What Are The Similarities Between Ancient Rome And Modern Rome

1452 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast greek and roman artworks

At first the Ancient Rome and Modern Rome paintings look vaguely similar. They both are a painting of an enormous room with various paintings filling every square inch of it. Ancient Rome presents Rome with all of its famous monuments, sculptures, and statues as a way to illustrate the accomplishments of their time. While Modern Rome introduces the new buildings, monuments, and statues as Rome’s new accomplishment and even the possibility of new ideas. Both paintings resemble each other quite similarly in their setting of frames, lighting, the drape covering parts of the gallery, and the people present in the painting. Giovanni Panini interestingly created with these two paintings as mirrors inside a museum, illustrating how a museum appears …show more content…

The Modern Rome painting is a gallery with paintings of the monuments and landmarks of the city. It comprises of paintings of St. Peter’s Square, Trevi Fountain, and the various fountains in Rome. Also, Modern Rome contains Michelangelo’s Moses and some of Bernini’s most acclaimed statues. The men in the gallery of this painting are all positioned in a circle as they appear to be having a conversation and sharing with each other paintings, plans, and ideas. Some of the men hold papers in their hands; one holds the painting while another man appears to be recreating the same painting. Giovanni Panini and the man whom Panini painted it for, Count de Stainville, are both present in the painting as the man holding the plans and the man sitting in the arm chair, respectively. Count de Stainville holds a gaze which cuts through the painting and connects the viewer of the real world with the gallery in the painting. There is a lion statue in the painting and it stands in the light, as it lively plays with a ball. And oddly there is a tree branch directly next to the lion statue, still green and full of leaves. The tree branch full of green leaves can imply that the gallery is full of life and potential. However, the tree branch leads to the questioning of why is there a tree branch in a gallery, and where did it …show more content…

In Ancient Rome and Modern Rome, the consistency of the similarities are what connects them entirely. These paintings depict a gallery filled with paintings, sculptures, and statues. The setting of the frames are almost identical in the two paintings. The lighting in each gallery comes from the northwest corner, which highlights the men in the room. Even the men are quite similar, some even being the same person. In the paintings, a drape covers some parts of the gallery and hangs on top of the painting. Every aspect in the paintings are somehow a parallel to the other painting, therefore linking the

Show More
Related

  • Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak: Painting Analysis

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    If someone who had no prior knowledge about art, or the elements and principles of design, were given five seconds to look at these two paintings, they’d probably say they had almost nothing in common, other than the fact that they both feature mountains, and it’d be true for those people. But, if you are someone that does know a lot of information

    Read More

  • Comparison Essay

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, although Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II and Augustus of Primaporta, do appear very different, come from entirely different geographic regions and were separated by thousands of years, they do have many things in common. When we consider subject, style, and function; perhaps other works of art have more in common than they appear to have.

    Read More

  • View Of Molo Analysis

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    When looking at the painting it gives us a glimpse of the past. It looks almost like a photograph. The fine detail from the building on the right with the statue on top. The citizens walking around.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Greek Art And American Art

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    And just like the Greek the statue are both big and almost human size. A great example of this is the “Augustus of Primaporta, 1st century C.E. (Vatican Museums).” It truly shows the evolution of art sculpting. It is a full size very detailed sculpture of Augustus. It very detailed from his hair showing every curl and split to the small details in his armor that also depicts a story as well is shows the god of the sky looking down on him and the goddess of the earth looking up towards him as they watch the Parthians surrender to him and returning the standards shows the great power that Augustus has, and not just that but also the sculpture itself is a symbol for how Augustus wanted everyone to see him as, as god like. And it even has a little small cupid on the side which is also detailed which shows that Augusts is decedent from a

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Perugino And Caravaggio

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    painting even though the event represented in the painting took place long before the Roman Empire. The center temple that occupies the background has a vanishing point running through its doorway and if it weren’t for this illusionistic technique, the painting would be very two-dimensional.

    Read More

  • Madonna And Child Giotto Comparison

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    One similarity between Giotto's and Cimabue's painting are that they show Madonna sitting on a throne with Jesus on her left side. Madonna and Jesus are also in the upper center of the painting surrounded by prophets and angels. The centers of paintings during the time were usually reserved for the Virgin Mary or Christ. (7) In both pieces, the angels and prophets are split equally on both sides of the paintings. Sometimes artists would place the same number of figures on one both sides, so as not to disturb the compositional consistency. This fundamental of symmetry had to be maintained in Byzantine art.

