Community policing represents a philosophy that emphasizes the proactive role of police in forming partnerships with community members to address public safety issues. This approach enhances trust, transparency, and collaboration between law enforcement agencies and their communities. The four dimensions of community policing include community partnership, problem-solving, organizational transformation, and problem-oriented policing (Cordner, 2014). The first dimension of community policing is community partnership. The community is an element of the police organizational environment; the community generates police activity and sets up the environment where police work must be done (Cordner, G. W. 2023). It involves building strong relationships, …show more content…
I believe that community policing, in general, is a vast topic to rate as being a success or a failure overall. It's always going to be a fluid method of policing that will have ups and downs. Chief Mangan's approach was to ensure the department's morale was first taken care of, and I see this as a significant piece in any workplace environment you enter. If morale is down, so is activity, no matter where you are career-wise. Chief Mangan spent the first year ensuring that the department had better equipment, then sat down with officers and supervisors to garner ideas about what they could do better regarding community policing and the department overall. Chief Mangan also set department values and used the FBI, initially stating that it stood for fidelity, bravery, and integrity (Cordner, G. W., 2023). He took that and thought of using Service, Pride, and Dedication for SPD (Cordner, G. W., 2023). I believe having department values is a significant step in getting the department on track with where you want to go, and it gives every officer an extra reason why they're doing it. Towards the end, I believe that he was taking a wrong turn by not having a chain of command sequence followed, skipping superiors within that command to speak with officers directly, and telling them to focus more on community policing. With the sergeant wanting to increase his stats, the sergeant …show more content…
Reasons for exercising discretion may include maintaining public order, protecting individual rights, or promoting community well-being. Other factors affecting an officer’s decision may include personal biases, previous experiences, and situational dynamics. While discretion allows officers to adapt to diverse situations, inconsistencies in its application can lead to concerns about fairness and accountability. However, eliminating the ability to exercise discretion may hinder officers’ ability to respond effectively to complex and unpredictable situations, suggesting that a balanced approach is needed to ensure accountability while maintaining flexibility (Cordner, 2014; Rosenbaum & Yeh, 2012). I do not believe the ability to exercise discretion should be taken away. Currently, being a police officer, I think discretion is an essential tool, especially when you're speaking of community-oriented policing. Specific laws within Tennessee and other states explicitly state whether an officer has discretion. For example, in the state of Tennessee, with a domestic assault, which is a class A misdemeanor, there is no discretion, and an arrest shall be made. Felonies also do not have any discretion, and if a felony has been committed, you need to make an arrest; aside from that, I
“community policing is a philosophy of full service personalized policing, where the same officer patrols and works in the same area on a permanent basis, from a decentralized place, working in a proactive partnership with citizens to identify and solve problems.”
The police are usually charged with the great responsibility of ensuring that citizens are living quality lives that are free of crime and fear. In order to perform this duty effectively, the police need accurate and deeper knowledge of the citizens and issues they encounter in their daily lives. This knowledge will not be easy to come by if the police work independently from the citizens. Over the last several decades, police agencies have been working to gain the respect and the cooperation of the communities they serve. Community Oriented Policing was introduced to bring a closer working relationship between the citizens and the police.
Community policing has emerged since the 1970s as an increasingly important strategy for controlling and preventing crime and enhancing community safety. It is both a philosophy and an organizational strategy that allows the police and the community to work closely together in creative ways to solve the problems of crime, drugs, fear of crime, physical and social disorder, neighborhood decay, and the overall quality of life in the community. Community policing is difficult to define. Although it does not have a single definition, there are many elements of community policing.
Community policing stresses the entire cooperation between members of the police force and the community. It necessitates that everyone in the police force, including both civilian officers and sworn personnel, understands that the focus is on resolving community problems, and in doing so, may challenge the everyday policing norms.
Community policing is a strategy used by various departments in order to create and maintain a relationship between the law enforcement agency and the community being patrolled. Community policing is composed of three critical components, community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving (Gardiner, 154, 2016). Community partnerships are pivotal in community policing since they increase public trust and create am improved relationship in law enforcement agencies better serving the community (Gardiner, 87, 2016). These partnerships not only offer public input but also encourage the public to cooperate with law enforcement agencies in order to minimize crime within the community (Gardiner, 88, 2016). Unlike, the traditional strategies of policing, community orientated policing has been adopted by two-thirds of agencies in order to improve public safety and control crime. (Gardiner, 148, 2016).
