Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative research method
Narrative analysis reflections
Narrative techniques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In both the film and the book Bernice Bobs Her Hair, there are some main ideas that mirror and deflect on another. In the book, everything has to be detailed and described down to every last detail, while in the movie, the director had to make sure that the items in the house, barbershop, and in any setting was just as it was in that time period. Many things that were explained in the story go by so quickly in the movie and you have to take notice of every little detail that went into the making of the film. The only things that were changed in the film were slight, if not, unnoticed to you that were mentioned in the book. As well as how they leave you hanging at the end of the story. The one thing that really pops out at me that is similar …show more content…
to the book is that in the film, Bernice and Marjorie's relationship is something that's out of the ordinary. At first, Bernice is a very introverted girl and nobody really seems to make any notice of her, but once Bernice gives into Marjorie's "helpful advice," Bernice soon realizes how much of a butt Marjorie really is. But yet, she still takes her advice, resulting in her to become more popular, like Marjorie. Another thing that was really evident in the film is how amazing and new Bernice's life had changed so quickly. "To Bernice the next week was a revelation. With the feeling that people really enjoyed looking at her and listening to her came the foundation of self-confidence. Of course there were numerous mistakes at first." In part five of the book, you see how Bernice's life has evolved into something finally enjoyable to her, but that of course, came with a price. Because of the pressure that was put onto her by not only everyone, but most importantly, Marjorie, she was led into the idea of getting her hair bobbed. The film really showed you how worried and uncomfortable Bernice was at the idea of it, and especially when it finally came down to her sitting in the barbershop chair and everyone was crowded around her. Now for the differences, there were some things that also popped out for me as well.
How the story ends in the book is totally different from the movie. In the book, it ends with Bernice, holding her luggage in one hand, and the two braids that were cut off of Marjorie in the other, she has an impulse to do something pretty nice, in my opinion, by throwing the braids onto Warren's porch, laughed, then ran down the street. In the movie, however, she takes the braids and throws them into the car, then walks away. In that way of ending a film, I think that it doesn't make as much of a statement as it did when she threw the braids onto Warren's porch in the book. By ending the film like the book did, what you get from it is more of an reaction and a bigger impacted statement. There is also more that's unknown to the end of the story that people watching will want to know about. When watching the film, the ending leaves you with just thinking about what Marjorie will wake up to with short hair and how she'll react when finding Bernice missing and the braids in the car. But when you read the book, it leaves you with not only what you get in the movie, but it puts Warren into the mix. How Bernice created a relationship with Warren is what caused Marjorie to become jealous and more hurtful to Bernice since she previously had a relationship with him as well. Another thing that stands out is how Bernice's and Marjorie's hair color is flipped. Bernice is the one who is supposed to
have the dark brown hair, not Marjorie. You can either take it as it's just how it ended up to be, or you can look at it in a symbolic way. Since Marjorie is the one with the dark hair, that could symbolize her dominance over Bernice, as well as her having a more dark side of who she really is as a person. But for Bernice, her hair is a very light brown, some would say blonde, and that could be taken as how she's an innocent person and is the more pure person and different around all of Marjorie's friends, who all have dark hair. For both the film and the book, what it leaves you with in the end is the most important thing. Of course, everyone has their own opinion on things and looks at things differently, but the main focus of it all is social status. Anyone watching or reading the story can somehow relate to what Bernice is going through. Everyone tries to fit in at school, public events, or whatever it may be, and we all have struggled with that in different ways than others. It really goes to show how something so simple, like how you have your hair, shows your social status and how people will treat you.
For starters, the ending of the movie was very different from the book. Instead of Vera hanging herself and everyone ends up being dead like in the book, the director of the movie makes a plot twist to make the movie end with two survivors. Philip Lombard and Vera Claythorne are the two survivors who find out who the killer is. They are the only ones alive to escape. Another small change that occured was when some of the victims died for example, Emily Brent. Instead of expecting that everyone dies and there being no resolution, the director decided to make that change so that there could be hope for the
Second there is more detail in the book than the movie. Well, I think that more detail is better because the more you know the better you understand the movie or
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
I think that most of the event in the movie were not in the same order that Jeannette had wrote them. After reading the book I had a different picture in mind of how each character would look and it threw me off for the rest of the movie. I did like the fact that I could see what was happening and not just imagine things in my head that I thought was happening, as I was watching the movie I was seeing the same thing everyone else was and not just what I was picturing while reading the
In the movie, they missed things or changed parts, but they also quoted the book quiet a lot and make the story more a like. Most of the most important parts were in the movie. They missed one of the camps that Corrie was sent to and the didn’t show much of the 100th year party of the watch shop besides a picture. I liked the book way more than the movie because the book had more detail and made you understand what that part of WWII was like more than the movie does. In the book Corrie is learning how to have more faith and trust in God more but in the movie, she had a lot of faith the whole time and she didn’t struggle with that as much. I enjoyed reading about that because it made me feel like I’m not the only one that struggles.
Some of the characters in the novel, like Lennie, are portrayed differently in the movie. In the novel, Lennie is said to be “a huge man” (2), but in the movie he isn’t very big, although he is bigger than George and some of the other characters. In the movie he is stronger and bigger than the others, but not to the extreme amount that the book portrays him to be. Also, Lennie is depicted as very mentally challenged, which is shown by the way he speaks. Whereas in the book, Lennie is said to have a mind of a young child instead of being disabled. As well as Lennie, Curley’s wife is represented a little bit differently. In the movie,...
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
Each version also has the main characters boarding up the windows. Anyone who thought the birds won’t attack are usually found dead, but in the movie they are found with their eyes pecked out. Also, both the story and the movie have REALLY bad endings! They aren’t very similar, but they both leave you hanging. When you see a movie or read a book you want to know what happens to the main characters. In these two, you didn’t get an ending. They left you hanging and for some people that ruins it all.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
The decision of the screenwriter and director to cut out what I felt were several story arcs and scenes from the novel was very disappointing. For example, in the movie there is no mention of Beth's shyness, or of her overcoming that shyness to become friends with Mr. Lawrence. The scene in the novel where she gathers her courage to walk over to his house and thank him for giving her his piano is one of the most defining moments for Beth. Overall I found Beth and Mr. Lawrence to both be sadly underdeveloped in the movie. Mr. Lawrence appears in only three scenes, while many of Beth's key moments also vanished. Jo's wonderful tomboyish nature is also severely tone-down for this version. She does not say "Christopher Columbus"; nor any of her other slang words. We never see the scene where she longs to go be a soldier fighting in the war and wishes she were a man. They transformed the character of Meg from someone who longs for finer things and tends to be snobbish into the wise older sister who does not care about such things. Lacking is the wonderful moment when she realizes that she does not care about Mr. Brook's poverty as she staunchly defends her love of him against Aunt March. While Amy's quest for a perfect nose is mentioned twice, there is never a scene showing some of her efforts such as her wearing the clothespin on it at night to make is straight, nor do we get enjoy watching her artistic endeavors such as her attempts to make a plaster cast of her foot.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
The book and the movie are both very different, yet they are also the same in a few ways. In the book they had different characters, then the movie. In the movie they had gotten rid of some of the characters and then added new ones. The theme in the movie and the book is the same.
Pleased with the quality of work as to be excepted by any major film producer, though expecting to follow the book chronologically was quickly a disappointment. Having read the book first then to watch the movie to find key scenes either in a different story line or to have not seen them all was rampant throughout the movie. This had ruined the way Jeanette had grown up, seemingly altering who she grew to be due to the events happening out of sequence.