    Read More

  • Imagery In Ancient Roman Art

    1689 Words  | 4 Pages

    He discusses that Roman statues appear greatly similar to those of Ancient Greece, both in material and in style. The statues both from Greece and Roman Republic were made from slabs of marble and bronze. In both cultures, portraits were used as expressions of honor to both the living and the dead. They were often used in funerary spaces and sanctuaries. Stewart supports the same principle that the other critics have stated, that portraits and statues were used primarily by the wealthy and elite members of the republic. They decorated the public spaces of the people, as a reminder of leadership within the community and as a way to honor the authority’s power. Imperial portraits were used as a symbol of devotion and established the presence of a powerful empire, bringing the devotion towards the emperor

    Read More

  • The Roman Empire

    1687 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ed in times of good fortunes, and expansion. While during times of instability the artistic ingenuity would stagnate. Finally at the end of the empire, the art quality would decrease as the empire was deteriorating. This deterioration in art quality would continue for decades until the Renaissance would bring back an art quality on the level of that of ancient Rome under the Antonines. The type of art being created could be used as a very good indicator of what the political scene in Rome looked like at the time.

    Read More

  • Art Analysis

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both of these pieces of art have much in common. Their functions are almost identical. Both were used to mark burial sites and to honor the deceased buried there. The body language of both the pieces’ figures are similar, with one seated and several others standing around them. Neither has color, but unlike the grave stele, the funerary banquet does show some degree of emotion. The figures in the banquet scene have slight smiles. These pieces played an important role in their times, honoring those who had passed on to the afterlife. For both of these people, it was important to memorialize them very similar to our practices today.

    Read More

  • Roman and Islamic Art and Architecture

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Romans have adopted many features from the Greek style of art and architecture during the third and second centuries B.C. During that time period the Romans discovered that they have taking a liking to Greek statues, which they placed in many different places. The Roman sculptors then decided to also start making statues alongside the Greeks. The statues that the Romans created were realistic looking with, sometime, unpleasant details of the body. The Greeks made statues with, what they thought of, ideal appearances in the statues figure. Sculpture was possibly considered the highest form of art by the Romans, but figure painting was very high considered as well. Very little of Roman painting has survived the tests of time.

    Read More

  • ROMAN COPIES OF GREEK ORIGINALS

    2156 Words  | 5 Pages

    The construct of the ‘Roman copy’ in art history has deeply rooted and extensive origins. Whilst this prejudiced was attached to Roman sculpture from an extremely early time in modern archaeology and art history, the construct viewed in a current context reveals issues with both its development and contribution to historical understanding and education. The construct is formed upon several main factors that have recently been called into question by revisionist historians. Firstly, the development of the construct by conservative historians during the 18th century, a context that valued artistic originality and authenticity, lead to it’s popularisation and circulation as a respected model. Secondly, the construct rests entirely on the presumption that Greek art is in fact aesthetically and artistically superior, insinuating a negative predisposition towards Roman artistic workmanship and aesthetics. Lastly, technological advancements aiding historiography have asserted the fact that many conclusions drawn by conservative historians through their methodology are in fact irrefutably incorrect. While the basis for much of the conservative historians argument has been seen as flawed, or otherwise seriously questioned in terms of accurate and reliable history, the construct of ‘Roman copies’ of Greek originals has remained a legitimised understanding and interpretation of Roman art for centuries. The question can then be raised as to whether the attention given to this aspect of history is worth the fact that much of the history being taught is now being heavily questioned.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Laocoon And His Two Sons

    957 Words  | 2 Pages

    We find that, in conclusion, that these pieces are very similar in many ways. They are both originally created in the same style and time period. They are Hellenistic and dramatic, although in their own, individualistic way. Each sculpture was created in different mediums and have different stories. These are both very individualistic pieces of Greco/Roman sculpture that has influenced many artists throughout time and will

    Read More

  • Modern Life Influenced by Greeks and Romans

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ws the transition from archaic to the classical period. The Roman’s continued with a more realistic style with such statues as Aristocrat with Ancestors and Marcus Aurelius. In wall paintings at Pompeii the artists used great color and realism on the people’s faces.

    Read More

  • Classical Roman Art Vs. Early Christian Art

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    Roman art was also deeply influenced by the art of the Hellenistic world, which had spread to southern Italy and Sicily through the Greek colonies there. The Etruscans and Babylonians can also be seen as inspirations. “With the founding of the Republic, the term Roman art was virtually synonymous with the art of the city of Rome, which still bore the stamp of its Etruscan art” (Honour and Fleming,1999). During the last two centuries, notably that of Greece, Roman art shook off its dependence on Etruscan art. In the last two centuries before Christ, a distinctive Roman manner of building, sculpting, and painting emerged. Indeed, because of the extraordinary geographical extent of the Roman Empire and the number of diverse populations encompassed within its boundaries, “the art and architecture of the Romans was always eclectic and is characterized by varying styles attributable to differing regional tastes and the...

    Read More

  • The French Revolution & Art

    2050 Words  | 5 Pages

    Additionally, the styles changed; from Rococo, which was meant to represent the aristocratic power and the “style that (…) and ignored the lower classes” (Cullen), to Neoclassicism, which had a special emphasis on the Roman civilization’s virtues, and also to Romanticism, which performs a celebration of the individual and of freedom. Obviously, also the subject matter that inspired the paintings has changed as wel...

    Read More

More about What Are The Similarities Between Ancient Rome And Modern Rome

Open Document