There are many different ways of policing in the 21st century and all address and apply different theories and ideas to try and control the crime this day in age. One of these methods is called community policing and many law enforcement agencies around our country and the world use it as a model for policing and interacting with communities. Community policing is based on the belief that policing agencies should partner with communities with the goals to prevent or reduce the amount of crime in those areas (Pollock, 2012 p. 99). There are 3 main aspects of community policing that I will talk about in this paper and they are community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving. After hearing about the
There has always been a love-hate relationship between the public and the police. When called upon to help, they can be something sent from God, but when they are writing tickets, or taking a friend to jail, the view changes from a savior to a presence that is unwanted and often hated. An effort to improve the public view of law enforcement is being attempted by many departments. Using different styles of policing techniques, mainly community based policing, has proved to be the best way to improve the image of law enforcement.
The Good and Bad: Implementing Community-Oriented Policing. Trikea Williams American Military University CMRJ 302: U.S. Law Enforcement Dr. Jeffrey Doughtary June 23, 2024 Abstract For over 30 years, community-oriented policing has been around to support and promote the organizational strategies to put more attention on the causes, decrease fear crime, increase crime prevention. There are many ways that community-oriented policing has helped law enforcement by decreasing social disorder and creating more problem-solving tactics.
Community oriented policing has been around for over 30 years, and promotes and supports organizational strategies to address the causes, and reduce the fear of crime and social disorder through problem solving tactics. The way community policing works is it requires the police and citizens to work together to increase safety for the public. Each community policing program is different depending on the needs of the community. There have been five consistent key elements of an effective community oriented policing program: Adopting community service as the overarching philosophy of the organization, making an institutional commitment to community policing that is internalized throughout the command structure, emphasizing geographically decentralized models of policing that stress services tailored to the needs of individual communities rather than a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire jurisdiction, empowering citizens to act in partnership with the police on issues of crime and more broadly defined social problems, for example, quality-of-life issues, and using problem-oriented or problem-solving approaches involving police personnel working with community members. Community oriented policing has improved the public’s perception of the police in a huge way. Community policing builds more relationships with the
From this Community Police Consortium, the BJA put together a report titled Understanding Community Policing, A Framework for Action, which focused on developing a conceptual framework for community policing and assisting agencies in implementing community policing. The basis for this consortium was much more direct than the previous efforts set forth by Presidential Commissions during the 1960’s and 1970’s, and led to what became known as the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS, Title 1 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994). The core components outlined in the BJA report listed the two complementary core components to community policing: community partnership and problem solving. The report further stated that effective community policing depends on positive contact between patrol officers and community members, establishing and maintaining mutual trust as the primary goal of a community partnership, and police and community must join together to encourage and preserve peace and prosperity. While these are just a few of the recommendations listed in the report, there were many more that set forth the framework for community policing, but these were the core components.
In order to establish community policing within a jurisdiction, it first has to start with establishing a mutual trust between the agency and the community. In an effort to establish this trust and a true community partnership, departments often will have to look past the traditional policing perspective of response based policing. Police must embrace the concept that their job not only is addressing calls for service but also that they must be mindful of the activities that improve the well-being of neighborhoods. These types of activities that surpass simply response based policing include: helping crime victims, resolving conflicts between families and neighbors, handling ongoing civil issues, and working with other partners to improve neighborhood conditions, to name a few. By police engaging in these types of activities that were not part of rapid response and simple high visibility patrol, it provides opportunities to gain trust.
Community policing has evolved as an important technique in modern law enforcement, with a focus on developing strong relationships between officers and the communities they represent. This strategy departs from typical, reactive policing approaches, instead emphasizing proactive involvement, collaboration, and issue solutions. This essay delves into the fundamental notion of community policing, describes numerous initiatives by police departments that aim to enhance their public image, and evaluates the findings from federal research on police-public interactions. Community policing is an approach and method used by police departments to prevent crime-causing settings such as local neighborhoods, with the goal of achieving greater effectiveness
Community policing is the philosophy that promotes strategies that support the use of partnerships and problem- solving techniques that are proactively address conditions to rise public safety issues like fear of crime, social disorder, and crime. There are three components to community policing, they are community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving. The four elements of community policing are community involvement, problem solving, a community base, and redefined goals for the police.
Community policing is a policy and a strategy aimed at achieving more effective and efficient crime control, reduced fear of crime, improved quality of life, improved police services and police legitimacy, through a proactive reliance on community resources that seeks to change crime causing conditions. This assumes a need for greater accountability of police, greater public share in decision-making and greater concern for civil rights and liberties.
Community policing is a law enforcement strategy that encourages interactive partnerships between law enforcement agencies and the people they serve (Berlin, Michael M. "Encyclopedia of Community Policing and Problem Solving.") These partnerships help communities find solutions to problems with collaborative problem solving and improved public trust. Through this model, the public plays a role in prioritizing public safety problems (Berlin, Michael M. "Encyclopedia of Community Policing and Problem Solving.")