imagery came from line 4 "Thy flower of lovely youth that art", and in Stevenson's poem there are a lot of imagery that are being referenced " This thug with a broken nose", " With boxer lips", "And patchy wings". Both poets created a different outlooks of Eros. Also, the allusions from both poems are being shown. In the first poem the allusion was in line 8, " That only Pheidias might compare", in the second poem the allusion came from line 17, " We slaves who are immortal". The poets made a quick reference by adding the details of another Greek immortal to compare Eros to him or her. The techniques that are different are; the dictions, and the way poem is being presented. The diction in the first poem is formal, the poet uses words as; "exuberant", "guile", "sensuous innocence", as for the second poem the diction is informal, the poet uses such as words as; "thug", "my bully boy" "We slaves...". Bridges and Stevenson demonstrate the different level of respect they have for Eros. The way the poet present both of their poem are drastically different. Bridges did not use dialogue as Stevenson did to show a different prospective of how they see
Eros.
This does not make up for the lack of other poetic elements, and the simplicity of the writing. The differences between the two pieces is still very vass. The two pieces have two totally different objectives, which makes them have different writing styles. Claire Dederer writes “Song lyrics do a fine imitation of poetry, but they’re not quite the same thing. Lyrics are a vessel, designed to hold a singer’s voice.
Although both poems are set in the same environment, and that the visual structure of the poems are similar. Once you look deeper and analysis the poems it becomes clear that they have been written in very different styles, and very different but as powerful emotions running through them i.e. grief and resignment. One poet has a future to look forward to; the other knows that death is around the corner. One poet could not have for scene a death, the other is questioning weather the ‘black diamond dust’ was worth it on reflection.
The imagery used in the two poems is very similar at times. Both authors describe to the readers a picturesque view of nature, like plants blooming in the springs. Proof of this is found in “Lone Bather'; : “ is plant with lilies bursting from its heels.'; Similarly, in “The Swimmer'; the first
In the poems, “EΡΩΣ” by Robert Bridges and “Eros” by Anne Stevenson both have similar yet distinct concepts of the God of love. “EΡΩΣ” describes the concept of love as being conflicted between humans view of Eros as the god of love and lust; where as Stevenson’s poem describes Eros as being bruised and beat up as a result of this constant misunderstanding by humanity. Thus, both poems are similar with their description of Eros’ constant struggles with human nature.
Two different poems regarding to Eros open with a call out to the god of Eros and long for an answer. Both poems begin with a description of Eros’s face that defines who is Eros in two different perspectives. Although the subject matter and the structure of the poem are similar between the two, the use of figurative speech, such as apostrophe and imagery, and rhyme completely changes the meaning. Bridges sets Eros as a distant god placed above humans, while Stevenson identifies a god as a slave bruised by human desires.
There are many similarities and differences between the two poems: “When We Two Parted”, written by Lord Bryon, and “La Belle Dames Sans Merci”, written by John Keats. I shall be exploring these poems and seeing connections and differences between them, so that I am able to compare them.
The structure of the poem “Eros” helps to characterize the god. The poem is divided into three clear stanzas, each with eight lines. The lines are short, often with just three or four words apiece. The opening two lines question the character that has appeared before the speaker. “I call for love / But help me, who arrives?” (1-2). This introduces Eros to the reader. By starting with an introduction, “Stevenson allows the following scene to unfold with perfect clarity” (Donnelly
The use of formal language is more associated with dignity and respectfulness, which Bridges’ was trying to aim for in his poem. This makes the Eros in Bridges’ poem more disconnected from reality. Using modern language makes Eros seem more “human-like”, because of the hits he has taken from human lust and is seen as more vulnerable. The dialogue (or lack thereof) causes a difference in how Eros is seen. The rhyme schemes helped convey different feelings within the two poems. Bridges’ has a more formal and traditional rhyme scheme while Stevenson has a disjoint simple 4-line scheme. Bridges’ poem, Eros is simply admired from far away, while Stevenson’s poem has the speaker and Eros actually engage in dialogue. Both are similar however, in that they convey a message of not understanding love. In Bridges’ poem the speaker cannot fully understand love because he cannot see Eros’ face, and in Stevenson’s poem the speaker, as well as others cannot understand love, because they deceive themselves into what they think actual love
There are no differences in the poems themselves as they are both set in the same scene but different centuries one has a negative point on the poem whereas the other has a positive however they tell the same story but in different words.
..., they are somewhat similar in comparison because they both have an inevitable ending, death. Both of the poems also used rhythm to give the reader a better insight and experience. The use of rhythm helps to set the tone right away. The use of symbolism and tone helped to convey an overall theme with both of the poems.
Therefore, although both poems are written on similar topics, the poems are quite different, mainly only agreeing on the fact that war is wrong.
Both poems where written in the Anglo-Saxton era in Old English and later translated into English. As well as both poems being written in the same time period, they are both elegiac poems, meaning they are poignant and mournful.
When considering the structure of the poems, they are similar in that they are both written loosely in iambic pentameter. Also, they both have a notable structured rhyme scheme.
The only strong comparison between the poets, in terms of structure and technique, is that the meaning of their poems run much deeper then the specific words on a page. Even this can come as a contrast when looking at these three poems. “Home Burial,” by Frost is a fairly straightforward poem, written in dialogue, with the writer working as the narrator. The poem is about a married couple dealing wi...
Death is important to both poems because it expresses each character’s reaction and the importance of accepting death. If you don’t you’ll be grieving and angry for a long time. Both poems tie in with each other due to this, but are different because the characters reacted differently.