Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective communications with police
The philosophy of community policing
The goals of community policing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Evolution of Community Policing Decades later, during the 1980’s and 1990’s politicians, law enforcement agencies, and citizens still continued to struggle with issues of crime, reports of police brutality, increased arrests and incarceration of people of color, high murder rates, a drug epidemic, and distrust between police and many minority citizens. Most attributed these issues to a lack of job opportunities and the explosion of a drug epidemic, which plagued many cities, minority communities, and citizens. Another factor that contributed to putting strains on police-community relations was a declaration by President Ronald Reagan in 1982 declaring a War on Drugs, which many minorities (Blacks and Hispanics) saw as an attack on their communities. As a result of these issues, in 1994 the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), under then President Bill Clinton put together a Community Police Consortium, which was made up of law enforcement officials and community leaders from around the country. From this Community Police Consortium, the BJA put together a report titled Understanding Community Policing, A Framework for Action, which focused on developing a conceptual framework for community policing and assisting agencies in implementing community policing. The basis for this consortium was much more direct than the previous efforts set forth by Presidential Commissions during the 1960’s and 1970’s, and led to what became known as the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS, Title 1 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994). The core components outlined in the BJA report listed the two complementary core components to community policing as community partnership and problem solving. The report further stated that effective community policing depends on positive contact between patrol officers and community members, establishing and maintaining mutual trust as the primary goal of a community partnership, and police and community must join together to encourage and preserve Today in 2015, community policing is as relevant as it has ever been in the history of America policing as many law enforcement agencies across the country continue to try and build stronger relationships, and establish partnerships between police officers and the communities they serve, especially minority communities. Since the 1990’s and early 2000’s many police agencies have come to accept the concepts of community oriented policing, and have made great strides towards better community-police relations. Many departments now meet regularly with neighborhood groups, allow citizens to participate in citizen police academies, conduct forums to give citizens a better understanding of the duties of police officers and their actions. Some police departments require and encourage officer to get out of their patrol vehicle and initiate positive contact with the people on their beats (Shusta, Levine, Wong, Olson, & Harris, 2011). All of these efforts are important and relevant to community policing, which helps to remove and diminish negative images of police officers. Citizens are more willing to work hand in hand with police officers who are approachable, engaged, and take ownership in the neighborhoods they serve, which is what community policing is all
The author focuses on the U.S. Task Force on 21st Century Policing and Police Data Initiative or PDI to determine if it helps to restore trust and the broken relationship between and communities and police officers. The Task Force made by Barack Obama recommended the analysis of department policies, incidents of misconduct, recent stops and arrests, and demographics of the officers. The PDI has tasked 21 cities to comprehend the police behavior and find out what to do to change it. Also PDI was said to have data and information on vehicle stops and shootings by police officers. The use of statistics has a purpose to help rebuild trust and the relationship between and communities and police officers.
In order for the police to successfully prevent crimes, public cooperation is needed. Various community policing programs have been implemented and it is important to discuss the benefits and limitations of these programs. Community policing allows the community to be actively involved and become a partner in promoting safety. This partnership increases trust of police officers and helps citizens understand that the police are on their side and want to improve their quality of life (Ferreira, 1996). The role of the police officers goes beyond that of a “crime fighter” and expands to multiple roles including that of a victim-centered
Both of these articles were focused on the Strategy of Policing, but the author’s approaches to the ‘hot topics,’ couldn’t be more difficult. Williams and Murphy focused on the different eras of policing, and how the racial conflicts have overlapped policing efforts. Whereas, Kelling and Moore focused on how police have evolved with the eras. The articles were dramatically different, however, the policing eras: Political, Reform, and Community Orientated eras were influenced largely as the main focuses for each academic article.
Community policing stresses the entire cooperation between members of the police force and the community. It necessitates that everyone in the police force, including both civilian officers and sworn personnel, understands that the focus is on resolving community problems, and in doing so, may challenge the everyday policing norms.
This concept has been around for decades and is believed to be an important aspect of law enforcement and the foundation of communicating with the people a law enforcement agency serves. There is such a strong belief in community policing in 2004 the Department of Justice (DOJ) dedicated an entire division to it. The DOJ calls this division the Community Oriented Policing Service also known as COPS. The Department of Justice states “Community policing begins with a commitment to building trust and mutual respect between police and communities. It is critical to public safety, ensuring that all stakeholders work together to address our nation's crime challenges. When police and communities collaborate, they more effectively address underlying issues, change negative behavioral patterns, and allocate
“The police are the people and the people are the police” those words, said by Sir Robert Peel, the father of community policing, describe how a well ran city and police department should be. The people of the community should feel comfortable enough with its own police department to act as the police department’s eyes. A police department can only afford to pay so many police officers, that it is virtually impossible to bring justice to all the wrong doings in the community. That is where the community comes into play, by acting as the eyes of the police force. In order for this to happen the community needs to feel comfortable and at home with the police force. This means that a police department has to
Oliver, William. (1998). Community-Oriented Policing: A Systemic Approach to Policing (Second edition 2001). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Community policing is a strategy used by various departments in order to create and maintain a relationship between the law enforcement agency and the community being patrolled. Community policing is composed of three critical components, community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving (Gardiner, 154, 2016). Community partnerships are pivotal in community policing since they increase public trust and create am improved relationship in law enforcement agencies better serving the community (Gardiner, 87, 2016). These partnerships not only offer public input but also encourage the public to cooperate with law enforcement agencies in order to minimize crime within the community (Gardiner, 88, 2016). Unlike, the traditional strategies of policing, community orientated policing has been adopted by two-thirds of agencies in order to improve public safety and control crime. (Gardiner, 148, 2016).
There are many different ways of policing in the 21st century and all address and apply different theories and ideas to try and control the crime this day in age. One of these methods is called community policing and many law enforcement agencies around our country and the world use it as a model for policing and interacting with communities. Community policing is based on the belief that policing agencies should partner with communities with the goals to prevent or reduce the amount of crime in those areas (Pollock, 2012 p. 99). There are 3 main aspects of community policing that I will talk about in this paper and they are community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving. After hearing about the
Liederbach, J., Fritsch, E. J., Carter, D. L., & Bannister, A (2007). Exploring the Limits of Collaboration in Community Policing: A Direct Comparison of Police and Citizen Views. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 31 (2), 271-291.
Community oriented policing has been around for over 30 years, and promotes and supports organizational strategies to address the causes, and reduce the fear of crime and social disorder through problem solving tactics. The way community policing works is it requires the police and citizens to work together to increase safety for the public. Each community policing program is different depending on the needs of the community. There have been five consistent key elements of an effective community oriented policing program: Adopting community service as the overarching philosophy of the organization, making an institutional commitment to community policing that is internalized throughout the command structure, emphasizing geographically decentralized models of policing that stress services tailored to the needs of individual communities rather than a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire jurisdiction, empowering citizens to act in partnership with the police on issues of crime and more broadly defined social problems, for example, quality-of-life issues, and using problem-oriented or problem-solving approaches involving police personnel working with community members. Community oriented policing has improved the public’s perception of the police in a huge way. Community policing builds more relationships with the
The writer contends that community policing can bridge the gap in trust between the community and police departments. Community policing allows citizens to get to know their community police officers. The relationship can have a positive impact on reducing crime. The writer contends that police officers must be able to use good judgement when they encounter violations. Selective enforcement is a key element of having a successful community policing program. Selective enforcement also has its critics. Critics will point out the inconsistencies with regard to selective enforcement. Critics argue that enforcement can be based on race, culture, and social status. Recent studies paint a different picture. A federal study of police and public contracts revealed that police stops are fairly similar across racial lines. The study revealed that whites are stopped at a rate of 8.9%, blacks at 8.1%, and Hispanics at 8.9%. The study did reveal that blacks are more likely to be search and arrested if they are stopped (Bohn & Haley,
To conclude, Community policing represents a major development in the history of American law enforcement, but the extent to which this approach is a success and dominates contemporary policing remains a source of debate. In my point of view, community policing is good for communities. It has challenged the traditional concept of the police as crime-fighters by drawing attention to the complexities of the police role and function. In addition to the police officer hard work; citizens can also make a difference and contribute to make neighborhoods a better place to live. For instance, citizens can hold community meetings to talk about concerns and agree on solutions help organize healthy activities for children in your neighborhood, join or starting a neighborhood crime watch program, and talk to your community police officers and share information and concerns.
Law enforcement is entrusted authority figures by individuals in the community. Therefore, when that trust is jeopardized due to misconduct by police there is a disconnection. The misrepresentation of the department by the officer demoralizes the establishment of the organization. Furthermore, it brings down the trust of the community for the police; and hinder opposing relations between the police and the community; and escalation of dislike toward police, which can lead to an aggressive community (Wu, Smith & Sun, 2013). Blacks tend to have a dislike for law enforcement while Whites tend to be in for the police (Wu, Smith & Sun, 2013). The research will look at factors that influence the attitudes of the African-American community. The factors that will be the focus of this study will be mass media coverage of police conduct, neighborhood conduction (the level of crime in the neighborhood), and perception of officer behavior rather informal or formal when dealing with individuals in the community. Therefore, to close the gap between law enforcement and African-Americans relationship the factors that form police perception needs to be understood to handle challenges and opportunities to improve the issues in the black communities in which they serve (Vogel,
The community must be a participant in battling crime and disorder (Peak 2009)(98). An increase in the quality and quantity of contacts between citizens and police to resolve community concerns can enhance community life. As Wilson suggests, "the public should be seen along with the police as co-producers of safety and order” (2006).